I f*****g Had Enough Of Women. (warning, This Is Extremely Offensive)

[blackg]

Why the f*** am I going to show him how the public record of those transactions, it's a security risk to show where exactly your bitcoins go and how many you have, I don't want to get tortured by a crazy currycel for my private seed or wallet and pin to access them.

Back in the day I would have used them for interesting darkweb finds, but they're too valuable and their investment prospects too strong to bother at this point.

Also there are other more privacy orientated cryptos like Monero and Verge more applicable for shifty transactions.

Enough of the "currycel". Saurabhaj probably hasn't eaten that sh*t in like, 5 years.

Most Indians have advanced far from this primitive cultural staple and are now happily consuming American foods.
And so they should.

 

[Saurabhaj]

And stop acting like you're financially literate or understand financial terminology, I have a corporate finance degree you dunce, you're just embarrassing yourself.

First become entrepreneuer like me to even have a chance to talk with me on Investment.
I have taken decisions worth over one million US dollars at age of 21.

If there was any other guy,he would have lose sleep while taking decision.

 

[Afro_Vacancy]

China banned it via banning exchanges and use of it as payment, and the flow of Chinese Yuan into bitcoin did not drop. Major exchanges were closed, people used VPNs to buy and two months later smaller exchanges are being set up again. If you want to see how a ban would go, look at that or how the Australian ban of Pirate Bay went, the data shows that it made not even a blip on the useage of the site within a few days. VPNs exist, foreign exchanges exist, people will get around it. It is a decentralised, pseudo-anonymous system, how are you going to ban it? If China couldn't, what makes you think anyone else will, or that they will have the incentive?

The other issue is that if it continues to grow how it has over the past two years, the market cap will put it at a value under which holders have the capital to influence government. Investment banks and hedge funds are already considering dipping in, there are financial instruments like ETFS and futures markets coming in from major players, and Goldman Sachs and their CEO have shown interest. The government won't regulate something their donors stand to make money off, and they can collect taxes for.

The stupidity regarding cryptocurrency like your comments are rampant from people jealous of others getting over 500% returns on a ten thousand dollar asset in 6 months. Pure irrational attacks with nothing thought through and no evidence to their claims. It's really quite pathetic. Either way, give it three years and we'll see how stupid the naysayers have been.

But maybe if you block your ears and eyes and interest in the facts for long enough you can just pretend it doesn't exist, and then don't have to feel so bad when you're proven wrong.

The USA is not China. If the US government instructs Apple, Microsoft, Google, etc to block bitcoin, then they will comply.

A good example is internet piracy of video games and movies. For the most part the government ignores it, and people such as yourself believe that it's due to the incredible technology, that hackers have outsmarted the government and that we have a new era of freedom, a libertarian utopia where information can flow freely. The claims about bit torrent are identical to the claims about bitcoin -- that the technology is invincible, and thus government is impotent.

However, the truth is that the government (probably not the Chinese government lol) can shut down these piracy sites whenever it wants. A good example is "MegaUpload". MegaUpload was one of the largest piracy sites in the world. Like yourself and bitcoin, the users believed that Mega Upload was invincible because of advanced technology. One day MegaUpload got greedy, and it announced plans to not just do content distribution (re: piracy), but also content creation. In other words it was going to impede on Hollywood's monopoly of actual production of consumer art. It was then shut down within a couple days. Bit Torrent offered no protection.

I met a bitcoin connoisseur a few weeks ago. He had made a million dollars in profit -- good for him. I told him that the government would shut it down one day, and he told me (as you have) that this is impossible as bitcoin can be transferred on cell phones. What he doesn't realize is that the government can assume control of the cell phones whenever it wants. Apple, Microsoft, etc will comply, instantly, if Goldman Sachs says that the US dollar's reserve status is being undermined.

As long as the bitcoin is small, it will be allowed to proliferate. It might even be helpful right now as it's creating activity and liquidity. However, if it gets too large, it will be shut down.

 

[Afro_Vacancy]

Terrible film, but have fun. I recommend some Eric Rohmer films, French New Wave in general, also maybe Y Tu Mama Tambien or The Holy Mountain.

