Nothing Can Compare To The Feeling Of Sex And Love

[Exodus2011]

I can't agree more, because it puts in to actions all the feelings you have for someone and you get that back. It sort of transcends that gloating general feeling of "I'm getting pussy" because it's way too intimate for you to care about the outside world whatsoever, that no longer is even a factor when it comes to "making love" because it's something deeply personal for you and your partner.

There are moments with someone you love where you feel deeply affectionate for them because they say or do something that really shows pure kindness and it can almost make you well up, there's beautiful moments of realisation when some action of theirs really reflects how genuine and kind they are.

In those moments there really isn't any rivalled feeling in the world in terms of your own contentedness, but having passionate emotional sex with someone takes all those moments and puts it in to an action that obviously just feels incredible anyway.

I can't really imagine crying after sex, I've heard that can be a thing and heard about this years ago before I ever had sex, and laughed at the idea, how a guy must have emotional issues if he's going to cry after sex. But although personally I don't get overwhelmed in the form of "crying" I understand that some people do, and there can be an overwhelming feeling directly after having sex.

I can understand it now.

doesn't the realization that its largely looks ruin this lovey dovey part ? or does the natural primal urge for love take over ?

 

[Min0]

cocain&heroin > sex&love
scientific fact

 

[IdealForehead]

I can relate fellow alpha brehbrah, not only do I get laid but I get laid SO much that I'm so bored of all the pussy I get and all the f*****g I do constantly.

Why do all the chicks feel they can use my (large) man meat stick as their play thing when I'm a human being who needs to have conversations sometimes

Just crankin' that humblebrag up to 11, lol "if you ever had your fill of sex (like me )"

Sorry but I'm calling humblebrag because the point itself is such nonsense, and in my opinion created just to remind us you get lots of pussy and needed a creative way to include that. I actually used to know a guy who made this exact same point in front of me and friends "I'm just getting bored of f*****g now! It's just so repetitive! Same, mindless bonking" of course he got a lot of sh*t for that. His other humblebrags were saying things like "ah man I haven't fucked in ages- it's been nearly a whole week".

I can give you more of his humblebrag lines in case you ever run out.

Anyway, sex is never, never boring, literally even 5 minutes after you've had it, you may think you aren't interested in that moment but if even an image of a woman catches you right, and the horn kicks in, you discover you actually aren't bored of it whatsoever.

And that's 5mins! Never mind half an hour, or half a day. Even wanking, which everyone probably thinks they get bored of as a teen going in to adulthood, but realistically at any time of day if you were to actively look up p*rn or hot chicks, you'd be at it all the time, something about us learns to control it as it's anti-social and distracts from doing other things.

Although there's probably plenty of guys on here that jerk like 6 times a day. Good on ya.

You should stop giving him sh*t for these posts. They're just motivated by your own jealousy and envy. I'm jealous too. But it doesn't invalidate his experience and I'm sure it's true for him.

Every Chad gets bored of sex after a while. Why should he have to censor himself just because people here have fragile egos? Censorship is sh*t. Trying to censor someone under the guise of being "anti-humblebrag" is bullshit too.

Johnson can get laid all he wants as far as I'm concerned, post as much about it as he likes, and still be miserable if he likes. He spends all his time on this site just like we do.

 

[Rudiger]

doesn't the realization that its largely looks ruin this lovey dovey part ? or does the natural primal urge for love take over ?

No that's kind of missing the point, when you get past a young age you become self-aware that looks largely determines your feelings for someone, I was probably late teens until this really kicked in and I was completely aware that looks is a huge part of attraction, especially initially.

So the point is that when someone you're already attracted to, shows a side of themselves that is breathtakingly honest, humble, selfless, in a way they aren't even aware of, then it clicks in a way that's like "oh, I guess there's more to this than just how she looks". And that's what makes the feeling so overwhelming, when it catches you by surprise.

Now of course, if she didn't look how she does then you wouldn't have got to the stage of finding this out, and you should be aware of this, but that shouldn't take away that people can be personally compatible with each other on top of looks-based attraction.

You should stop giving him sh*t for these posts. They're just motivated by your own jealousy and envy. I'm jealous too. But it doesn't invalidate his experience and I'm sure it's true for him.

If I say having more money than you can spend is boring after a year or two and you stop caring about money (which I have said and is true for me) no one likes on me about it. It's just the f*****g truth.

Every Chad gets bored of sex after a while. Why should he have to censor himself just because people here have fragile egos?

What exactly do you know about my love life? Maybe I should humblebrag more.

I'm only remotely mentioning that because it's just a sign of idiocy when a person makes unfounded assumptions and I thought it's necessary to point that out.

