DM5sadouche: Why would you assume I have photos to show you when earlier in the thread I said I have never used LLLT before? I am however going to start using it when my power supply gets here on Thursday. I was just defending LLLT because I find it annoying that, despite the evidence that it does work, people act like it is completely useless. These attitudes toward it stopped me from looking into it until recently, and I now wish I had looked into it sooner. I don't want other people to make that same mistake.
2nd post: I am not basing this on OMG's hair, lol.
baroudeur: I have seen some decent pictures from forum'ers, some even better ones from clinics, etc. Pictures are pretty useless though, unless there is a HUGE change in hair it is easy to attribute any change to lighting, hair length, angle, etc. Also, even if there is no difference in the hair but the pictures are taken a year a part or something that would seem pretty successful if they aren't using other treatments, would it not? I have a lot of hair, so I would be happy with stopping my shedding and any minimal regrowth/thickening would be great. Some people still report improving hair two years after starting treatment. Some don't report cosmetic benefits until 9+ months. It seems it can be a slow process for some and quick for others. Everyone seems to respond differently, but I think it is definitely worth looking into.
hairymonster: Yeah I am VERY responsive to anything that affects DHT/5ar and get strong sides from very mild ones like Nizoral, Fluridil. No point in me even trying finasteride. I know how bad I feel when I mess with my DHT/5ar receptors. Very few people even report getting systemic sides from things like Nizoral, and Fluridil was supposed to break down in water but I definitely got them. I think a couple of people on this forum had reactions to Fluridil. This is why I am so pleased to find a treatment that treats hairloss in a different manner.