Or some Satyajit Ray. The Cloud Capped Star is a very good Indian film you should watch.

Dude, the pretentious of "avoid action movies, watch French films from the 1960s" doesn't convince anybody who knows anything about art. It just makes you look pretentious. Virtually all of the top consumers are able to enjoy both the classics as well as the cream of the crop of modern entertainment. There's no dichotomy between the two.

Have you heard of Paul Thomas Anderson? Would you tell someone who is watching The Terminator to stop watching that terrible film, that they should instead watch films by PTA? You would. But, PTA loves the Terminator. He dropped out of film school in part because he had a pretentious film professor who said that there was no real meaning to the terminator, that it was just a dumb blockbuster. He then understood that the instructor didn't know what he was talking about.

If you're actually knowledgeable about and interested in film, you won't just trash popular films and tell people that they should instead watch movies that have a high ranking from the British film institute. What you'll instead do is discuss all kinds of films insightfully.

*******

As for Thor Ragnarok, it's a very fun movie, it's got a critical rating of 93% / 7.5/10, it's hilarious, it has a great cast and was made by a respected Kiwi director. I enjoyed the scenes on the garbage planet.

 

[BaldyBalderBald]

Dude, the pretentious of "avoid action movies, watch French films from the 1960s" doesn't convince anybody who knows anything about art. It just makes you look pretentious. Virtually all of the top consumers are able to enjoy both the classics as well as the cream of the crop of modern entertainment. There's no dichotomy between the two.

Have you heard of Paul Thomas Anderson? Would you tell someone who is watching The Terminator to stop watching that terrible film, that they should instead watch films by PTA? You would. But, PTA loves the Terminator. He dropped out of film school in part because he had a pretentious film professor who said that there was no real meaning to the terminator, that it was just a dumb blockbuster. He then understood that the instructor didn't know what he was talking about.

If you're actually knowledgeable about and interested in film, you won't just trash popular films and tell people that they should instead watch movies that have a high ranking from the British film institute. What you'll instead do is discuss all kinds of films insightfully.

*******

As for Thor Ragnarok, it's a very fun movie, it's got a critical rating of 93% / 7.5/10, it's hilarious, it has a great cast and was made by a respected Kiwi director. I enjoyed the scenes on the garbage planet.

Your IQ is also substantially lower than mine.

 

[JeanLucBB]

The USA is not China. If the US government instructs Apple, Microsoft, Google, etc to block bitcoin, then they will comply.

A good example is internet piracy of video games and movies. For the most part the government ignores it, and people such as yourself believe that it's due to the incredible technology, that hackers have outsmarted the government and that we have a new era of freedom, a libertarian utopia where information can flow freely. The claims about bit torrent are identical to the claims about bitcoin -- that the technology is invincible, and thus government is impotent.

However, the truth is that the government (probably not the Chinese government lol) can shut down these piracy sites whenever it wants. A good example is "MegaUpload". MegaUpload was one of the largest piracy sites in the world. Like yourself and bitcoin, the users believed that Mega Upload was invincible because of advanced technology. One day MegaUpload got greedy, and it announced plans to not just do content distribution (re: piracy), but also content creation. In other words it was going to impede on Hollywood's monopoly of actual production of consumer art. It was then shut down within a couple days. Bit Torrent offered no protection.

I met a bitcoin connoisseur a few weeks ago. He had made a million dollars in profit -- good for him. I told him that the government would shut it down one day, and he told me (as you have) that this is impossible as bitcoin can be transferred on cell phones. What he doesn't realize is that the government can assume control of the cell phones whenever it wants. Apple, Microsoft, etc will comply, instantly, if Goldman Sachs says that the US dollar's reserve status is being undermined.

As long as the bitcoin is small, it will be allowed to proliferate. It might even be helpful right now as it's creating activity and liquidity. However, if it gets too large, it will be shut down.

"The USA is not China. "

Exactly, a more highly centralised country than the USA and one against the free market and person liberties to a greater extent. Not a good argument. "(probably not the Chinese government lol)" Not sure why this is a "lol", you don't seem to understand the economic or political situation of the country you're referring to.

