- Reaction score
- 620
And neither did I say you were claiming all members of each group looks better, but if you think any significant number look better bald you are kidding yourself and coping. The only guys who somewhat get away with it are black guys, and ironically you left them out at first.
White and Indian guys in particular will nearly always look worse. With super human genetics they might not drop much in levels of attractiveness, but usually they are going to drop 2 points minimum, as much as 4 or 5.
In fact many on here have understandably argued you NEVER look "better" bald, if incredibly fortunate you will look the same, but never better. And think about that, if you actually do have sh*t hair, you can buzz it short to stubble, and still have a frame on your face. Without hair, you just have a shiny cueball.
This guy looks "goofy" with hair?
He's like an 8, maybe 9! Statham is one of the best looking bald guys going and he still currently is only a 7. (Vin Diesel for example would be lucky to be considered a 6). Women like his appeal because he's really one of the few white bald guys who are still bangable, so his value inflates. As a normal guy, not a movie star, this dude is not ending up with Kelly Brook or Rosie Huntington-Whiteley:
I mean fine you didn't say they "all" look better but by making a blanket statement "White guys can look better bald" you put it out there as a vaguely general possibility for most dudes to aim for, in reality this is incredibly rare, arguably never happens. Even by saying a "significant number" I mean that's bullshit too, it's definitely not a significant number.
Now you've got it right, most bald guys look worse bald.
I love how the pic of him you did include has the actual hair cut off. Here he is from early movies when he had hair:
I stand by my assertion, he looks better bald. Also IMO that's a terrible pic of him now. This is more accurate: