Early Closure Of The Cranial Sutures - The Cause Of Male Pattern Baldness

[Ritchie]

I would definitely not speak with them like that. It's none of my business. On the internet that's just my language. Sorry if I come across as offensive.

i am not offended, i was just confused. No need to change the way you speak on the internet unless someone actually gets offended. You dont need to apologize lol, i understand you jusyt talk like that on the interent and didnt mean any harm and i have no reason to be offended since i am not somalian.

 

[WaccWaccWacc]

I would definitely not speak with them like that. It's none of my business. On the internet that's just my language. Sorry if I come across as offensive.

Yea, my comment was pretty mean. But at this point I really don’t care. The amount of time Ive wasted on this thread seriously irks me. I and ignored both of them but I kept getting notifications from you.

 

[Niki99]

Yea, my comment was pretty mean. But at this point I really don’t care. The amount of time Ive wasted on this thread seriously irks me. I and ignored both of them but I kept getting notifications from you.

Sorry for that. I can be a bit stubborn. I really like to argue and discuss and I try to not dismiss any theories or claims (apart from things like "the earth is flat"). That's why I'm sometimes stuck in discussions that others see as pointless.

 

[Ritchie]

just delete your messages pussy and you will stop being notified. Its not that difficult.

 

[WaccWaccWacc]

Sorry for that. I can be a bit stubborn. I really like to argue and discuss and I try to not dismiss any theories or claims (apart from things like "the earth is flat"). That's why I'm sometimes stuck in discussions that others see as pointless.

I really think you should just drop it. You’re arguing with a kid who can fit a PS5 in his mouth. And a kid who posts widely different pictures of scalps and builds onto/alters his theory everyday.

 

[Here For the Lulz]

It may give them a look similar to those who are balding, but it is most definitely not a cause. These kids aren’t balding, their hairline is being distorted. Without this factor, they would have full heads of air. The cause of male pattern baldness isn’t a mystery, it’s genetic and unrelated to skeletal deformity or muscle tension. Not sure where you come up with this stuff. You’re either born with genes that cause balding or your not, it’s that simple. Stress to the scalp and follicles May cause hairloss, some of which may, (under the right circumstances), become permanent, but it does not cause baldness.

 

[Ritchie]

It may give them a look similar to those who are balding, but it is most definitely not a cause. These kids aren’t balding, their hairline is being distorted. Without this factor, they would have full heads of air. The cause of male pattern baldness isn’t a mystery, it’s genetic and unrelated to skeletal deformity or muscle tension. Not sure where you come up with this stuff. You’re either born with genes that cause balding or your not, it’s that simple. Stress to the scalp and follicles May cause hairloss, some of which may, (under the right circumstances), become permanent, but it does not cause baldness.

huh?? What on earth are you on about? You lost me in the first 3 sentences. He has posted pictures and videos of non balding men with their head shaved down to the skin and they all look different to that of balding men.

 

[Ritchie]

I like how CuckCuckCuck calls me a kid. He is not much older than me and i am clearly more mature.

 

[WaccWaccWacc]

It may give them a look similar to those who are balding, but it is most definitely not a cause. These kids aren’t balding, their hairline is being distorted. Without this factor, they would have full heads of air. The cause of male pattern baldness isn’t a mystery, it’s genetic and unrelated to skeletal deformity or muscle tension. Not sure where you come up with this stuff. You’re either born with genes that cause balding or your not, it’s that simple. Stress to the scalp and follicles May cause hairloss, some of which may, (under the right circumstances), become permanent, but it does not cause baldness.

But dude, look at this pics dude. Look at this guy with a full head of hair thats shaven his gaLeA is at a 38 degree angle, its so smooth! Woah bro that guys bald, his head is hugeeee!

i have them ignored, but thats exactly what those kids sound like.

 

[Ritchie]

^^^^
this is what you call stupidity. On the channel where we got the videos of non balding and balding men who shave their head. All videos are shot from the same angles. The balding men all had expanded galeas and big foreheads. You have us ignored because you are in denial. You are the only one who is insulting people and being toxic. Ive been called 100 names like retard etc but i havent blocked you, yet here you are blocking both of us and still coming back to the thread. You may say you blocked us because you dont want to lose brain cells by reading these posts but only a pathetic idiot can lose brain cells. Pegasus and niki seem to be fine after reading these posts and arent actually losing brain cells like you are. You are very angry, get help fast.

Anyone who is reading this. I want to show you how stupid CuckCuckCuck is. In mitko's old thread, he said "every man who has bangs covering their forehead will give the illusion of having a square face"

May i present to you Jake Gyllenhaal and David Schwimmer with bangs, very square faces indeed.