"Apple, Microsoft, Google, etc to block bitcoin,"

Another stupid, meaningless statement. How are they going to do that, and what incentive is there to do it? This is the most important question, WHY would these companies do this when they are some of the biggest donors in the country and stand to gain from crypto themselves, as do the major investment banks? Corporate America will drive the decisions in this regard, and they will do what is best for themselves.

"One day MegaUpload got greedy, and it announced plans to not just do content distribution (re: piracy), but also content creation. "

Conspiracy theory nonsense. MegaUpload is not decentralised, again you don't understand the technology and yet feel free to insult it while exhibiting your lack of understanding.

"The claims about bit torrent are identical to the claims about bitcoin -- that the technology is invincible, and thus government is impotent."

And torrenting is invincible, you still have VPNs and hundreds of trackers sites to access whatever content you like whenever you like. Your argument supports mine, not your own. Shutting up a few centralised exchanges or crypto institutions has already happened, and is but a blip on the radar.

"As long as the bitcoin is small, it will be allowed to proliferate. It might even be helpful right now as it's creating activity and liquidity. However, if it gets too large, it will be shut down."

Futures markets being allowed by the US government, ETFs soon to be approved, and institutions getting in. Billionare Mike Novogratz setting up a 500 million $ crypto hedge fund soon. That doesn't look like a country considering getting rid of it. The new fed chairman also has suggested he is unconcerned and happy to embrace competing digital currencies.

I mean I don't know what to say man, you don't know what the f*** you're talking about, clearly haven't done your research and you lack basic understanding of the tech, but I've already made over 40gs in 4 months off a 10g investment and will continue to hold for the forseeable future. Constructing a diversified portfolio ought to include a portion of an alternative asset like crypto with non-correlated return to traditional equities markets, and there is nowhere else with the risk/return of crypto.

We'll see in a few years man.

 

[JeanLucBB]

Dude, the pretentious of "avoid action movies, watch French films from the 1960s" doesn't convince anybody who knows anything about art. It just makes you look pretentious. Virtually all of the top consumers are able to enjoy both the classics as well as the cream of the crop of modern entertainment. There's no dichotomy between the two.

Have you heard of Paul Thomas Anderson? Would you tell someone who is watching The Terminator to stop watching that terrible film, that they should instead watch films by PTA? You would. But, PTA loves the Terminator. He dropped out of film school in part because he had a pretentious film professor who said that there was no real meaning to the terminator, that it was just a dumb blockbuster. He then understood that the instructor didn't know what he was talking about.

If you're actually knowledgeable about and interested in film, you won't just trash popular films and tell people that they should instead watch movies that have a high ranking from the British film institute. What you'll instead do is discuss all kinds of films insightfully.

*******

As for Thor Ragnarok, it's a very fun movie, it's got a critical rating of 93% / 7.5/10, it's hilarious, it has a great cast and was made by a respected Kiwi director. I enjoyed the scenes on the garbage planet.

No I wouldn't tell them that, because the first two Terminators are very strong film, I judge a film on its merits. No pretension, and I know a fuckton more than you about cinema and have more diverse tastes because I double majored in English and film for an arts degree and have been into cinema and art history + the academic and technical side of it since I was 12. What you said is pure strawman because I said nothing of the sort. I have nothing against any genre, director, country of origin or actor, I appreciate films on their own merits as part of the medium as a whole.

PTA (who I love and was fanatical about in my teens) has very, very arthouse tastes primarily, but like myself is open minded to cinema as a whole.

I trash films that are populist dogshit for dunces.

 

[Afro_Vacancy]

I now make a point of not estimating people's IQs online. There are a lot of aspects of IQ tests that we can't access here, such as spatial visual awareness, reaction speed, working memory, et cetera. What we see is verbal comprehension and reasoning skills. Those are an important components to be sure, but not the whole picture.

 

[JeanLucBB]

First become entrepreneuer like me to even have a chance to talk with me on Investment.
I have taken decisions worth over one million US dollars at age of 21.

If there was any other guy,he would have lose sleep while taking decision.

lol "decisions over one million US dollars"? Like what? Who gave you the money?

