Is this real or just another fake news? CRISPR/Cas9 Therapy For Androgenic Alopecia: Moogene Medi

Micky_007

Experienced Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
378
Old news still dosent mean its would happen soon
April 2021 is old news? Didn't see it mentioned here. Before people were only referring to CRISPR using Cas-9 and worrying about potential off targets and the possible implications of permanently editing the genetic code.

CRISPRoff and CRISPRon is new technology which provides a solution to these things.

That is a big step in the right direction and great to see the advancements in this technology.

With advancements like this happening so soon, with so many thousands of scientists using the technology daily and trying to improve it, I'm sure we will see cures or at least highly effective treatment at some point in the not too distant future.
 
Last edited:

froggy7

Experienced Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
210
crispr will only be for people who still have hair and want to keep it?
 

Mandar kumthekar

Senior Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
339
There would be no cure in next 1000 years .we have to bear the baldness.because it is complex condition so cure could be more complex.
 

Micky_007

Experienced Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
378
There would be no cure in next 1000 years .we have to bear the baldness.because it is complex condition so cure could be more complex.

I hope you're just trolling because if you're not that's an extremely silly response.

They may not even need to know the exact molecules signals which cause hairloss to be turned on and off. They can return the state of the cells to a younger state when the Follicles were strong enough to fight off male pattern baldness.


They've fixed age related health problems in mice already a few years ago ago by injecting a very old mouse with the DNA found in the stem cells and embryo of mice.

(Previously the old mouse was towards the end of its life, very deteriorated movement and a hunch back similar to elderly people, it's hair was old looking as well)

The result was a much more youthful mouse, which had mobililty of a youthful mouse, NO hunchback, and it's hair looked sheek and shiny and youthful.

This btw was done using Gene Editing using CRISPR, and now there's been very recently even better advancements to the CRISPR technology.

There's 2 companies/people I know of that are using mRNA technology in operating this very concept of returning cells to a more youthful state

Take a look at Turn Biotechnologies using mRNA and possibly David Sinclair.

A LOT has changed in the advancements of technology. Next 100 years people will probably be comfortablly on Mars. Can't even imagine what would happen in the next 1000 years in terms of how exponentially technologically advanced humans will become.
 

Mandar kumthekar

Senior Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
339
I hope you're just trolling because if you're not that's an extremely silly response.

They may not even need to know the exact molecules signals which cause hairloss to be turned on and off. They can return the state of the cells to a younger state when the Follicles were strong enough to fight off male pattern baldness.


They've fixed age related health problems in mice already a few years ago ago by injecting a very old mouse with the DNA found in the stem cells and embryo of mice.

(Previously the old mouse was towards the end of its life, very deteriorated movement and a hunch back similar to elderly people, it's hair was old looking as well)

The result was a much more youthful mouse, which had mobililty of a youthful mouse, NO hunchback, and it's hair looked sheek and shiny and youthful.

This btw was done using Gene Editing using CRISPR, and now there's been very recently even better advancements to the CRISPR technology.

There's 2 companies/people I know of that are using mRNA technology in operating this very concept of returning cells to a more youthful state

Take a look at Turn Biotechnologies using mRNA and possibly David Sinclair.

A LOT has changed in the advancements of technology. Next 100 years people will probably be comfortablly on Mars. Can't even imagine what would happen in the next 1000 years in terms of how exponentially technologically advanced humans will become.
I wasn't trolling. I have been following breakthrougs for las 5 years and nothing solid has came out so far.
 

froggy7

Experienced Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
210
mice are simple organisms, not as complicated as humans, don't compare mice to humans, if it were that simple we'd all have thick hair already, and we're still at least 10 years from stemson
 

Micky_007

Experienced Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
378
mice are simple organisms, not as complicated as humans, don't compare mice to humans, if it were that simple we'd all have thick hair already, and we're still at least 10 years from stemson

I know not to compare mice to humans but I'm saying that the technology is there right now. Just like how when Tsuji and Stemson start, they do it with mice or pigs. That is the standard starting point of trials.

But what is exciting about this is:

1) Gene Editing Therapy using CRISPR is already being used IN HUMANS and has worked in a variety of diseases.

2) companies are using mRNA for the exact same concept. So the approach does seem to have a strong possibility of working
 
Last edited:

Micky_007

Experienced Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
378
I wasn't trolling. I have been following breakthrougs for las 5 years and nothing solid has came out so far.

Just like how in 1994 people thought the internet would be useless, and then Google was founded in 1999.

Just like how storage and processing speeds went from Gigabytes to Terabytes but people didn't think it was possible.

5 years ago we didn't have widespread use of CRISPR in HUMANS using Cas-9 nor mRNA

5 years ago we didn't have an even more advanced version of CRISPR than even Cas-9 called CRISPRoff and CRISPRon

5 years ago from a certain point in time we didn't know people like Elon Musk will introduce a battery via Tesla that could last 500 000 miles, more than the lifespan of some cars.

Point being, technology is moving rapidly, and you can never base the future based on the previous 5 years when it comes to new technology and inventions.
 
Last edited:

froggy7

Experienced Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
210
I know not to compare mice to humans but I'm saying that the technology is there right now. Just like how when Tsuji and Stemson start, they do it with mice or pigs. That is the standard starting point of trials.

But what is exciting about this is:

1) Gene Editing Therapy using CRISPR is already being used IN HUMANS and has worked in a variety of diseases.

