Maybe that's why Fidia is being so hush hush about it, or the fact Brotzu is really the only one who knows how to make the ingredients effective and stable.how are bigger, more serious companies not interested in this? its a goldmine assuming it works as well as those who used alternative, homemade versions claim
Both beps and brotzu himself have said stabilisation issues were solved last year. Brotzu confirmed this when asked by clockwise im sureI believe that the original lotion worked like Dr Brotzu told us from the beginning, however I think this lotion has massive stability problems and that’s the reason why Fidia did not want to show anything at the conference. Few people know about the lotion and showing good results would have caused headlines all over the world. Fidia did not want this to happen because the lotions stability problems and the don’t even know if they ever will Solve them. This is the only logical explanation I can find to this mess.
Also, how many pharmaceutical company’s answer mails and calls from random people asking about a drug in development? That would be incredible dumb when you think about the how competitive the market is.
With this said people should be careful with calling both Fidia and the Brotzus idiots when there can be an underlying cause to the situation we have no idea about.
Commenting on fidia's twitter another good way to show that people are waiting on an update. They can't delete other people's tweets so the admin for their account will always see it under their articles, enough people commenting may make a difference. No abuse though please keep it civil
Are you sure? I read something differentBoth beps and brotzu himself have said stabilisation issues were solved last year. Brotzu confirmed this when asked by clockwise im sure
He probably got banned for being a huge pessismist. I'm not that adverse to shaving my head, and yet here I am being one of the main voices for saying this lotion works as describedI believe someone warned you about this lotion scam two weeks ago but he got banned. He expressed his opinion to me as well in another hair loss forum. It’s too bad that’s folks are so easily manipulated but I guess despair makes someone not think rationally!
Lol if any of those people looked into why the presentation was trash or used some critical thinking to realize its not a scam...
Besides, my point is stop filling the thread with your pointless misgivings
Think you’re fast mate?1111 make a wish for brotzu
Yeah but are they continuing with the lotion? Nobody knowssssI don’t think Giovanni Brotzu would be experimenting several years with the effects on hair growth of a lotion he made for diabetes patients if it had no effect at all. The pictures of the little girl clearly show that the original lotion works.
and calling it a Scam? who are the scamers?
The doctor?
Fidia? Have they promoted it like gods gift to man kind? No they have been keeping quiet.
I have posted a lot of scientific articles and points about the company and process of the lotion. But I can lay off the argumentsI'm somewhere in the middle at this point - remaining objective.
But your standpoint is to the far end, and is essentially blind religious belief.
This thread and forum are meant for educated discussions. If your unfounded religious beliefs do not have the tolerance for opposing viewpoints, that's on you.
Okey, I didn’t thought I would write here for a while. But this I want to share and clarify after G. Brotzu wrote to me earlier today:
”When I said that 11% more hair had grown in the test, I did not specify that the tester was a woman over 55 years old.”
The Brotzus has only got tricoscopies of ONE tester from Fidia - a female tester over 55 years old. She had 11% more hair grown in the test, wich he said was alot at that age:
”Normally at that age, there is a reduction in hair, not an increase.”
Only Fidia knows the rate of testpersons under 30 years old. Giuseppe doesn’t have more data then this when it comes to increase of new hair.