First you say you're a high net worth individual which implies something like 1 million USD at 30, and now you're talking about throwing around a million at 21. Not saying you're bullshitting, but you can barely string together a coherent thought and don't exactly pay attention to facts, so sounds questionable.

 

[JeanLucBB]

I now make a point of not estimating people's IQs online. There are a lot of aspects of IQ tests that we can't access here, such as spatial visual awareness, reaction speed, working memory, et cetera. What we see is verbal comprehension and reasoning skills. Those are an important components to be sure, but not the whole picture.

I agree. I find it interesting though that when talking about bitcoin you're happy to make irrational, baseless claims based on a lack of factual and objective understanding, but when it comes to IQ talk you suddenly feel the need to critique this. Same with the lack of argumentitive precision when suggesting I brought up french cinema out of pretension or because I disliked action films, when I said nothing of the sort.

 

[Afro_Vacancy]

No I wouldn't tell them that, because the first two Terminators are very strong film, I judge a film on its merits. No pretension, and I know a fuckton more than you about cinema and have more diverse tastes because I double majored in English and film for an arts degree and have been into cinema and art history + the academic and technical side of it since I was 12. What you said is pure strawman because I said nothing of the sort. I have nothing against any genre, director, country of origin or actor, I appreciate films on their own merits as part of the medium as a whole.

PTA (who I love and was fanatical about in my teens) has very, very arthouse tastes primarily, but like myself is open minded to cinema as a whole.

I trash films that are populist dogshit for dunces.

You may or may not know more about cinema, in any case it's irrelevant as you analyze films from a perspective of pretentiousness, rather than understanding and appreciation of art. It's nice that you're able to respect the first two terminator films in 2017. That's because they're respected now and you're aware that other people respect them. However, if this were 1992 you'd be saying that they're trash in order to show off how smart you are.

Here's a hint: the brightest, most impressive people don't need to brag about their degrees nor constantly say "I'm smart ! I'm smart !" The fact that you constantly need to brag, and to feign an illusory superiority, is an indicator that you're insecure.

 

[BaldyBalderBald]

I now make a point of not estimating people's IQs online. There are a lot of aspects of IQ tests that we can't access here, such as spatial visual awareness, reaction speed, working memory, et cetera. What we see is verbal comprehension and reasoning skills. Those are an important components to be sure, but not the whole picture.

I know, it was just to point out the degree of pretension you're facing here

 

[JeanLucBB]

You have no right to talk bad for my people.

Its not wealth that defines people,its greed of lavish lifestyle that fucks people's life.
There is a reason why India with a population of over 1.2 billion is stable.
People have different expectations from life.

Not all people of India expect same thing.

Many people are happily living there livelihood.
Many do not dream for lavish life style.
Also,
I can come to US like a breeze by having US EB 5 visa but as a guy who was born in poverty,i do not get corrupted by any so called the american dream.

Why would i go to US if i have skill to earn here with zero corruption and morally.

Also I am against this.
For visiting as a tourist= Yes
For immigration= No


I do not buy any lavish things or anything like that.
Money cannot buy me.
IQ has no relationship in business.
Business success is governed by understanding trends and forward thinking.



I will reply you later.
I am currently busy.

I agree with most of this. It isn't exactly a baseless criticism to point out that slavery in India is still a problem, along with class based discrimination, poverty and immense issues of government corruption however.

I agree with your point on business success especially too.

 

[JeanLucBB]

You may or may not know more about cinema, in any case it's irrelevant as you analyze films from a perspective of pretentiousness, rather than understanding and appreciation of art. It's nice that you're able to respect the first two terminator films in 2017. That's because they're respected now and you're aware that other people respect them. However, if this were 1992 you'd be saying that they're trash in order to show off how smart you are.

Here's a hint: the brightest, most impressive people don't need to brag about their degrees nor constantly say "I'm smart ! I'm smart !" The fact that you constantly need to brag, and to feign an illusory superiority, is an indicator that you're insecure.

More strawmans. Dude you're a peasant at logical arguments despite acting like you're one of the most rational people on the forum. I like you but come on, use your head a bit here, you're smart enough not to throw around criticisms of things I clearly didn't say or think.