 

[Ritchie]

@Niki99 yesterday i was sleepy so i didnt process your message properly, but you did not debunk anything just because according to numetric standards your face is considered horizontal. I never used numbers, i posted pictures of a horizontal faces and you don't look like them. Joe Keery for example does not fit my criteria of horizontal square faces but his face looks significantly shorter than yours but he does not have a horizontal square face either according to my standards.

 

[Niki99]

@Niki99 yesterday i was sleepy so i didnt process your message properly, but you did not debunk anything just because according to numetric standards your face is considered horizontal. I never used numbers, i posted pictures of a horizontal faces and you don't look like them. Joe Keery for example does not fit my criteria of horizontal square faces but his face looks significantly shorter than yours but he does not have a horizontal square face either according to my standards.

That's your problem. You have to quantify your theory with numbers. You have to or otherwise your theory will never be scientific and cannot be taken seriously. The fact of the matte is. I have a horizontal face by every metric there is. If that does not fit your criteria you have to DEFINE that criteria with numbers. You can't just look at faces and say "this does not fit". You have to make a range with numbers what does fit/does not fit and what your criteria really is. Otherwise this whole theory is pointless and can be dismissed. You have to follow the scientific method. It has to be palpable, repeatable, peer reviewed, detailed and it has to be verifiable. Please look it up. That's why people get so frustrated here with you guys. Like I said to you in private, most "normal" people don't really grasp how big and complex their field of interest really is, as they are not professionals. It's like looking at the ocean from the beach, seeing it and thinking that's all there is, thinking that you just have to analyze the part you see and when you did that, thinking that you have now analyzed all life in the ocean while not realizing that the Ocean is actually incredibly larger and more complex than you could have ever imagined. This mechanism results in you and Mitko hugely overestimating the knowledge you guys have. That's also called the Dunning Kruger effect. It's pretty common. People with an interest in a topic, while not being a scientist or an expert, are usually more confident in their limited findings than experts who know that there is so much more to be discovered, resulting in arrogance and false results and sometimes even resulting in superiority complexes where one thinks he is smarter than he actually is.


Until you can give a framework for your theory that is scientifically acceptable, it's pointless to post here anymore. I'm not trying to be rude but that's just how it is. The same goes to Mitko.

 

[WaccWaccWacc]

That's your problem. You have to quantify your theory with numbers. You have to or otherwise your theory will never be scientific and cannot be taken seriously. The fact of the matte is. I have a horizontal face by every metric there is. If that does not fit your criteria you have to DEFINE that criteria with numbers. You can't just look at faces and say "this does not fit". You have to make a range with numbers what does fit/does not fit and what your criteria really is. Otherwise this whole theory is pointless and can be dismissed. You have to follow the scientific method. It has to be palpable, repeatable, peer reviewed, detailed and it has to be verifiable. Please look it up. That's why people get so frustrated here with you guys. Like I said to you in private, most "normal" people don't really grasp how big and complex their field of interest really is, as they are not professionals. It's like looking at the ocean from the beach, seeing it and thinking that's all there is, thinking that you just have to analyze the part you see and when you did that, thinking that you have now analyzed all life in the ocean while not realizing that the Ocean is actually incredibly larger and more complex than you could have ever imagined. This mechanism results in you and Mitko hugely overestimating the knowledge you guys have. That's also called the Dunning Kruger effect. It's pretty common. People with an interest in a topic, while not being a scientist or an expert, are usually more confident in their limited findings than experts who know that there is so much more to be discovered, resulting in arrogance and false results and sometimes even resulting in superiority complexes where one thinks he is smarter than he actually is.

Save your breathe and time. I’ve already said pretty much this whole thread like... no lie... maybe 8 times. They just always ignore it or say “use the eyes you have”. They simply cannot grasp what you’re saying. Plain and simple.