I don't recall him ever claiming Chad numbers, in either quantity or quality, so again, pretty stupid assumption. He might have had a lot of sex with the same person repeatedly though. It is kind of remarkable what humblebragging can achieve because you'd think from his reputation on here he's a gigachad lol.

Also how would you know how a Chad feels about sex? Do you always consistently talk about things you don't have the slightest clue about? Because I'm getting that impression from this post.

 

[IdealForehead]

No that's kind of missing the point, when you get past a young age you become self-aware that looks largely determines your feelings for someone, I was probably late teens until this really kicked in and I was completely aware that looks is a huge part of attraction, especially initially.

So the point is that when someone you're already attracted to, shows a side of themselves that is breathtakingly honest, humble, selfless, in a way they aren't even aware of, then it clicks in a way that's like "oh, I guess there's more to this than just how she looks". And that's what makes the feeling so overwhelming, when it catches you by surprise.

Now of course, if she didn't look how she does then you wouldn't have got to the stage of finding this out, and you should be aware of this, but that shouldn't take away that people can be personally compatible with each other on top of looks-based attraction.



What exactly do you know about my love life? Maybe I should humblebrag more.

I'm only remotely mentioning that because it's just a sign of idiocy when a person makes unfounded assumptions and I thought it's necessary to point that out.

I don't recall him ever claiming Chad numbers, in either quantity or quality, so again, pretty stupid assumption. He might have had a lot of sex with the same person repeatedly though. It is kind of remarkable what humblebragging can achieve because you'd think from his reputation on here he's a gigachad lol.

Also how would you know how a Chad feels about sex? Do you always consistently talk about things you don't have the slightest clue about? Because I'm getting that impression from this post.

I'm guessing you don't get nearly as much sex as you'd like or with the girls you would want or you wouldn't be so triggered every time Johnson says something about how "I get lots of matches on Tinder/Bumble and dates but it's no big deal to me". I don't care either way. You could f*** no one or everyone. I just think it's stupid how you feel the need to police every post he makes and try to give him sh*t 24/7 with these obsessively long posts every time he posts about his success with women in the way he does.

I have had loads of good looking male friends over the years. My cousin last weekend was showing me his POF account on his phone and all the dozens of girls trying to date him which he is completely ignoring because he doesn't even care. Some girl came up to him from behind in the club we were at at one point and started grabbing him and licking his neck. He's polite, so he tried to push her away gently, but he clearly wanted to tell her to go f*** off. Most of the good looking guys I've been friends with are like Johnson. They get so used to the positive attention it means nothing to them after a while and they talk about it as casually as I would talk about eating a sandwich.

 

[Rudiger]

Censorship is sh*t. Trying to censor someone under the guise of being "anti-humblebrag" is bullshit too.

Johnson can get laid all he wants as far as I'm concerned, post as much about it as he likes, and still be miserable if he likes. He spends all his time on this site just like we do.

Similarly should I censor myself about how my hair is growing back to a juvenile hairline yet I still hate my life because it might "trigger" someone? That's f*****g nonsense too.

You added more so I'll give it the attention it probably doesn't deserve.

If he just talked about getting laid then fine, if it's relevant to discussion then no problem, lots of other guys talk about getting laid and do you see me (or others) complaining about it?

The difference here is that it's irritating because it's a constant presence of a guy who is seeking validation. He can be a good poster sure, but I hate reading his opinions when the penny drops "oh, he's just writing this to remind himself he has sex/is above average looking".

For his own peace of mind it's an awful way to be. I think as humans we've all felt that urge to talk about something that impresses other people, or is simply to feel good about yourself, whether it's about girls or money or your promotion etc there comes a point where we seek out opportunities in conversation to bring up an achievement, and it's really unhealthy actually.

I still get that unhealthy urge but having a few close friends around me has taught me better, they are people who often achieve great things and are incredibly humble about it, wouldn't even mention it unless you ask. We should all strive to be like that, not just to stop irritating others but just for ourselves.

 

[IdealForehead]

You added more so I'll give it the attention it probably doesn't deserve.

If he just talked about getting laid then fine, if it's relevant to discussion then no problem, lots of other guys talk about getting laid and do you see me (or others) complaining about it?

The difference here is that it's irritating because it's a constant presence of a guy who is seeking validation. He can be a good poster sure, but I hate reading his opinions when the penny drops "oh, he's just writing this to remind himself he has sex/is above average looking".

For his own peace of mind it's an awful way to be. I think as humans we've all felt that urge to talk about something that impresses other people, or is simply to feel good about yourself, whether it's about girls or money or your promotion etc there comes a point where we seek out opportunities in conversation to bring up an achievement, and it's really unhealthy actually.

