Follica - New Patent Published 2017 - Needling Device And Drug Applicator

hanginginthewire

hanginginthewire

Senior Member
Reaction score
1,429
image.gif
 
N

nameless

Banned
Reaction score
1,091
Crystalclear12 said:
If a doctor told u that eating your own sh*t was healthy, you'd do it. You realize when a doctor goes to medical school and gets an MD it doesn't make them a master of every single medical sector right? Lol YOU ARE SO STUPID!
Click to expand...

You calling someone else stupid is pure projection. You're a total imbecile. Only a total imbecile would conclude that simply disagreeing with you means someone else is stupid enough to eat sh*t just because a doctor says he should. What a f'n idiot you are to even think of something this psyho and stupid. You're a totally unhinged moron.

The mere fact that the laser is new and the procedure is new means that Follica mght keep strict control of who uses their device and procedure to protect themselves from libability, you crazy imbecile. Plus, the FDA may also restrict who can use the device and perform the procedure initially. And it could take years for the FDA to budge from that position.

If follica or the FDA won't allow unqualified people to perform the procedure in America you should just go to some foreign country and have some groundskeeper perform the procedure on you.
 
Last edited:
C

Crystalclear12

Banned
My Regimen
Reaction score
292
nameless said:
Here's what doctors say:

https://www.realself.com/question/who-qualified-do-laser-skin-resurfacing


Read below - highlighting by me:

HISTORICAL OVERVIEW: INCREASING CONCERNS ABOUT DELEGATION
Prior to 1998, there exist few if any published reports regarding nonphysician performance of laser procedures.1 Presumably, this dearth stemmed from the very small size of the laser business, which was the province of a few subspecialist physicians. Moreover, many commonly used lasers, such as those for hair removal and tattoo or pigment removal, had only recently been introduced, and their parameters of use were not standardized. The landscape has changed. As early as 8 to 10 years ago, reports documented the increasing tension between dermatologists and electrologists over the training required to perform laser hair removal, with dermatologists advocating that licensed physicians should supervise and be on-site; states, such as Texas, that do not require licensing for electrologists were a particular area of concern.1,2 Yet concurrently, data was presented to show that “properly trained” nurses had no greater risk than physicians of inducing undesirable outcomes like pigmentation change and blistering after laser hair removal with long-pulsed alexandrite laser.3 Most recently, the American Society for Dermatologic Surgery (ASDS) reported that more than 100 million laser and light-source cosmetic procedures were performed by its members.4 And the increase appears to be even greater among nonphysician providers. More ominously, studies suggest that a proportionately greater amount of complications are arising from dermatologic care delivered by physician extenders. Nearly 53% of 488 dermatologists surveyed in Texas in 2004 reported seeing increased complications associated with delegation to nonphysicians, with 33% of those surveyed asserting that they knew of such complications arising in the absence of a supervising physician on-site during treatment delivery.5 This confirmed earlier results of a survey of 2400 members of the ASDS in 2001, which ascribed the preponderance of posttreatment patient complications to “nonphysician operators,” including cosmetic technicians, estheticians, and workers in medical/dental offices who performed procedures for which they were not trained or during the performance of which they were inadequately supervised.6 A growing body of evidence suggests that nonphysician provision of laser services and insufficient physician oversight of extenders may be jeopardizing patients, unnecessarily raising complication rates, and leaving dermatologists vulnerable to public censure and legal liability.
Click to expand...
Thank you for not having kids.
 
C

Crystalclear12

Banned
My Regimen
Reaction score
292
nameless said:
You calling someone else stupid is pure projection. You are a total imbecile. Only a total imbecile would conclude that simply disagreeing with you means someone else is stupid enough to eat sh*t just because a doctor says he should. What a f'n idiot you are to even think of something this psyho and stupid. You are totally unhinged moron.
Click to expand...
I'm not calling you stupid because you disagree, I'm calling you stupid because your logic for disagreeing is stupid, inturn making you stupid. Your logic is so far from educated that you sound like my ignorant grandmother who has a 4th grade education, I legit feel like I'm talking to her when I talk to u. You are stupid.
 
C

Crystalclear12

Banned
My Regimen
Reaction score
292
nameless said:
You calling someone else stupid is pure projection. You are a total imbecile. Only a total imbecile would conclude that simply disagreeing with you means someone else is stupid enough to eat sh*t just because a doctor says he should. What a f'n idiot you are to even think of something this psyho and stupid. You are totally unhinged moron.

The mere fact that the laser is new and the procedure is new means that Follica mght keep strict control of who uses their device and procedure to protect themselves from libability, you crazy imbecile. Plus, the FDA may also restrict who can use the device and perform the procedure initially. And it could take years for the FDA to budge from that position.
Click to expand...
"Follica might keep strict control of who uses their device blah blah liability" ya your dumb. If you don't know why that's dumb then you're dumber.
 
H

H

Senior Member
Reaction score
775
Ah well its time to record all the productive discussions we've had on the thread to day where to start where to start...ah yes
 

Attachments

  • giphy (1).gif
    giphy (1).gif
    543.3 KB · Views: 324
Armando Jose

Armando Jose

Senior Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
993
Crystalclear12 said:
I hear ya man. Ya it can slow/spot then be aggressive for a few years, then slow/stop. Or it can be steady loss, or rapid loss (ppl that burn through norwoods in 5 years)
Click to expand...

Common baldness is a dynamic process,

sunchyme1 said:
lol this is me


View attachment 60286
im gonna be a nw7 alright. no doubt about it

im tried finasteride with good growth but bad sides. so im pinning all my hopes on these guys helping me out in the next 5/10 years
Click to expand...

You have a low hair density in sides.
when did you used finas?

ForeverBald said:
Wtf did he do with his hair:(:(:(
Click to expand...

It is a good piece, not a trasplant. Seeing this result is the reason because sometimes I would recomend a rug.

nameless said:
I call you a broscientist.
Click to expand...

https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?defid=6891151&term=Broscience

good terminology :)
 
L

Longway886

Established Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
743
Anddddd the thread has gone to sh*t again...

At least you tried noisettes, clearly desperate balding guys just need somewhere to vent frustration and seems to be anonymously through this forum is where they want to do it and gives them a tiny bit of hope having pointless arguments...

Just have to sift through the bullshit
 
H

H

Senior Member
Reaction score
775
Crystalclear12 said:
I'm not calling you stupid because you disagree, I'm calling you stupid because your logic for disagreeing is stupid, inturn making you stupid. Your logic is so far from educated that you sound like my ignorant grandmother who has a 4th grade education, I legit feel like I'm talking to her when I talk to u. You are stupid.
Click to expand...
Why you gotta dis gmama like that?
 
T

tomJ

Senior Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
518
Hi can someone knowledgeable please tell me when follica is beginning pivotal trial and when it is expected to end? Thanks
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2023 XenForo Ltd.
Top