 

[Ritchie]

That's your problem. You have to quantify your theory with numbers. You have to or otherwise your theory will never be scientific and cannot be taken seriously. The fact of the matte is. I have a horizontal face by every metric there is. If that does not fit your criteria you have to DEFINE that criteria with numbers. You can't just look at faces and say "this does not fit". You have to make a range with numbers what does fit/does not fit and what your criteria really is. Otherwise this whole theory is pointless and can be dismissed. You have to follow the scientific method. It has to be palpable, repeatable, peer reviewed, detailed and it has to be verifiable. Please look it up. That's why people get so frustrated here with you guys. Like I said to you in private, most "normal" people don't really grasp how big and complex their field of interest really is, as they are not professionals. It's like looking at the ocean from the beach, seeing it and thinking that's all there is, thinking that you just have to analyze the part you see and when you did that, thinking that you have now analyzed all life in the ocean while not realizing that the Ocean is actually incredibly larger and more complex than you could have ever imagined. This mechanism results in you and Mitko hugely overestimating the knowledge you guys have. That's also called the Dunning Kruger effect. It's pretty common. People with an interest in a topic, while not being a scientist or an expert, are usually more confident in their limited findings than experts who know that there is so much more to be discovered, resulting in arrogance and false results and sometimes even resulting in superiority complexes where one thinks he is smarter than he actually is.


Until you can give a framework for your theory that is scientifically acceptable, it's pointless to post here anymore. I'm not trying to be rude but that's just how it is. The same goes to Mitko.

I already said you cannot use numbers, everyones face is different, everyones midface is a little different.

 

[Niki99]

I already said you cannot use numbers, everyones face is different, everyones midface is a little different.

Of course midfaces are different that's the reason why you use numbers in the first place to determine what is long, what is short. That's literally how science works.
Because everyone and everything is different we have invented things like categories, averages the median etc.. that's the whole point. You really don't get it or you don't want to. According to what you just said we can just abolish science as a whole because it founds on the basis you try to refute. You try to refute nature itself basically and you don't even understand that.

It's like saying "we can't analyze basketball players and the points they put out, because everyone's body is different". That's ridiculous.

And just because you say science doesn't count and you can't use numbers, you aren't right. You are not the one who determines how you test a theory. That has been done and it's accepted. It's the only way to do it. Subjective findings are not representative.. again that's the reason why studies exist. You suffer from delusion, confirmation bias and cognitive dissonance. I'm not even saying your theory is definitely complety wrong. Just that it is nonscientific right now and never will/never can be accepted that way as we have no framework to really judge said theory.

 

[Ritchie]

Of course midfaces are different that's the reason why you use numbers in the first place to determine what is long, what is short. That's literally how science works.
Because everyone and everything is different we have invented things like categories, averages the median etc.. that's the whole point. You really don't get it or you don't want to. According to what you just said we can just abolish science as a whole because it founds on the basis you try to refute. You try to refute nature itself basically and you don't even understand that.

It's like saying "we can't analyze basketball players and the points they put out, because everyone's body is different". That's ridiculous.

i never once said short midfaces are less likely to go bald, you were under that impression, i didnt say it once.
These are the square horizontal faces that do fit my criteria. They either have average or decent bone sturcture. People with this headshape dont even need a flat galea like theo rossi, it can just be a normal galea, but not expanded.



These two men do not fit my criteria as you can clearly see but their face is significantly shorter than your face from the pictures you provided


This guy also, for example, is closer to kennedy, you are not and no amount of numbers will change that.

 

[Niki99]

Numbers change everything. Just because things appear one way, that doesn't make it true. The earth appears flat, yet it isn't. A plane appears slower than a car that goes by you, yet it isn't. You appear to stand still, yet you do not. Special features can look bigger on people yet their feature is actually small when you compare it to the average. Other features can make it look a certain way, they work in synergy. Pictures are not scientific and are definitely not proof. I will repeat that. Work out a scientific framework for your claim that can be tested, make an actual hypothesis, make studies, let them get peer reviewed and make it logically sound. Make your studies repeatable. Until then everything you say can be dismissed and has no value. End of story.

 

[Ritchie]

I am not suffering from delusion. Yesterday catagen had to spend close to an hour trying to tell you that your face isnt as horizontal as Kennedy's, your statement was "i can objectively say JFK's face isn't more horizontal than mine", which is objectively false.

 

[Niki99]

I am not suffering from delusion. Yesterday catagen had to spend close to an hour trying to tell you that your face isnt as horizontal as Kennedy's, your statement was "i can objectively say JFK's face isn't more horizontal than mine", which is objectively false.

It was, I'm not a mythical being that is never wrong, but I said that one time and all the other times I said "I think the difference isn't that high", and I was right.

And even then.. that does not dismiss all the other things I just said. Let's not change topics here . My claim from yesterday has nothing to do with your theory not being scientific .

 

[Ritchie]

It was, I'm not a mythical being that is never wrong, but I said that one time and all the other times I said "I think the difference isn't that high", and I was right.

And even then.. that does not dismiss all the other things I just said. Let's not change topics here . My claim from yesterday has nothing to do with your theory not being scientific .

but you called me delusional, that was just in response to that.