If someone recommends French cinema, maybe they genuinely recommend and enjoy French cinema. I could have just as easily told him to watch Die Hard, Hoop Dreams, German New Wave films, Kurasawa films, Altman films, Almodovar films, British realist films or French extreme horror films.

And if you're going to critique my claims of intelligence, try not to use logical fallacies when doing so. Just a thought. It isn't feigned if I'm genuinely the only ones making claims based in facts, and not insulting people for things they didn't say or imply.

 

[Afro_Vacancy]

"The USA is not China. "

Exactly, a more highly centralised country than the USA and one against the free market and person liberties to a greater extent. Not a good argument. "(probably not the Chinese government lol)" Not sure why this is a "lol", you don't seem to understand the economic or political situation of the country you're referring to.

"Apple, Microsoft, Google, etc to block bitcoin,"

Another stupid, meaningless statement. How are they going to do that, and what incentive is there to do it? This is the most important question, WHY would these companies do this when they are some of the biggest donors in the country and stand to gain from crypto themselves, as do the major investment banks? Corporate America will drive the decisions in this regard, and they will do what is best for themselves.

"One day MegaUpload got greedy, and it announced plans to not just do content distribution (re: piracy), but also content creation. "

Conspiracy theory nonsense. MegaUpload is not decentralised, again you don't understand the technology and yet feel free to insult it while exhibiting your lack of understanding.

"The claims about bit torrent are identical to the claims about bitcoin -- that the technology is invincible, and thus government is impotent."

And torrenting is invincible, you still have VPNs and hundreds of trackers sites to access whatever content you like whenever you like. Your argument supports mine, not your own. Shutting up a few centralised exchanges or crypto institutions has already happened, and is but a blip on the radar.

"As long as the bitcoin is small, it will be allowed to proliferate. It might even be helpful right now as it's creating activity and liquidity. However, if it gets too large, it will be shut down."

Futures markets being allowed by the US government, ETFs soon to be approved, and institutions getting in. Billionare Mike Novogratz setting up a 500 million $ crypto hedge fund soon. That doesn't look like a country considering getting rid of it. The new fed chairman also has suggested he is unconcerned and happy to embrace competing digital currencies.

I mean I don't know what to say man, you don't know what the f*** you're talking about, clearly haven't done your research and you lack basic understanding of the tech, but I've already made over 40gs in 4 months off a 10g investment and will continue to hold for the forseeable future. Constructing a diversified portfolio ought to include a portion of an alternative asset like crypto with non-correlated return to traditional equities markets, and there is nowhere else with the risk/return of crypto.

We'll see in a few years man.

The fact you've made money on bitcoin is utterly irrelevant to any point that's been made. I believe you that you've made money, that other people have made money and will continue to make money for some time. My statement is that it will be shut down if it gets too big. I didn't say when this would happen, and I certainly did not say that it will happen tomorrow.

The difference with China is that the US has the power to tell the big software companies what to do. For example we know from Edward Snowden, etc that the NSA can read all of our emails. They can read your gmail account whenever they want. It's a nice reserve power to have. Are they going to use it tomorrow, for anything? No. They're not even using it to stop common murders, which the general public considers a serious crime but the government less so. However, if the US dollar's reserve currency status was threatened, then the hatchet would come down.

 

[JeanLucBB]

The fact you've made money on bitcoin is utterly irrelevant to any point that's been made. I believe you that you've made money, that other people have made money and will continue to make money for some time. My statement is that it will be shut down if it gets too big. I didn't say when this would happen, and I certainly did not say that it will happen tomorrow.

The difference with China is that the US has the power to tell the big software companies what to do. For example we know from Edward Snowden, etc that the NSA can read all of our emails. They can read your gmail account whenever they want. It's a nice reserve power to have. Are they going to use it tomorrow, for anything? No. They're not even using it to stop common murders, which the general public considers a serious crime but the government less so. However, if the US dollar's reserve currency status was threatened, then the hatchet would come down.

I don't think we can know anyway for sure until this actually happens and we're at that point, but what I've seen suggests the system is censorship proof and the China bans along with the US positive actions in bringing institutional investors to the sector suggests the opposite to me. I'd be fine with being proved wrong here, it's all part of the fun.

