Re: that sounds believable
collegechemistrystudent said:
OK. New question. If scalp DHT levels (I'm guessing that means blood scalp) decrease by 38% due to propecia, what percentage of DHT do you think is inhibited inside the cell?
A fairly recent study done by a bunch of big-name deramatologists found that Propecia decreased scalp DHT levels by somewhere around 60% to 70%. So NOW you know why I take those numbers with a grain or two of salt!
If they vary so much from one study to another, what's the point of even discussing any specific numbers as if they really mean anything at all?
collegechemistrystudent said:
Hmmm....one other question. If DHT is produced in the cell and slowly leaks out in small quantities, and it is metabolized in the liver and not in the cell, that means the cells produce it at the same rate it leaks, just enough to replace what leaks while the build up in the cell goes to receptors. Since the amount that leaks is small, and the amount that is produced is small, and the cell traps enough to keep a high load, this explains why DHT levels take time to return once knocked out...OK that was not a question.
Ok, I just made-up the following little analogy: You have a water faucet which is cracked open a little and has been pouring a small, steady stream of water (DHT) into a big water barrel (the bloodstream) on a continuous basis. The water barrel isn't full to overflowing, though, because there's a small hole near the bottom of it which water is leaking out of (liver elimination of DHT). As the barrel started to get full, the increased water pressure forced more water out of the hole at a greater rate, until the barrel has now reached an equilibrium at a nearly-full level. The water flow from the faucet is now equal to the water leaking out of the hole in the barrel.
Someone now comes along and SHUTS OFF the faucet suddenly (takes a dose of finasteride). Water is now no longer coming out of the faucet, so the level in the barrel is now starting to go down rather quickly as the water keeps gushing out of the hole. After about 24 hours, it's at its lowest point in the big barrel.
But wait!! Something else has happened, too! Shortly after the first person shut off the water faucet, another person came along and started to
slowly crack the faucet open again, just a little bit at a time. At first they opened it just enough to have a slight drip-drip of water, then a little while later they opened it a tiny bit more, then later a tiny bit more, then later still a tiny bit more, over a space of a couple of days or so (the slow regeneration of the 5a-reductase enzyme). The net result is that the water level inside the barrel slowly started rising again as water started to flow from a slow trickle back to its original rate, but it took the barrel up to a week or two for the water to reach its original level.
Bryan