- Reaction score
- 365
Try the Brotzu Lotion in November
Try in November
Try November
Try Nov
TriNov
Trinov
Hodorrrrrr!!!!
Try the Brotzu Lotion in November
Try in November
Try November
Try Nov
TriNov
Trinov
Try the Brotzu Lotion in November
Try in November
Try November
Try Nov
TriNov
Trinov
I cannot believe how butthurt people get about "oFf-ToPiC pOsTiNg" even in a meme thread, somewhere else I had a guy go apeshit on me because I mentioned a youtube video in one commenthello
stop posting in here
thanks
Thank you Lord for giving me male pattern baldness, so I can have the great honor of being part of this great community, in this wonderful thread. Amin
It’s crazy how high of a standard you guys are holding this treatment to... This is a treatment created by a doctor who is old as f***, who has basically zero influence on what Fidia does with it ever since he sold them the patent. Fidia on the other hand almost exclusively sells hyaluronic acid products and has never, to my knowledge, created a hair loss product. It’s just not fair to hold them to the same standard as companies such as shisiedo / replicel, Puretech, etc... are they f*****g up? Yes absolutely. Their marketing techniques and studies are straight up garbage. But can any of you say you’re honestly surprised? I’m not. They’re amateurs in this field. So let’s all stop whining and just wait for this to come out. Then, if it doesn’t live up to the hype, we can b**ch and complain all we want. We’re just talking in circles at this point.
Man, jokes really fly over your head.
It's pretty crazy that the Turkish-foreskin "ReBoost" was quickly thrown out by the community for the scam that it was, but this, despite so far being demonstrated to be useless, is so fervently defended.
You might want to reread what you quoted.Really..who’s defending Reboost?.
It's pretty crazy that the Turkish-foreskin "ReBoost" was quickly thrown out by the community for the scam that it was, but this, despite so far being demonstrated to be useless, is so fervently defended.
Dont worry pal, people are not stupid.
Reboost" was thrown to the dust bin because people did try it and got no sh*t. However, this lotion has never been released, so, no one tried it yet.
In the presentation at Sitri, they mentioned the following parameters and the results. Are they lying ?
View attachment 98985
View attachment 98986
Meanwhile in Office:
A: what shall we do? the lotion doesnt work on male pattern baldness. the study outcome is bad and there is also no topic left, for more fake before/after pics.
B: Shave these bastards, time will give them regrowth. HAHAHAHA
A: Sry, we are riding a dead horse...
B: But we have created the biggest hype ever when it comes to hairloss solutions. 1259 sides and a few million views. There are enough idiots, who will buy the lotion without evidence.
A: ?
B: Milk the cow.
The p value is a statistical key factor. If it is low the derivation is low. They basicly say the number of hair did increase (without saying how much) but the increase was nearly in every person.1. how do they know hairloss decreased significantly after 1 month if they weren't monitoring the patients in the previous period?
2. where are the actual numbers? i get that they might have wanted to make it simpler for the needs of the presentation, but was the actual data published in any pertinent journal, by some institution or by Fidia themselves? "significantly" doesn't do it for me.
sorry if the questions are stupid, I barely know what p-value is. its just that @That Guy made me think when he said there are no formal publications about this product at all, anywhere
its all summaries, hearsay, the doctor's facebook posts, alleged lotion users from private forums, legal administration documents and other secondary sources
Guys, you can always find investors and start your own research team and come up with a cure. No matter how mediocre FIDIA may be, it warms my heart that new stuff is coming out.
To the moon!
The p value is a statistical key factor. If it is low the derivation is low. They basicly say the number of hair did increase (without saying how much) but the increase was nearly in every person.