I'm Just Going To Leave This Here...

[Rudiger]

They aren't helping most of us, except for those who want to destroy their emotional balance and well-being.

"Realism" = "Extremism"

 

[nameless]

They aren't helping most of us, except for those who want to destroy their emotional balance and well-being.

"Realism" = "Extremism"

Oh bullshit. Guys like me are just being honest and facing the cold hard truth whereas guys like you are hiding from the truth.

And hiding from the truth = WEAK.

 

[nameless]

"All saying in public"?
I doubt it.
Look, we all just need to take a deep breath and realise that these blanket generalisations are not helping any of us.

I didn't say that "All" are saying this in public. I said a "few" are saying it in public but "All" are saying it in private. And OK you're right that "All" women are not really saying this stuff in private but the overwhelming majority are. When I said "All" women are saying this stuff in private I really meant that it's very common. I realized that a few women don't get involved in these types of mean insults.

I thought we all realized that when the overwhelming majority of women are talking candidly to each other they call bald guys creeps and ugly when bald guys try to start-up romance with them. I thought we all knew that they do not want us to pick up on them.

 

[blackg]

I didn't say that "All" are saying this in public. I said a "few" are saying it in public but "All" are saying it in private. And OK you're right that "All" women are not really saying this stuff in private but the overwhelming majority are. When I said "All" women are saying this stuff in private I really meant that it's very common. I realized that a few women don't get involved in these types of mean insults.

I thought we all realized that when the overwhelming majority of women are talking candidly to each other they call bald guys creeps and ugly when bald guys try to start-up romance with them. I thought we all knew that they do not want us to pick up on them.

Oops... I humbly apologies. I did miss speak (write).
I did mean "private."

 

[nameless]

Oops... I humbly apologies. I did miss speak (write).
I did mean "private."

Gotcha. LOL!

 

[Rudiger]

"Reality" is not saying that 100% of people do this, or think that, it's not realistic to apply your little theories to absolute everything, it just makes it easier because you have binary thought patterns and you don't have to deal with the many complexities of life. Read some of my other posts (which Fred you were Liking recently) and you'll see that I am very well aware of how harsh people can be, but the moment your "Realism" is questioned you want to revert back to this idea that I'm some sort of slybald positivity pusher, which you know is bullshit.

Your idea that everything you think you know is a FACT because you think it- that there is the essence of delusional, you look at every situation and you apply some soft pseudoscience you've created to it, and you believe your own hype, even though ultimately all this reading you've done is a big f*****g waste of time (as apparently these theories don't even apply anymore to "attractive" guys like you who have sex) and it's hard to believe you've ever had a life outside of this.

"Realism" suits dumbfucks who can't think for themselves, simple as that.

 

[Afro_Vacancy]

"Reality" is not saying that 100% of people do this, or think that, it's not realistic to apply your little theories to absolute everything, it just makes it easier because you have binary thought patterns and you don't have to deal with the many complexities of life. Read some of my other posts (which Fred you were Liking recently) and you'll see that I am very well aware of how harsh people can be, but the moment your "Realism" is questioned you want to revert back to this idea that I'm some sort of slybald positivity pusher, which you know is bullshit.

Your idea that everything you think you know is a FACT because you think it- that there is the essence of delusional, you look at every situation and you apply some soft pseudoscience you've created to it, and you believe your own hype, even though ultimately all this reading you've done is a big f*****g waste of time (as apparently these theories don't even apply anymore to "attractive" guys like you who have sex) and it's hard to believe you've ever had a life outside of this.

"Realism" suits dumbfucks who can't think for themselves, simple as that.

"Realism" is a dumb name for a philosophy, it's like Ayn Rand calling her theory "objectivism" even though there's nothing objective about it.

"Ethical aestheticism" might be a better name, the idea being that how we treat other is a function of their appearance.

"Lookism" is also used currently to describe a related idea, of discrimination based on looks but not necessarily sexual, like racism and sexism the naming implies some people apply it worse than others, so it doesn't describe the ideas communicated on this forum.

 

[CopeForLife]

imagine you are in argue with your girlfriend and she uses superability and shout "At least I am not BALD" lol I don't know how to defence

 

[CopeForLife]

You can't argue with anyone once you're bald.

I remember arguing with my best friend while we were on a trip in Sweden.

As a Muslim, he was insisting that dinosaurs had never existed (yes).

After going back and forth, he runs out of arguments and lets out: "At least I have hair!"

He wins.

I cannot believe in this sorry. People can't be that retarded.

> best friend

 

[CopeForLife]

You'd be surprised.

And he has a law degree.

http://islam.stackexchange.com/questions/269/should-a-muslim-believe-in-dinosaurs

> People have seen the bones of the dinosaurs, but I have not with my own eyes. Even if I do, I know not that they indeed are from the dinosaurs.

It probably was hard to arguing with him...

But he has hair so he is superior to you.

