The media is now spamming news about a "balding cure" because some JAK inhibitor got approved for areata in USA... I don't think they give a sh*t, the before / after picture of Areata recovery is flashy enough to publish it and get their clicks. Most Androgenetic Alopecia treatments are less flashy in result photos.Then why the lack of media converge and insane excitement. I mean finasteride worked on the monkeys and humans. So if it worked on monkeys it must work on humans. I mean obviously not a guarantee but it’s looking likely. But if it likely then it’s a hollygrail. Unless their is something they aren’t telling us.
I have never supplemented Magnesium in my life.Also GNC product has B-12
Magnesium has a calming effect on the body. Helps some to sleep better. Less stress hormones are therefore produced.
Perhaps less sebum.
I went and reviewed this.No, it doesn't make sense. TPRS is the loss of all TRPS1 function. Ambras syndrome is the loss of most TRPS1 function, 97-98% of it. Inhibiting TPRS1 by 98% causes massive hair growth, but inhibiting it 100% causes hair loss. That's not an expected result.
Do you have a source for this?Zero tprs1 elevates hdac4. Hairloss.
Very little tprs1 ( very little hdac4) sh*t load of hair.
Looks like I got it all wrong. Damn.Do you have a source for this?
Well that’s clearly not true especially When it’s one of the top gene hit markers especially for androgenic alopecia.More likely that hdac4 has no connection to hairloss.
Well that’s clearly not true especially When it’s one of the top gene hit markers especially for androgenic alopecia.
Judging by your last response in this thread isn’t for you man. Honestly only Pegasus probably understand anything I am saying no offense.
u Really don’t get it do you. You realize how strong the correlation is. The p values are ridiculous. And on top of that wnt being the major driving stimulator of hair growth is the same stimulator for bone growth. There are hundreds and hundreds of studies that show the genes that stimulate hair stimulate bone growth and in trps1 syndrome and ectodermsk hyperplasia bome doesn’t grow right. Neither does the hair. And a bone drug has already been shown to grow hair.So what? there are several other genes for baldness. Correlation doesn’t mean causation.
You just want it to mean something to prove your bone theory with hairloss, same as that guy with his scalp tension BS.
Your acting like a flat earther. Denying all the evidence.
So then hdac9. Which isn’t a bad call. I can’t remember where I read that all balding men of all ethnicities had this geneView attachment 182354
The causal gene is probably not HDAC4. More likely TWIST2 due to other Androgenetic Alopecia-associated variants around classic TWIST binding factors TCF4 and TCF12 and the known important role of TWIST2 in hair biology. It shuts down hair inductivity in dermal cells by recruiting HDAC2 to critical hair-inducing genes. HDAC2 deacetylates these genes -> closed chromatin -> transcription factors can't access them. (source)
To be fair it does look like HDAC/HAT imbalance is a major contributing factor.See these absurd connections you make just shows you’re really trying hard lol like with this theory.
Human body is extremely complex and interconnected. The fact you see varying results with hdac4 amount proves there’s another missing factor and it’s not the main factor, uh duh we know there are other genetic markers and factors that cause hairloss with direct connection.