I still get that unhealthy urge but having a few close friends around me has taught me better, they are people who often achieve great things and are incredibly humble about it, wouldn't even mention it unless you ask. We should all strive to be like that, not just to stop irritating others but just for ourselves.

Humility has no objective value. People can be as passively arrogant as they want in my opinion. I'd rather hear the opinions of people like Johnson. I think it's important to maintain perspective. Why do you think guys like Kurt Cobain still shoot themselves in the head? Beautiful, beloved by millions. All the sex in the world he could have, and he still wanted to kill himself.

Very objectively we can observe having sex with attractive girls is not some panacea and if someone wants to point that out from their own experience I'm happy to hear what they have to say.

What Johnson said in this thread is exactly what I have heard from every other good looking friend I've had in one form or another. They all say and believe this sh*t. So what's the problem?

 

[Exodus2011]

No that's kind of missing the point, when you get past a young age you become self-aware that looks largely determines your feelings for someone, I was probably late teens until this really kicked in and I was completely aware that looks is a huge part of attraction, especially initially.

So the point is that when someone you're already attracted to, shows a side of themselves that is breathtakingly honest, humble, selfless, in a way they aren't even aware of, then it clicks in a way that's like "oh, I guess there's more to this than just how she looks". And that's what makes the feeling so overwhelming, when it catches you by surprise.

Now of course, if she didn't look how she does then you wouldn't have got to the stage of finding this out, and you should be aware of this, but that shouldn't take away that people can be personally compatible with each other on top of looks-based attraction.

.

i mean this can happen with everyone, people being selfless, people do it all the time. i mean i guess you bring it up in regards to a girlfriend because you already have that sexual/romantic attraction to them right? the combination of the feelings is a lot more than just that same typical human compassion from just a friend?

 

[Rudiger]

I'm guessing you don't get nearly as much sex as you'd like or with the girls you would want or you wouldn't be so triggered every time Johnson says something about how "I get lots of matches on Tinder/Bumble and dates but it's no big deal to me". I don't care either way. You could f*** no one or everyone. I just think it's stupid how you feel the need to police every post he makes and try to give him sh*t 24/7 with these obsessively long posts every time he posts about his success with women in the way he does.

I have had loads of good looking male friends over the years. My cousin last weekend was showing me his POF account on his phone and all the dozens of girls trying to date him which he is completely ignoring because he doesn't even care. Some girl came up to him from behind in the club we were at at one point and started grabbing him and licking his neck. He's polite, so he tried to push her away gently, but he clearly wanted to tell her to go f*** off. Most of the good looking guys I've been friends with are like Johnson. They get so used to the positive attention it means nothing to them after a while and they talk about it as casually as I would talk about eating a sandwich.

Every post he makes?! I barely point out 10% of his actual humblebrags, David pointed out one yesterday which I saw but he'd already covered it. You're talking absolute sh*t, for the most part I ignore the constant humblebrags, but it's healthy as a reminder sometimes "people still can see you're doing it".

And I'm hardly "triggered" when I wrote a fairly sarcastic mocking response to it, triggered would be blowing up entirely. People over-use the word with the intention of shaming someone for reacting to anything in any way at all, but in my opinion it's normally the weakest form of attack because it's so easy, and really exposes someone with a poor arsenal, or zero substance.

But that form of being "bored" of sex is different to actually having someone in your bed or beside you, ready to go. They simply don't want all the hassle that comes around the optimal goal, which is having sex, which is something nobody gets bored of.

Humility has no objective value. People can be as passively arrogant as they want in my opinion. I'd rather hear the opinions of people like Johnson. I think it's important to maintain perspective. Why do you think guys like Kurt Cobain still shoot themselves in the head? Beautiful, beloved by millions. All the sex in the world he could have, and he still wanted to kill himself.

Very objectively we can observe having sex with attractive girls is not some panacea and if someone wants to point that out from their own experience I'm happy to hear what they have to say.

What Johnson said in this thread is exactly what I have heard from every other good looking friend I've had in one form or another. They all say and believe this sh*t. So what's the problem?

OK so focusing more on the point, we're divided here in a very simple way- you believe what he's saying, and I do not.

Considering the source, I believe he just brought up the "I'm so bored of sex" comment to show he actually gets sex, there's a lot of guys on here that if they said it, I probably wouldn't have thought anything of it. Does that seem unfair? Well the context is important, and I believe that once again he's written another fluff piece that was about being acknowledged and validated, and was cringey in it's transparency.

