He has some recession, that's technically balding, but normal. What I mean is I don't think he was ever going to go beyond a mature hairline considering his age, ethnicity, and density. If you're going to recede more than that you generally will have more thinning on top along with it.
Can you post your prior progression of male pattern baldness prior to zix? So people will stop accusing
It's to measure the aggresivity of your hair loss to use it as a referenceNot sure why this is even a discussion
I’ve shared photos of clearly thinning areas of my scalp , temple points and hairline
It's to measure the aggresivity of your hair loss to use it as a reference
Update
Had my hair checked out by my derm
I was starting to lose ground during lockdown (crown, hairline) when I had no access to LLLT and was just using zix.
Since regrown thinning hair on my crown and hairline. Zix alone might not be enough.
Yeah, most men will hit NW2 at some stage, but then most men will go bald to some extent.
The reason NW2 is included on the chart you posted is because it's often considered hair loss. Norwood originally said that NW3 is the first stage of hair loss, but if someone is NW2 and miniaturising, they are balding.
In my view, there's a difference between the mature hairline and NW2. For example, I had a juvenile hairline until I was around 23. I then developed a mature hairline, with no further recession, until around 27, at which point my hairline (very slowly) began receding. I have a NW2 hairline now, 7 years later, at least according to B*sanga.
In reality, most people won't notice the difference between NW2 and mature hairline, it's only people on hair loss forums that debate these trivial issues.
Hey @worm, any update on your progress?
So still maintianing with zix? The loss u mentioned earlier during lockdown was a fluke?