I'm all for accidental discoveries, but the cascade of favorable accidents that all happened to work much better than before is borderline suspicious.
1. He accidentally discovered PGE1 + Liposomes had an effect on the hair of diabetic limbs.
2. He accidentally discovered on the first try that the PGE1 precursor DGLA was equivalent/better than accident #1.
3. He accidentally discovered on the first try that casually adding s-equol increased the effectiveness of accident #2 10 fold, but much less so on accident #1
--
4. He casually added L-carnitine. We have no idea if this does anything or not, but because decades old research said it helps cell metabolism, it's safe to assume he figured there's no harm in adding it. (Which was his same thought process behind adding s-equol)
We don't know how many other ingredients he tested, but given how long it takes to test if hair has been affected positively, not to mention how completely ambiguous results can be, it seems he just picked equol and carnitine out of a hat and somehow got lucky 3+ times where each accident was exponentially luckier and conveniently more effective than the accident before it.
I'll say it again, the science behind this lotion seems like it can definitely do something to hair. What strongly supports this is, ignoring the kids with areata, the fact that it even grew non-aesthetic patchy strands of hair on adults with areata is proof that it has at least some positive effect on follicles. Theoretically, this could mean even greater news for recent androgenetic loss. Though the differences between areata and androgenetic with regard to the arrector pili muscle still is of concern (androgenetic eventually loses contact, areata doesn't)
Ultimately, this post is just more pointless fodder in wait for the sitri presentation, but f*** it who cares.