metalheaddude
Senior Member
- Reaction score
- 9
Thats why I want to wait till im at least 30 before doing a hair transplant.
HatPrisoner91 said:gillenator said:Remember, just because the rate of male pattern baldness progression has been slow, that's NOT AN INDICATION nor any guarantee that it will continue that way. Read enough on the forums in the medicinal categories and you'll see guys posting how OUT OF NOWHERE their hairloss went into high gear. The rate of progression is UNPREDICTABLE. :shock:
I can attest to a rapid loss. I mean I went from thinning in the crown and slight receding hairlines to a full blown Norwood 6 in less than 2 years.
gillenator said:Remember, just because the rate of male pattern baldness progression has been slow, that's NOT AN INDICATION nor any guarantee that it will continue that way. Read enough on the forums in the medicinal categories and you'll see guys posting how OUT OF NOWHERE their hairloss went into high gear. The rate of progression is UNPREDICTABLE. :shock:
StrangeKarma said:How long were you thinning for before it did that?
s.a.f said:Well thats the thing is'nt it? But in my experience if you're a Norwood 2.5 at the age of 45+ then you're probably safe. However if you're in your 20's and receeding quickly then you're probably headed for a high degree of hairloss.
Looking at your relatives father, grandfathers, uncles hair and how that went is a good indicater.
pmill said:i agree with Eureka 100%,i think that you should get the procedures done and i think in the next 10 years something better will be out to multiply donor hairs so you wont be short of them