2) companies are using mRNA for the exact same concept. So the approach does seem to have a strong possibility of working
Stemson has not yet published anything about pig research, we do not even know if he started it or not, they are just silent, it does not matter if they do not apply to humans, our time is limited, you live about 80 years, what do you need your hair for? this age? all that matters is youth and beauty all the rest is sh*t not life let's be honest
 

Micky_007

Experienced Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
378
Stemson has not yet published anything about pig research, we do not even know if he started it or not, they are just silent, it does not matter if they do not apply to humans, our time is limited, you live about 80 years, what do you need your hair for? this age? all that matters is youth and beauty all the rest is sh*t not life let's be honest

They did not publish their study because it is yet to be completed. They already received a massive $15 million in funding last month.

Investors wouldn't pour in that much of money if they didn't believe Stemson has something solid up their sleeve.

Although I'm not concerned with Stemson. I feel we may get quicker treatments via CRISPR and mRNA.

Also, you need to stop with your negativity again dude.

Work hard so you can afford the best treatments when they become available. There's probably going to be things to reverse aging too by the very fact their working on returning cells to a younger state in multiple approaches both mRNA and Gene Editing.
 

froggy7

Experienced Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
210
They did not publish their study because it is yet to be completed. They already received a massive $15 million in funding last month.

Investors wouldn't pour in that much of money if they didn't believe Stemson has something solid up their sleeve.

Although I'm not concerned with Stemson. I feel we may get quicker treatments via CRISPR and mRNA.

Also, you need to stop with your negativity again dude.

Work hard so you can afford the best treatments when they become available. There's probably going to be things to reverse aging too by the very fact their working on returning cells to a younger state in multiple approaches both mRNA and Gene Editing.
I agree with you, but the progress of the custom may skip many of us because we will be too old, what's on my hair at the age of 80?: D
 

Micky_007

Experienced Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
378
I agree with you, but the progress of the custom may skip many of us because we will be too old, what's on my hair at the age of 80?: D

I'm guessing you're probably in your 70's judging by your repeated use of the age 80....

I know it sucks having to wait during this interim being just inches away from real worthwhile treatments and it seems like you might not be able to maintain ground with your hair till then

But all I can say is, try Minoxidil and microneedling with a Derma pen.

Thread 'Very Impressive Dermarolling And Minxodil Results - From Tressless' https://www.hairlosstalk.com/intera...g-and-minxodil-results-from-tressless.117746/

Follow the instructions here of how to go about it.

Hopefully Minoxidil will give you some maintenance and regrowth for the 1.5 years approximately that we'd need to wait before Breezula and Kintor are released.

It's better to try it than do nothing and let your hair just get progressively worse.
 

froggy7

Experienced Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
210
I'm guessing you're probably in your 70's judging by your repeated use of the age 80....

I know it sucks having to wait during this interim being just inches away from real worthwhile treatments and it seems like you might not be able to maintain ground with your hair till then

But all I can say is, try Minoxidil and microneedling with a Derma pen.

Thread 'Very Impressive Dermarolling And Minxodil Results - From Tressless' https://www.hairlosstalk.com/intera...g-and-minxodil-results-from-tressless.117746/

Follow the instructions here of how to go about it.

Hopefully Minoxidil will give you some maintenance and regrowth for the 1.5 years approximately that we'd need to wait before Breezula and Kintor are released.

It's better to try it than do nothing and let your hair just get progressively worse.
I'm not 70 years old: D I don't understand only your optimism, I must admit that I am counting on great hair from Stemson in 10 years
 

Micky_007

Experienced Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
378
I'm not 70 years old: D I don't understand only your optimism, I must admit that I am counting on great hair from Stemson in 10 years

If you can wait 10 years for Stemson then you can easily wait 2 years for Pyrilutamide and probably a few later for GT20029 and a few years later for Moogene Medi's CRISPR treatment and possibly even Turn Biotechnologies mRNA treatment. All which should release before 10 years time
 

froggy7

Experienced Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
210
If you can wait 10 years for Stemson then you can easily wait 2 years for Pyrilutamide and probably a few later for GT20029 and a few years later for Moogene Medi's CRISPR treatment and possibly even Turn Biotechnologies mRNA treatment. All which should release before 10 years time
ok, will my hair grow back with these treatments?
 

JaneyElizabeth

Banned
My Regimen
Reaction score
2,033
You have no basis for saying that except hope. Where are the damn pictures dude? Everything is conceptual with you guys. Show us pics of someone who was bald with a full head of hair. Nobody would state what you just stated about any treatment including estrogen but you have it all figured out huh, and just two more years.

 

Micky_007

Experienced Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
378
You have no basis for saying that except hope. Where are the damn pictures dude? Everything is conceptual with you guys. Show us pics of someone who was bald with a full head of hair. Nobody would state what you just stated about any treatment including estrogen but you have it all figured out huh, and just two more years.


If you read my message you'd see I said progressively more with each treatment. Meaning GT20029 should have better regrowth than Pyrilutamide, and mRNA and CRISPR should have even better regrowth than GT20029. That is what I meant, and provided he is not a NW7 which is I'm assuming he isn't, hence I asked what Norwood he is.

But even if he is a NW7, the concept of Gene Editing and reactivation of the cells to a much more youthful state, thereby creating a new development/growth phase could have potential for even a NW7 with refined mRNA and CRISPR technology.

Also, I stopped watching the video you linked the moment he tried to downplay PFS, whatever he claimed to imply from that very moment became invalid. Can't take advice from someone with that little IQ.
 
Last edited:
Top