That's a serious cope.
The reality: It doesn't make a woman a bad person if she's unattracted to unattractive men.
That's a serious cope.
The reality: It doesn't make a woman a bad person if she's unattracted to unattractive men.
Still nobody has got the point of this thread answered the question within it.
Interestingly, it went untouched completely for about 24 hours until someone replied and of coure then the barrage of (somewhat unrelated) negativity follows.
Why is she a sh*t girl?A girl who don't take you because you have hair loss is just a sh*t girl.
This same girl will leave you quickly if you will hit cancer or something else in your life.
Good , really good girls with an amazing character are very very rare.
It's like a 6 in lottery
There are multiple paths to happiness.
But saying someone is only happy because they look good and therefore not meaningfully happy is BS. You setup a false dichotomy and that's why people didn't respond ... Irrational statements often go over people 's heads.
If you look good you have an advantage in life. Same as being rich or healthy. Whether or not you use that advantage competently is a separate question. Many people squander their advantages, Val Kilmer for example, but that's besides the point.
yeah and this average as f*** looking c*** shot his baby batter in teresa palmer's snatch:
Exceptions exist
Why is she a sh*t girl?
'
Because she finds that person unattractive. What you, and I find attractive we have no control over. I cannot go into the control panel of my brain and tweek my choice of preference, and decide one day that I like fat women.
Am I a bad person for not wanting to be with fat women because it's disgusting to look at?
With respect, I don't think there is anything complictated about the question in my second paragraph. People avoid it because it goes against the popular consensus of this forum and of those personality types generally more attracted to this forum.
Who would you honestly say is more happy?... this guy below, or the guy who knows/believes deep down that his social group and girlfriend/wife are only in his life because of the number of/illusion of follicles on his head.
Your question is irrational, with respect. I'll rephrase it for you.
Would you rather be an ugly/plain guy who makes good decisions and ends up happy, or an attractive guy who makes poor decisions and ends up miserable?
It's not a very good question imo. The better questions are:
1) Would you rather be an ugly who makes good decisions, or an attractive guy who makes good decisions?
2) Would you rather be an ugly who makes poor decisions, or an attractive guy who makes poor decisions?
Those two questions are better because they isolate variables.
Good post, and I'll add that the lines of demarcation between "looks" and "personality" are not clearly drawn at all. Looks greatly influence our appraisal of personality traits like humor, kindness and trustworthiness. The long conversations in your example might seem extra interesting because of her liking the way you look. Where I diverge from many on this forum is I also think this works in reverse; you seem more attractive and the sex is better because the conversations are good.
So if you for one reason or another start looking much worse (say due to baldness), you'll likely not seem as funny, as kind or as interesting to the people you are with. I suspect this is why guys who start balding into the relationship often get dumped with the observation that "you've changed". You might have to over-compensate, by being extra funny, extra attentive, extra erudite, just to maintain the impression you gave the way you looked before.
It must be a whole lot easier living if you are unaware of these complexities. Now I can't unsee them and it has made me a whole lot more cynical about life and about people in general.
Nope, it is a very simple question yet everyone is trying to go off on their pre programmed 'impact of hair loss' tangent.
People want to carry on ranting about how ugly baldness is, how they dont blame women for seeing how ugly their genetics are but the question was simple and there was a reason for asking it.
What you, and I find attractive has no bearing on the character & how good of a person someone is.To get to the point:
my problem with many forum members here is that many of them think hair is everything.
If you have hair your life is just beautiful and amazing and everything is just perfect.
That's just a big illusion!
I do not understand this logic:
Hair make up five percent of your attractive and personality. 95 % are other features.
If i read some postings here then one could think hair is everything and every person on this planet is just love your hair and
nothing otherwise.
Sorry for my bad english but im sure you understand me
A girl who don't take you because you have hair loss is just a sh*t girl.
This same girl will leave you quickly if you will hit cancer or something else in your life.
Good , really good girls with an amazing character are very very rare.
It's like a 6 in lottery
Ha that 100% true then they will mention loose weight.first advice to a man to improve his looks is... CHANGE HAIRCUT
if hair do not matter why the f*** everyone is suggesting it