It's like these shows on TV about debating on serious questions like aborts, drugs etc – where attractive and famous celebrities are invited and their opinion valued more than nerdy ugly creepy scientists and experts in same studio, because what? Because they're famous and beautiful!

 

[Rudiger]

Damn Fred with the dislike again, looks like an act of a desperate man.

"I won't disagree with you directly, but I will dislike your post and quote someone who agrees with me and work that way".

A new low is always hard to find.

 

[Rudiger]

Any woman will know her advantage over you, and she will use it. Make no mistake.

It's how you're given so many cool weapons in Metal Gear Solid 4, and they tell you: "Don't use any firepower, you have to infiltrate the base quietly!"

Yeah right, of course you're going to use the weapons. Same for women when you have no hair.

Ramblings of a f*****g madman. What the hell kind of analogy is this even trying to be? Why would a woman need to be discreet in approaching a man? Because that's how you're saying the goal needs to be achieved, actually this makes no sense in any way.

Dislike that you pathetic f***.

 

[CopeForLife]

Perfect analogy, especially since women actually enjoy overpowering men and making them suffer if they get the chance.

They see a window, an opening, you can bet that they'll take it. They won't think: "No, that would be mean."

Strong likes to dislikes ratio
Likes Received:
620
Dislikes Received:
100

 

[Rudiger]

You need to stop lying to your therapist, there's a lot more wrong than you let on.

And didn't you make a big fuss about how winnyblues has no life for disliking your posts? Even without your growing dislikes towards me, I'd bet winnyblues probably has more of a life than you (but this is based on how they aren't here very much, and you seem to be posting more than ever at all times).

At least as equally pointless of a life, I'll give it that.

 

[Rudiger]

Strong likes to dislikes ratio
Likes Received:
620
Dislikes Received:
100

I was happy to see that dislike number under his name until I saw a post from Fred that showed pretty much all 100 posts were dislikes from 1 poster (winnyblues). To be fair.

 

[Rudiger]

And he was so sad that you are now starting to get on his level. Are you officially transitioning into "troll" status or do you still value yourself as having self-worth on here?

As far as being "legit", I didn't read what winnyblues disliked and I'm guessing it was mostly random, but I can honestly say I'd dislike probably half of your posts, literally half of your posts are arrogant, ignorant, batshit crazy, nonsense telling other people they aren't allowed to have thoughts that don't run parallel to yours. If I went through 200 of your posts today you'd have at least 100 more dislikes, so not all of the dislikes may have been "legit" but I'd say they represented how a person could easily find posts of yours to hate.

I can't have opinions because I'm not an NW3, right? Rather, you don't have any way of arguing with my opinions because your own logic trips itself up so much you can't even deal with that, never mind someone challenging you on opinions. So instead you get to pull the "don't listen to the full head" card, pathetic.

 

[Rudiger]

You really need to learn how analogies work!

By that logic you have to live in Bangladesh to know the state of the economy there, when with a google search you'll instantly have an idea, and hours, then days, then weeks of research and thinking about it, you'll know more than most people living there.

This is really besides the point, I don't think I ever truly say what it's like to be bald, if I do, then prove me wrong. All I know is that you have no right to write so arrogantly that you know exactly what 100% of people are thinking and doing. You also express these opinions while absolutely destroying others in an attempt to look "strong" when you actually look like (and are) a nutcase.

You are scared of me having an opinion that's different than yours, you are even more scared that I constantly point out how your many continued hypocritical and conflicting opinions represent an underdeveloped and insecure, sad little man, who can't make sense of the world or others opinions.

So what do you do? Muddy my voice automatically because you can't deal with it. That's what insecure people do.

I think that's why you've started hitting the Dislike button and why I call it the act of a desperate man, you really don't like seeing me around here again but there's really nothing you can do about it. And hitting the dislike button, haha! That was going to work!

 

[marco75]

I wish I had no insecurities like you.

Some women have left me and they stated this as the reason: "You are insecure (about your hair loss)"

But of course, they have 0 insecurities. They are these perfect human beings.

I think they are right though, you have nothing to be insecure about because you are obviously attractive to them with hairloss but being insecure about it makes you seem vain and a little small minded. If you just took the view of not giving a crap and forgetting about it i'm sure your relationships would be better. It's isn't stopping you from getting girls but your insecurities are causing you to lose them.

 

[marco75]

It's not something you can control, so it's irrelevant.

I'm not vain for wanting the head of hair 95% of the people my age are enjoying.

Wanting to look normal =/= being vain.

Who wants to be normal, boring clone of every other guy. Stand out and you'll be remembered.

 

[Afro_Vacancy]

I was happy to see that dislike number under his name until I saw a post from Fred that showed pretty much all 100 posts were dislikes from 1 poster (winnyblues). To be fair.

There are posters like myself who can't be bothered to use the dislike button on anybody.

If somebody was truly objectionable, I'd report to the moderators. I don't think I've done that here, on other forums I might do it two or three times a year.