Also I thought this was supposed to be released, well right about now summer of 2018.
And these homemade results showed Noticeable regrowth? The one thing I did notice about the photographs from the presentation, the only one I focussed on was the mail was the fact that he was clearly old and the researchers (Brotzu himself or whatever, I have not been following this closely ) have stated that it will only benefit hair that has been lost over a five-year period… He clearly had been a victim of diffuse thinning for years.
There are literally over 1000 pages on this thread, which page approximately has the homemade results I’m assuming photographs were provided is it rejuvenated the hype.Yeah it went back up when homemade results got posted.
Summer 2016 was the first release date.
Now Fall 2018...waiting for next surprise unofficial date.
Geez, even Duke Nukem Forever has been released...and it was crap
No, that’s not what I’m saying at all I am merely taking what the researchers have said about the product looking at the photograph and then extrapolating from there. Yes one would assume that they would want to showcase a photograph of a young 20-year-old suffering from early on hair loss with clear regrowth after treatment ( if the product was even capable of such a feat), The fact that they didn’t show a Photograph like that is highly suspicious, some would say disheartening. I also found it strange that they chose to showcase a non-Caucasian hair type to be frank... for a variety of reasons, one of which is it’s also suspicious the curly coarse hair type could be easier to manipulate lighting, position etc. to achieve a better after treatment photograph.So Brotzu accidently attached the worst results? Oh no, too bad, what a unfortunate twist of fate for this waterproof cure with a good smell.
I think the five year regrowth thing was never part of any clinical trial, but a Peter Molyneux-esque ‘you can do anything’ statement dropped by Lord Brotzu during an interview. Am I wrong here?
This is definitely conjecture and you know that… But I am definitely inclined to agree with you that that is highly likely the case. But again that is just conjecture, you have no concrete proof whatsoever - none of us do - that he had no clinical data of any kind to substantiate such a statement. However like I said I still find it highly probable that your assessment is fairly accurate.Yep this number was never justified and came out of nowhere, well actually came out of Brotzu's mouth, but like a random generated number in 1-10 range.
This is definitely conjecture and you know that… But I am definitely inclined to agree with you that that is highly likely the case. But again that is just conjecture, you have no concrete proof whatsoever - none of us do - that he had no clinical data of any kind to substantiate such a statement. However like I said I still find it highly probable that your assessment is fairly accurate.
Everyone knows that Todd Howard is the best liar.I think the five year regrowth thing was never part of any clinical trial, but a Peter Molyneux-esque ‘you can do anything’ statement dropped by Lord Brotzu during an interview. Am I wrong here?
Everyone knows that Todd Howard is the best liar.
Actually, what you said before was that you had inside information about the release / news in June. But that (also) never happened.
Just stop posting here.
I said if I will have news, I will share them. Yeasterday Giuseppe said that October is that unofficial release date/month that Fidia has.
But yes. I cant stop writing here, so it can stay in the Discord.
And these homemade results showed Noticeable regrowth? The one thing I did notice about the photographs from the presentation, the only one I focussed on was the mail was the fact that he was clearly old and the researchers (Brotzu himself or whatever, I have not been following this closely ) have stated that it will only benefit hair that has been lost over a five-year period… He clearly had been a victim of diffuse thinning for years.