- Reaction score
- 732
Yes but I would do 1 mg/ml for the sake of simplicity
PDRN, an unknown powerhouse for androgenic alopecia
- Thread starter FollicleGuardian
- Start date
- Reaction score
- 1,104
Wouldn't deactivation of AR signaling in scalp tissue clean up all the different pathways (prostaglandins, subcutaneous fat layer, etc.)?
So then you just gotta focus on regrowth, because all the other pathways are a cascade thing activated by androgens?!
I am pretty unsure.
So then you just gotta focus on regrowth, because all the other pathways are a cascade thing activated by androgens?!
I am pretty unsure.
- Reaction score
- 732
Just made a discord to make it simple to share results, in one place. Everyone is welcome to join:
discord.gg
Discord - Group Chat That’s All Fun & Games
Discord is great for playing games and chilling with friends, or even building a worldwide community. Customize your own space to talk, play, and hang out.
- Reaction score
- 732
I’m not sure. I would assume so.
You're doing right to not give a f*** about sides because there's probably not a single. Good luck for your depression.
- Reaction score
- 732
Don't let any topical get into your eyes. DMSO is generally non-toxic up to 5%. The only reason to use more than that is if a solute requires more to fully dissolve.
Edit: While I would recommend against using more than 10% DMSO, it's worth noting that in a lot of studies the control is 100% DMSO and it often shows an increased hair count. That would imply that it's probably not toxic enough to our hair follicles to be terribly concerned about.
Last edited:
- Reaction score
- 732
Thanks chief!
- Reaction score
- 637
Lol whaaaat, I saw your hair dude. It’s great.
- Reaction score
- 732
Bro, your hair looks great!
https://www.hairlosstalk.com/intera...ut-need-opinions-on-this.129354/#post-1907875 Bro you literally have nothing. like Norwood -10000
- Reaction score
- 1,336
Error - Cookies Turned Off
Used scihub to browse to it. We use topical so less goes systemic but still... Tbh I can't wait to stop pouring crap on my head daily. Ideally I reincarnate as a lifetime nw0 and never have to deal with this sh*t at all.
Lol. He has mental issues for sure
Yeah, lucky bastard stressing because his hairline doesn't touch his eyebrow wtf.
- Reaction score
- 732
F*ck :/ Are you joining the switch over to DMI?Error - Cookies Turned Off
faseb.onlinelibrary.wiley.com
Used scihub to browse to it. We use topical so less goes systemic but still... Tbh I can't wait to stop pouring crap on my head daily. Ideally I reincarnate as a lifetime nw0 and never have to deal with this sh*t at all.
I've switched to once daily applications, and that does make it less of a hassle. It's also easier on the scalp.Error - Cookies Turned Off
Used scihub to browse to it. We use topical so less goes systemic but still... Tbh I can't wait to stop pouring crap on my head daily. Ideally I reincarnate as a lifetime nw0 and never have to deal with this sh*t at all.
Last edited:
I don't like the formulation of the cream as it seems a greasy stuff. The watery solution of the vials seems a better option.
I don't understand how DMSO would help permeation of a large hydrophilic molecule.
I think microneedling is the only way to push through the channels some of this DNA mix.
Hereby a picture of an agarose gel showing the profile of a run of salmon DNA:
ibb.co
I see most of the intensity of staining is at approx 3500 bp, that converts to approx 130 kDa.
Ethanol shouldn't be a proper vehicle, as it decreases the solubility of DNA: full precipitation at 70% ethanol and 35% isopropanol.
Cationic surfactant cause formation of DNA nanoparticles because of compaction...but this could be a different formulation that might not have the same effect.
I don't understand how DMSO would help permeation of a large hydrophilic molecule.
I think microneedling is the only way to push through the channels some of this DNA mix.
Hereby a picture of an agarose gel showing the profile of a run of salmon DNA:
Screenshot-20210207-223601-Drive hosted at ImgBB
Image Screenshot-20210207-223601-Drive hosted in ImgBB
ibb.co
I see most of the intensity of staining is at approx 3500 bp, that converts to approx 130 kDa.
Ethanol shouldn't be a proper vehicle, as it decreases the solubility of DNA: full precipitation at 70% ethanol and 35% isopropanol.
Cationic surfactant cause formation of DNA nanoparticles because of compaction...but this could be a different formulation that might not have the same effect.
- Reaction score
- 637
Hmm, so maybe microneedling at a 2mm length once every two weeks to mimic mesotherapy. But I’m not sure if that’s frequent enough to really take advantage of this...
Maybe use the low kDa version everyday with a smaller needle length. I think 0.5 helps with up to 75 kDa