That's because everyone here is as superficial as women are and just want to screw pretty women while at the same time judging them for not being attracted to them.
You're so obsessed with being an a**h** who judges people and to be as mean-spirited as people, it's gross.
What?
All women want attractive men, all men want attractive women, most people who aren't on forums and reddit 10 hours a day realise it can't quite work out that way. The red pill realists on here do indeed think it's hot chicks or nothing.
Isn't it ironic to call someone judgemental and then make the ridiculous claim that someone could possibly be obsessed with being an a**h**? Don't be ****ing moronic now, but you've been pissing me off because you keep chirping up about my "judgemental" nature and when I defend myself you have nothing else to say.
As long as you're being a bull****ting douchebag I'm going to keep calling you out on it.
You revel in these stupid posts you're making. You keep making the same incorrect, invalid, ignorant, irrelevant points that men on these forums should stop being hypocrites and go lead happy sexual lives with 2/10 women or 3/10 women. I qualify you as "obsessed" because you make many of these posts. You chastise others for wasting time lamenting their misfortune, yet you are always to be found in every single one of these threads lamenting those same people lamenting their situations.
If FredTheBelgian, or Hellouser, or Shookwun is providing a testimonial of some meaningful life experience they have, one can always bet that h.l. will be responding a mean-spirited, misguided, and incoherent refutation within a couple hours.
You call me on it and soon as I respond you piss off back in to your little hole, that's calling someone on something? Making up absolute bull**** and then when asked to present some proof just ****ing off away from the situation?
Where do I promote people to basically screw 2/10 down syndrome girls? I point out that everyone on here is obsessed with talking about goddess tier women who don't have interest in bald men but go for the full-heads, it's always the same crap. I'm actually trying to put things into perspective that it's not ALWAYS the 9/10 girl rejecting and mocking baldies and ****ing a fullhead, but morons like you see things too black-and-white to understand. With only 2 dimensional thought pattern you just assume because I'm saying give up on the goddesses, I'm enforcing everyone to **** obese women with mental disabilities. You can't possibly imagine a realistic in between, yet you probably imagine you and your buddies are the "realists".
If I'm so "obsessed" and I constantly make these posts then it shouldn't be hard to find even 1 recent one, so go ahead here's some help:
http://www.hairlosstalk.com/interact/search.php?searchid=2803842
You suck those 3 posters dicks, you've shown your bias in particular before for Fred, and I think they can look after themselves and actually make some points worth arguing (even if mis-guided) instead of your vague ad-hominem bull****. All your arguments against me are unfounded ramblings of a mad man like the quote above, and again, once called to actually provide anything, it's the last I hear from you.
Can you at least proof read your **** before you post it, or would that explode your own tiny mind. Along with the last post I made which I quoted you, what the **** is this?
"You chastise others for wasting time lamenting their misfortune, yet you are always to be found in every single one of these threads lamenting those same people lamenting their situations."
I know what you're trying to say, but for **** sake, "every single one of these threads" I haven't posted since like Monday, and at most I'm only ever posting in 2-3 threads at a time. Are you biased as hell much? Or just over-exaggerate to be a total ****?
I don't believe that personality is irrelevant, I consider it extremely important both for your partner's happiness and your own. With that said, the impact and relevance can be discussed all over the internet, from both good legitimate and incoherent sources. This community however is stated at the top to be concerned with aesthetics and specifically hair loss.Wait! You're going to reason with me on a respectful level, after starting off this exchange calling me a bull**** artist who is intent on being an a**h**?! Right OK. Great way to get a decent response from someone.
I'll be respectful towards you but completely honest, the fact you still think I'm peddling confidence shows you don't understand my posts. You want to lump me in with whatever positivity bull**** you hate, you see me making a remotely balanced response against some of the insane venting Fred and Hellouser spout, and you put me down as a SlyBaldGuy. I'm trying to be respectful but yes, completely honest, you don't seem like you can understand anything that's more than a 2-dimensional thought, it's either completely confidence or completely looks ("realists"), the in-between doesn't exist.
I'm not chastising people for being unhappy, I'm chastising them on making **** up to make others unhappy. If they want to use their own life experiences to say how they feel about life then fine, fair enough, if they want to say how one situation applies to everything, or every woman, ever, then they should be ashamed for trying to influence people negatively because of their own depression. And it's ****ed that you stand by it so obediently.