We won't agree on that basic idea so whatever, believe what you want. Like I said above I really don't know why you think I do this "every time" I've barely wrote to the guy since his return and ignore most of what he says, if I want to point things out from time to time then oddly you're trying to censor my apparent censorship. Clearly you're a fan of his posts but I know some people like the acknowledgement that his irritating and unhealthy humblebrags do not go un-noticed.

 

[Rudiger]

i mean this can happen with everyone, people being selfless, people do it all the time. i mean i guess you bring it up in regards to a girlfriend because you already have that sexual/romantic attraction to them right? the combination of the feelings is a lot more than just that same typical human compassion from just a friend?

Hmmm I wouldn't say it's considerably different than a platonic relationship, except you are obviously attracted to friends generally with a lot less emphasis on looks, so it's not as much of a "surprise" when they do something that you really appreciate.

As far as people doing truly selfless acts all the time well, we have different experiences of humanity. I find even in the most apparently selfless acts there's always an undercurrent of motivation there for some reason, and I find the majority of people have really bad qualities that regularly shine through.

 

[Exodus2011]

Humility has no objective value. People can be as passively arrogant as they want in my opinion. I'd rather hear the opinions of people like Johnson. I think it's important to maintain perspective. Why do you think guys like Kurt Cobain still shoot themselves in the head? Beautiful, beloved by millions. All the sex in the world he could have, and he still wanted to kill himself.

Very objectively we can observe having sex with attractive girls is not some panacea and if someone wants to point that out from their own experience I'm happy to hear what they have to say.

What Johnson said in this thread is exactly what I have heard from every other good looking friend I've had in one form or another. They all say and believe this sh*t. So what's the problem?

being socially adjusted does have value in the sense that people won't want to chill with you if you're enough of an a**h** braggart. yes its a problem if someones an a**h**, that much should be obvious.

i mean i do agree that we shouldn't have echo chambers but literally all social situations involve adjusting to each other.

 

[IdealForehead]

Every post he makes?! I barely point out 10% of his actual humblebrags, David pointed out one yesterday which I saw but he'd already covered it. You're talking absolute sh*t, for the most part I ignore the constant humblebrags, but it's healthy as a reminder sometimes "people still can see you're doing it".

And I'm hardly "triggered" when I wrote a fairly sarcastic mocking response to it, triggered would be blowing up entirely. People over-use the word with the intention of shaming someone for reacting to anything in any way at all, but in my opinion it's normally the weakest form of attack because it's so easy, and really exposes someone with a poor arsenal, or zero substance.

But that form of being "bored" of sex is different to actually having someone in your bed or beside you, ready to go. They simply don't want all the hassle that comes around the optimal goal, which is having sex, which is something nobody gets bored of.



OK so focusing more on the point, we're divided here in a very simple way- you believe what he's saying, and I do not.

Considering the source, I believe he just brought up the "I'm so bored of sex" comment to show he actually gets sex, there's a lot of guys on here that if they said it, I probably wouldn't have thought anything of it. Does that seem unfair? Well the context is important, and I believe that once again he's written another fluff piece that was about being acknowledged and validated, and was cringey in it's transparency.

We won't agree on that basic idea so whatever, believe what you want. Like I said above I really don't know why you think I do this "every time" I've barely wrote to the guy since his return and ignore most of what he says, if I want to point things out from time to time then oddly you're trying to censor my apparent censorship. Clearly you're a fan of his posts but I know some people like the acknowledgement that his irritating and unhealthy humblebrags do not go un-noticed.

I'm not a fan of his posts. I dislike Chads almost universally (for having what I don't have). I can be honest about that.

I'm just less of a fan of reading your reactions to his posts. And that's nothing personal against you. I just think it's annoying as f*** when every time (or 10% of the time as you say) Johnson says "I get laid" there will be 5 paragraphs of Rudiger arguing about the semantics of how it was worded and what it really means.

I really don't mean that in any personal way or as an attack on you beyond the specific scope I'm referring to. If I meant anything in a more general sense we wouldn't be talking right now, since I would have just put you on ignore like certain other users. The ignore function works very well here. Maybe people should use it more.

 

[Exodus2011]

Hmmm I wouldn't say it's considerably different than a platonic relationship, except you are obviously attracted to friends generally with a lot less emphasis on looks, so it's not as much of a "surprise" when they do something that you really appreciate.