 

[Afro_Vacancy]

More strawmans. Dude you're a peasant at logical arguments despite acting like you're one of the most rational people on the forum. I like you but come on, use your head a bit here, you're smart enough not to throw around criticisms of things I clearly didn't say or think.

If someone recommends French cinema, maybe they genuinely recommend and enjoy French cinema. I could have just as easily told him to watch Die Hard, Hoop Dreams, German New Wave films, Kurasawa films, Altman films, Almodovar films, British realist films or French extreme horror films.

If you're randomly (without context) recommending "the French new wave" then yes you're engaging in pretentiousness.

Saurabhaj said he wanted to see Thor 3. He was going to go to a movie theatre to watch a blockbuster. If you have a better recommendation, you would recommend a film of the same class, or a film that's relevant. However, you're bringing up a totally different kind of film, that he may or may not even be in the mood for.

Further, given that you consider him stupid, I doubt that you even think that he could enjoy those films. You were not recommending them for this enjoyment, you were recommended to show off how much you know, as you just did with "ie Hard, Hoop Dreams, German New Wave films, Kurasawa films, Altman films, Almodovar films, British realist films or French extreme horror films.", dude I don't give a sh*t about what you can name.

Saurabhaj is looking to watch a blockbuster. He wants to watch Thor 3. You believe that Thor 3 sucks and you. believe that you have tremendous knowledge of film. OK, then demonstrate it by giving relevant advice, recommend a better blockbuster, or a better movie currently in theaters.

 

[JeanLucBB]

If you're randomly (without context) recommending "the French new wave" then yes you're engaging in pretentiousness.

Saurabhaj said he wanted to see Thor 3. He was going to go to a movie theatre to watch a blockbuster. If you have a better recommendation, you would recommend a film of the same class, or a film that's relevant. However, you're bringing up a totally different kind of film, that he may or may not even be in the mood for.

Further, given that you consider him stupid, I doubt that you even think that he could enjoy those films. You were not recommending them for this enjoyment, you were recommended to show off how much you know, as you just did with "ie Hard, Hoop Dreams, German New Wave films, Kurasawa films, Altman films, Almodovar films, British realist films or French extreme horror films.", dude I don't give a sh*t about what you can name.

Saurabhaj is looking to watch a blockbuster. He wants to watch Thor 3. You believe that Thor 3 sucks and you. believe that you have tremendous knowledge of film. OK, then demonstrate it by giving relevant advice, recommend a better blockbuster, or a better movie currently in theaters.

You're right, I was being a bit of a dick; but those films are for enjoyment, and I think the average person could enjoy Altman or some Almodovar films, Die Hard or Y Tu Mama Tambien which I mentioned and they're not particularly mood killing or depressing. I've recommended obscure arthouse films to friends and a lot of them people tend to love when they get around to seeing, they just aren't typically exposed to that type of thing.

Also I did throw out some top notch currycel films for him like The Cloud Capped Star which is genuinely amazing.

To throw out some better blockbusteresque or action cinema, Fury Road, Die Hard, Kill Bill, John Wick, Heat, Children of Men, Robocop, Crank or the Bourne Ultimatum for some good ones.

 

[Saurabhaj]

I agree with most of this. It isn't exactly a baseless criticism to point out that slavery in India is still a problem, along with class based discrimination, poverty and immense issues of government corruption however.

I agree with your point on business success especially too.

JeanLucBB...
stop dreaming like your investment in Bitcoin is a decision of IQ 150.

You are talking about Bitcoin like you are the Inventor of this Bitcoin.
Even the inventor of Bitcoin is mystery that will never get solved.

You are just following bitcoin rage,there are million people doing same think like you.
So you are not a special person.

You are just proudly exhibiting a herd mentality.

 

[Saurabhaj]

Terrible film, but have fun. I recommend some Eric Rohmer films, French New Wave in general, also maybe Y Tu Mama Tambien or The Holy Mountain.

Or some Satyajit Ray. The Cloud Capped Star is a very good Indian film you should watch.

Ragnork is one of the best film i ever seen .

Full timepass.
I enjoyed watching it.

Asgard is in heart..