- Reaction score
- 421
Happy 800 page. We f*****g did it guys
It should work better for males. The S-Equol would reduce DHT in the follice, but also agonize the estrogen beta receptor. Estrogen is more effective in men for growing hair.Just like the results with minoxidil are variable. Some girls have had amazing results with minoxidil alone
So I wonder if topical treatments favour better results with females vs. males in general ?
i’m waiting for 1000 to hit before 14th april.Happy 800 page. We f*****g did it guys
Well had my first brotzu lotion dream . I dreamt I was applying it and my hair looked pretty fantastic . it was a pretty sweet dream until I woke up in the middle of the night with a hangover. Im still in bed with a headache, and reality is a little painful this morning .
With regard to how effective this is going to be....
Run a little survey. Approach people in your life, whether your parents, significant other, teacher, whoever. Simply tell them that you are eagerly awaiting to find out how effective an Italian hair loss lotion can be and that you think it might cure baldness. Note their reaction. Bubble burst. There’s your answer.
This is legit one of the most retarded posts i have read in this past week, but im not surprised that this came from you.
The average IQ of this forum has cratered since 2015 or so. I remember when this place used to be reasonably intelligent. Now it's just retard after retard, and they all have sh*t figured out. The less you know, the more you think you know.
Lol, the delusion. Yes, this place is NASA and Dr. Brotzu is President Kennedy allocating a billion dollar budget.
The moon landing was a concentrated, well-researched, and well-funded endeavor that captured the interest of the world. It wasn’t discovered by “accident” by an obscure Italian doctor tinkering in his laboratory.
In before “respected family” and “muh Nobel Prize (nomination).” Just lol.
Just like the results with minoxidil are variable. Some girls have had amazing results with minoxidil alone
So I wonder if topical treatments favour better results with females vs. males in general ?
From what I understand it takes 1-3 years for the calcification and fibrosis to occur, so the hair follicles dont have a thick layer of skin over them. My temples have receded and I'm losing my widows peak; the thing is I have tiny blonde vellus hairs in the bald spots.thats easy to understand. female patterns have diffuse patterns for most and men have receiding pattern. Women seek hair thickening in general and men want to regrow slick bald area... That's a totally different challenge. I don't believe the "5 years regrowth" and "it's better if you are under 30" claims. this is misleading.
Examples:
Don't worry for the guy who is over 40 and is barely starting a diffuse thinning; any Workin treatment will do wonders for him.
For the guy in early / mid 20s and is already high norwood that mean he has agressive receiding hairloss which is purely genetic: that's tough to regrowth even 1 year loss. because follicle are kinda dead.
False, there was one particular presentation on the subject of Fibrosis that was posted in hellousersFrom what I understand it takes 1-3 years for the calcification and fibrosis to occur, so the hair follicles dont have a thick layer of skin over them. My temples have receded and I'm losing my widows peak; the thing is I have tiny blonde vellus hairs in the bald spots.
It's hard, unless this has the strenght of topical estrogen. Don't raise your hopes too high.My guess is if you still have vellus hairs it will completely nourish those hairs back to life
Thanks for more information, I hadn't seen a lot in regards calcification and why it occurs. Though I don't get what 5 years regrowth means if calcification isn't done after 5 years? Maybe it's a loss of progenitor cells nourishing the hair follicle, or lack of blood flow and nutrient channels...False, there was one particular presentation on the subject of Fibrosis that was posted in hellousers
Japan Hair Congress 2017 section, the conclusion was that complete follicle death occurs only in elderly people (https://www.hairlosstalk.com/intera...omote-vellus-to-terminal-reconversion.109789/). I guess this also raises the question whether wounding creates new hair or revives already existing ones.
1-3 years claim is also false. I still have vellus in all areas where I used to have hair, this is what we call bald spots even if there are tiny vellus that are invisible unless you get close to the mirrior. It's been 5 years since my first hair turned into a bald spot and a tiny vellus is still there.
It's hard, unless this has the strenght of topical estrogen. Don't raise your hopes too high.
It has been shown that S-equol, which is a biosynthesized estrogren, stops DHT. I posted it a little earlier in the thread.It's hard, unless this has the strength of topical estrogen. Don't raise your hopes too high.
It will all depend on your personal response, didn't Brotzu say he tested this on someone who was bald for 20 years and it still revived some hairs?Thanks for more information, I hadn't seen a lot in regards calcification and why it occurs. Though I don't get what 5 years regrowth means if calcification isn't done after 5 years?
I'm wondering if the regenerative capacity is alluding to the progenitor cells that help the hair grow, and seem to be lost. When I looked into shisheido, from what I understood it didn't offer perfect regrowth of the scalp even with stem cell cultivation of the DHT resistant stem cells being injected. This was somewhat briefly alluded to a loss of progenitor cells, an extra aspect hair growth responsible for the anagen phase being completed.It will all depend on your personal response, didn't Brotzu say he tested this on someone who was bald for 20 years and it still revived some hairs?
Study summary from https://www.hairlosstalk.com/intera...romote-vellus-to-terminal-reconversion.109789: Advanced age (aka senile age) negatively impacts hfDSC number and function (both self renewal and differentiation capacity) and may contribute to the diminished regenerative capacity of aged hair follicles.
This new study challenges our view that hairs permanetly die after there is a bald spot. You have to be a man in his 60s or 70s to have permanently dead follicles according to its logic.
Another interesting take: The development of this lotion didn't even last a decade. Therefore, I doubt there was someone who tested this lotion for a period that is longer than 2-5 years. Plus, issues of stability and constantly changing formulas did not allow to show its full potential and it only may be shown after we get or don't get the results. What if the results increase over time? What if what was supressed with DHT, gets slowly revived, taking into account the damage and the duration of baldness. Then, after 5-10 years of using this lotion people could turn into fullheads. However, as I said I'm quiete skeptical even if that Alopecia Totalis woman regrew some peach fuzz in 2 years (or something) suffering 40 years of baldness.
.