- Reaction score
- 1,336
"On the combined-therapy side, however, hair growth was obvious and the density of hairs determined under trichoscope was significantly increased compared with the monotherapy side (P < 0.001)."
How you get quantitative data?
Great question... There are plenty of ways for them to conduct a t-test but none are particularly appropriate for this situation
How about measuring hair density before and after in specific areas on both sides?
They used a 36 needle array at 1.5 mm for ~20 minutes, so 40 minutes if they did the entire scalp. Once a week.
I hear you. 1.5mm is excruciatingly painful.I do wonder if they settled on .8mm depth due to considerations beyond efficacy.
I've been thinking getting deeper to break up the fibrosis might be helpful to allow these new and miniaturized follicles to move deeper into the skin where they are supposed to be.
I would agree if the difference was minor, as hair could grow back somewhat faster on one side. However, he was a NW7, and the difference was "obvious". This is more evidence that microneedling is the biggest advance in hair loss treatment in 30 years, as if that wasn't already apparent.
They used a 36 needle array at 1.5 mm for ~20 minutes, so 40 minutes if they did the entire scalp. Once a week.