andrei_eremenko said:
yea...the fact is that you're skilled doctors from usa...are only usig strip dunno why! maybe it's easier to cut a piece of skin...and put the assistants to make grafts...and to implant there you need...and after that they give a bill with 10000$
![Smile :) :)]()
fue is much better...and for young people this real deal...in europe...fue is the power
HAHAHA.. What? Lol. no. Get your ignorance out of here.
1. Some of the best FUE doctors are in america. Dr. Umar is by far THE best FUE hair surgeon in the world, hes in california. Dr.Wolf, Dr. Cole, Dr. shapiro, Dr. Feller all are in North America and are some of the best in the world at FUE.
2. FUE is not nessecarily better than strip. There are limitations to FUE. FUE does not have as much graft survival rate and higher transectrion rate. FUE is probably best if you have 2000 grafts or less ever in your entire life. There also is a limit to how much you can realistically extract in the donor region per surgery as well. Strip can yeild much higher amount grafts.
3. FUE leaves a mark, and can be quite obvious even at buzz lengths of a 2 guard or less. Its not a miracle procedure. Anyone telling you otherwise is a f*ck and should die.
4. FUE is usually more expensive than strip, actually a lot more.
5. you just said in europe, fue is the power. Actually after reading that last sentence I realize your whole statement was a sarcastic remark.
6. Young people 25 and under should not be getting transplant. 25-30 should be a case by case basis, and strick rules should be developed.