As far as people doing truly selfless acts all the time well, we have different experiences of humanity. I find even in the most apparently selfless acts there's always an undercurrent of motivation there for some reason, and I find the majority of people have really bad qualities that regularly shine through.

selfless is a gold standard of morality, people in general definitely do take care of each other largely that cant be argued. and about the ulterior motives, idk i'm halfway a moral consequentalist, i think it matters much more the actual results of your actions than the intent. kinda like graces vs works in christianity

 

[Saurabhaj]

cocain&heroin > sex&love
scientific fact

Felt pity for few people i have seen suffering from this addictions.

100$ per gm: just lol at this people.

There is one guy who was son of extremely powerful leader.
If he had no drugs addictions,he would have been billionaire by now.But because of addiction,he was left worthless and forgotten.
Even his wife left him in few months after she found out he was drug addict.

 

[Exodus2011]

Felt pity for few people i have seen suffering from this addictions.

100$ per gm: just lol at this people.

There is one guy who was son of extremely powerful leader.
If he had no drugs addictions,he would have been billionaire by now.But because of addiction,he was left worthless and forgotten.
Even his wife left him in few months after she found out he was drug addict.

just lol at how infectious "just lol" is lmfaoooo. another persons got it xD

 

[blackg]

One of the best feelings in life:


Feeling of falling in love with the person you like and she says yes to your proposal.

It is wonderful. It's really what we're all here for.

 

[Rudiger]

just lol at how infectious "just lol" is lmfaoooo. another persons got it xD

Hahahaha, I don't know why it's so funny that even he's doing it now, but I find that hilarious.

 

[Afro_Vacancy]

Humility has no objective value. People can be as passively arrogant as they want in my opinion. I'd rather hear the opinions of people like Johnson.

All personality traits lack objective value.

The issue with some of Johnson's posts is that the veneer of spin, ideology, etc makes them hard to interpret. I agree with you that posting life experiences is maximally valuable, and in that regard @Wolf Pack, @shookwun, and @WhitePolarBear are better posters. They're more self-aware. Though there's nobody in this world who can be trusted to be 100% reliable, they are "more" trustworthy to provide a decent summary of the relevant information that can aid in understanding social processes, rather than in validating them.

 

[Afro_Vacancy]

Every post he makes?! I barely point out 10% of his actual humblebrags, David pointed out one yesterday which I saw but he'd already covered it. You're talking absolute sh*t, for the most part I ignore the constant humblebrags, but it's healthy as a reminder sometimes "people still can see you're doing it".

And I'm hardly "triggered" when I wrote a fairly sarcastic mocking response to it, triggered would be blowing up entirely. People over-use the word with the intention of shaming someone for reacting to anything in any way at all, but in my opinion it's normally the weakest form of attack because it's so easy, and really exposes someone with a poor arsenal, or zero substance.

But that form of being "bored" of sex is different to actually having someone in your bed or beside you, ready to go. They simply don't want all the hassle that comes around the optimal goal, which is having sex, which is something nobody gets bored of.



OK so focusing more on the point, we're divided here in a very simple way- you believe what he's saying, and I do not.

Considering the source, I believe he just brought up the "I'm so bored of sex" comment to show he actually gets sex, there's a lot of guys on here that if they said it, I probably wouldn't have thought anything of it. Does that seem unfair? Well the context is important, and I believe that once again he's written another fluff piece that was about being acknowledged and validated, and was cringey in it's transparency.

We won't agree on that basic idea so whatever, believe what you want. Like I said above I really don't know why you think I do this "every time" I've barely wrote to the guy since his return and ignore most of what he says, if I want to point things out from time to time then oddly you're trying to censor my apparent censorship. Clearly you're a fan of his posts but I know some people like the acknowledgement that his irritating and unhealthy humblebrags do not go un-noticed.

In fairness to @JohnsonDDG, it may be that he's bored of sex with the women he's boning. @hairblues speculated a while back that he's a "lazy lion" or something, that he settles for easier women rather than putting in the effort to make a connection with the women that could make him happy.

 

[Rudiger]

In fairness to @JohnsonDDG, it may be that he's bored of sex with the women he's boning. @hairblues speculated a while back that he's a "lazy lion" or something, that he settles for easier women rather than putting in the effort to make a connection with the women that could make him happy.

I know what you're saying and OK, I should probably clarify- I am in no way certain this was a humblebrag as there is the possibility of sincerity behind it, and as I say if other members had posted it I'd have probably given them the benefit of the doubt that they're expressing a genuine thought.

However it's just so consistent that his posts are either suspiciously in this manner, or blatantly, and to me this is pretty close to blatant. Not quite hard evidence but, I gave the example of a guy I used to know who humblebragged constantly, and like him it just falls completely in line with how Johnson normally brings up his take on things. There's a significant amount of times that it just points to the fact he posts to remind us/himself he does fairly well with women, and I don't understand it.