We'll clearly never see eye to eye on rambling insults and you've shown your forum dumbass metal by coming out with the ad-hominems and then pulling it back in an attempt to appear "above all that", so I'll just leave this concisely for now with what you're definitely wrong on;
-When have I ever said that confidence is the most important thing? I went to the effort recently of quoting many (very recent) posts of mine where I stated that looks are the most important thing, after it was insisted I'm peddling confidence as the bald man's saviour.
-Again, if I'm so obsessed with pushing the idea of guys ****ing 2/10 chicks, show me some evidence to support you "calling me out" on this.
-I don't know what that EvilLocks situation has to do with that quote.
That's because everyone here is as superficial as women are and just want to screw pretty women while at the same time judging them for not being attracted to them. And most here aren't even realistic to just try ANY woman (at least to start off) it's actually like most of the guys on this forum think they deserve 7+ chicks at least, anything else is damaging to the soul and identity.
I mean do the basic maths, statistically you all can't deserve that, never mind with recession or baldness.
Impact section summed up
I think it's because the BIGGEST thing we lose when we lose our hair is our ability to get women... you know those people that we marry and breed with? that we want to spend our lives with? There is no greater impact than that, so I don't understand what you expect from an "impact" section.
but morons like you see things too black-and-white to understand. With only 2 dimensional thought pattern you just assume because I'm saying give up on the goddesses, I'm enforcing everyone to **** obese women with mental disabilities.
Honestly, I don't care of impact on women. I care more that I look older.
A while ago when I was 23 I had a friend (of course NW0 at 30) and when we met I said I am 23, but probably said not clear since I am not a native speaker and a few months he thought I am 33.
JUST LOL nfire:
Another story was when I was talking with a guy and when he asked how old am I I responded 23. Guess what? He was surprised and thought I am in my 30th.
And I am only NW3. I just wonder how guys coping with NW4+ if even NW3 is a hell.
This disease robs your youth and this is the WORST thing not rejections by women.
I don't believe that personality is irrelevant, I consider it extremely important both for your partner's happiness and your own. With that said, the impact and relevance can be discussed all over the internet, from both good legitimate and incoherent sources. This community however is stated at the top to be concerned with aesthetics and specifically hair loss.
You do have some posts acknowledging the importance of looks, but it doesn't make up for the following:
But I'm going to discuss now your suggestion to "just try ANY women", which by the way is confirmation that you're encouraging posters to go after 2/10 chicks. "ANY" women includes 2/10, 3/10 and even 1/10 chicks. That's what you're encouraging people to do.
I've been doing that independently. I'm trying eHarmony lately. For the past while, I have "liked" every single profile suggested to me that lies within a geographic and age range, where the age range includes women older than me. Every single profile, including 1/10 women, 3/10 women, 7/10 women, and 10/10 women. This you say is a trivial task, it's all about lowering standards you say. I've been doing it as an experiment.
So in the past few weeks, out of 323 women "liked", 7 have liked me back (that's 2%), and 1 says she'd like to exchange emails (0.3%) though when I sent her my email after that she did not respond. It's not as easy as you imagine it to be. For the record I'm 5'11, NW2, not obese, and employed, so it's none of those things. I posted my picture on this forum and all I got was people telling me I look good or ok. Basically, every single one of those 323 women has lots of choices to choose from, even the fat ones, even the ones with horrible teeth. They all have choices.
Now as for your other suggestion, of "ANY woman", a couple months ago I went on 3 dates with a woman who was ... maybe a 4/10, I can't give you a precise number though in this case I'm not sure. Perhaps I should just settle for her? It doesn't work that way h.l. I gave it an honest shot. 3 dates. I put effort into them and put on nicer clothes and brought some wine and went to nice places. I felt nothing though. I wasn't attracted to her. There was no prospect of her being a starter girlfriend. I felt no attraction. In turn it was reciprocal. Women like to be craved and to be taken, but my heart wasn't into it. This has happened several times over the past few years. Your advice of just taking any women as a starter is not ideal, I know this because I've tried it.
The "basic maths" by the way are that a huge fraction of people end up alone, and another huge fraction end up in unhappy relationships. The fraction of people in mutually attracted and happy relationships is not high. A lot of people don't get married, over 50% of marriages end in divorces, and of the surviving marriages many are unhappy.
I have to add something here...
when i was in norwood 3/4.. i was getting comments like uncle and all that.
but now at nw6,many said "bhau"... a marathi word for elder brother who is influential personality or used as brother.
I look good at nw6 then nw3 because my look is closer to buzz look automatically.