Good old h.l. nitpicking and arguing for the sake of nitpicking and arguing.
Captain forehead and Exodus generally agree with me. And oh surprise, they went bald aggressively in their teens.
Uncomfortable man started balding in his early 20's, but he gets it too.
It's always "nitpicking" when you're wrong.
I don't care what few people had aggressive teenage bald and agree with you, in your own words you said all NW4+ agree with you, you didn't specify age, and then you instantly (without even being asked to address it) went back on that and said that even an early 20's NW4 couldn't understand you or agree with you.
I'm not even trying to win an argument at this point, just letting you know that it made no sense. Read back on it if you wish.
H.L., your behaviour is an absolute disgrace on this forum, you constantly stalk people, not just me, around these forums and just continuously insult and provoke people. You've admitted before that you can see right through your hair in the morning and that you fluff your hair up, but you maintain in this thread that you don't have a combover, have a thick head of hair and will never be an NW5 (impossible) and you did taunt me for being bald even though you're half way to a diffuse NW5 yourself.
That's why I'm happy to know that you will be bald too. I know it terrifies you, you've admitted you had a mental breakdown before after seeing a particularly revealing photograph, but still you call me nutty and insane, even though by definition anyone posting on this forum is insanely concerned about hairloss. What I'm saying is that you deserve your NW5 future. You are an obnoxious hypocrite. It's poetic justice.
Constantly stalk people? I've been here several months, the only people I've replied to in different threads at the same time are you, Fred, and swingline, and often I've been replied at from these posters. Can you give a list of the people I apparently constantly stalk? Once I came on here to see you replied to me in 4 different topics (one was the most useless "jab" at just trying to get a response, which I ignored) so by that logic I could very much accuse you of the same thing. But if I'm constantly picking out a new victim, you should be able to easily rattle off a dozen of people I "constantly" follow around these forums. It's very simple, the same stupid people will write the same stupid ****, in different topics, you are currently one of these people, when I see you write the same stupid **** in another thread, I'll also reply in that one, I don't go seeking for it. Maybe that would validate your empty life a bit but it's simply not the case, sorry.
"Thick head of hair"? I said I'm basically an NW2 but don't like the growth around my fringe area, and this is saying I have a "
thick head of hair"? Nothing you can say will ever be reliable, and will never be taken seriously. Just like with debating societies affects on baldness, you twist things into how you want to see them. Now we all do this to an extent, but you're beyond the grasp of reality, most of the time. Show me where I said I have a thick head of hair.
As for "you've admitted you had a mental breakdown before" I think I'll use this as a prime example of how you blow things out of proportion:
My reaction to a photo was by no means rational, but just because I reacted badly, or had a "breakdown" in some small way, it doesn't make me generally insane just because you want everyone to be as nuts as you. Just because I've brought up a story from my past doesn't mean it still haunts me, I've since gone back and revisited all of those wedding photos (not long after I firstly refused to look through them), it would be somewhat irrational or at the very most debatably insane if I still freaked out at the thought of it.
a "breakdown" (implying, if that's what YOU would want to call it because it's me)
in some small way = Full blown lock me in a padded cell. To be clear, when someone uses quote marks, that means for lack of a better word, and when they say "in some small way", that normally means, in some small way. To jump from that to an extreme conclusion is desperate, even by your standards.
But the most important thing, and I won't stop asking about this, so get it out of the way now, show me where I taunted you for being bald, you can even give me a good idea of where I said and I'll find what you're talking about. If that is the case, even if it was completely unintentional and by my own error of judgement it looks like I'm taunting specifically for baldness, then of course I would apologise unreservedly. As the 2 examples I give above show, I'd say it's very unlikely, as what you say is not at all what it seems.
And for the record, I don't know if you're insane and I've even said this before, but you are a guy who claims to be insane, and claims everyone else around you is insane, and you seem so surprised when your opinions are deemed unreliable.
I'll even do a tl;dr for you being sick of my walls of texts, to concisely show how all of your points here were wrong;
-"constantly" stalking people would imply a consistent seeking and harassment of many members, not 3
-"thick head of hair" was never said by me
-"had a "breakdown" in some small way" doesn't mean having a full blown mental breakdown
-last and most importantly, back up what you say for once and show me where I specifically taunted you for being bald
- - - Updated - - -
Again, not even my words. That came straight from the cancer patients' mouth.
Do you know anything about how it's like to have cancer? Well they do, and what they say is:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/life/the-hardest-part-of-breast-cancer-was-losing-my-hair/
It's easy to get emotional and politically correct about this topic, but if even the cancer sufferers say themselves that the worst part of their disease is hair loss...
Even though you probably could easily find someone, somewhere, who would say that the superficial aspects of hair loss is the worst part of cancer, you managed to find someone who actually didn't even say this:
"I do think that losing your hair is an indication that you have cancer. It's what people attribute to cancer. If you are just vomiting all the time, you're just sick.
"I did want to be as normal as possible because people think you're sick and if people think you're sick, people take advantage of you because they know you're a weakling.
She's saying the hair loss is the big symbol of having cancer, and that was horrible for her. This was her main point, what it represented as her illness, I'm sure the superficial side was awful for her too, but it was what the hair loss represented that really hurt.
Even if you do find someone who says on a purely superficial basis that hair loss is the worst thing about it, that would be because DYING is implied as being the worst thing, it doesn't even need to be said. And even if they say dying isn't as bad as hair loss, they haven't experienced it yet, so just like your aggressive teen balding, how would they know?
Fred I wrote earlier how you've mellowed, but now almost in a rebellious way you've managed to show that you're more insane than ever. And unlike before, this isn't even entertaining, it's disturbing and practically disrespectful and offensive.
You are correct when you say people get sensitive over this issue, that does not mean that it makes you correct in the point you're making, which you seem to imply. You're saying "people don't like to hear the truth because it's non-PC!" and giving yourself way more credit than you deserve. If you're going to have a point to make over cancer you better make sure it's a damn good one, not one tiny fragment of a quote from some cancer victim somewhere, how is that in any way conclusive?
Please do everyone a favour including yourself, and shut up.