Post Malone says he shaved his head cuz he was tired of balding and thinning

justinbieberscombover

Senior Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
3,037
not shaved but buzzed will suit him more
Doubt it.

cab49fd2f047d8e24?width=1100&format=jpeg&auto=webp.jpg


Closest thing I found to how he would look buzzed:

How-Prince-Harry-looks-bald-761377.jpg
 

WaccWaccWacc

Experienced Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
493
You are absolutely wrong.
I am not. But that is your opinion and it’s fine.
Post Malone looked better with his hair grown out a bit cuz he still had a lot of hair and a decent hairline. Even someone like me could just barely tell that he started balding.
I agree, he had enough density that it didnt need to come off. But if he was bothered enough by it and took it off and still has it off what does it say? Lmao
And in those pics you posted, Lebron looks better AFTER the transplant like the pic on the right, rather than the shitty hairline on the left pic which always got him bullied. You also clearly don't follow Lebron cuz he still HATES the shaved look and copes with fibers.
... you clearly dont follow lebron. The shaved head pic is before his transplant. And clearly he looks better with his fronto-temporal transplant + fibers now because it frames him face. But balding lebron compared to slick shaved balding lebron is a no brainer. Like I said you’re too attached to hair to see the difference.
You think Prince Harry would look better if he shaved his head? He would look like a cancer patient. At least now the hair adds coloring to his head, frames his face and doesn't leave his head shape fully exposed.
Prince harry would look 100000x better shaved. The thing about prince harry is his hairline is still intact so from the front it still frames his face. However from the back its the first thing your eye is drawn to. You can clearly see the dead patches of grass that are layed out across his head. It just looks straight awful.

No point in arguing this further. Just differing opinions. Sometimes when I see men in public holding onto 4/5 strains of hair that are long and cover their entire scalp I wonder what the f*** is going on in their head but clearly its the same thing thats going on in your head.
 

justinbieberscombover

Senior Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
3,037
... you clearly dont follow lebron. The shaved head pic is before his transplant. And clearly he looks better with his fronto-temporal transplant + fibers now because it frames him face. But balding lebron compared to slick shaved balding lebron is a no brainer. Like I said you’re too attached to hair to see the difference.

Prince harry would look 100000x better shaved. The thing about prince harry is his hairline is still intact so from the front it still frames his face. However from the back its the first thing your eye is drawn to. You can clearly see the dead patches of grass that are layed out across his head. It just looks straight awful.

No point in arguing this further. Just differing opinions. Sometimes when I see men in public holding onto 4/5 strains of hair that are long and cover their entire scalp I wonder what the f*** is going on in their head but clearly its the same thing thats going on in your head.
This is before the transplant:

5a0a6cb3-0c13-41ae-8396-f1e3a28fd122-jpeg.jpg


This is after:

944eacd3-c389-4e93-8b49-a2cc0372ed47-jpeg.jpg


Looks better, because he finally has a unified line over there instead of a stranded island.
 

justinbieberscombover

Senior Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
3,037
hes dead anyway lookwise. not a difference. the moment a girl see that crown balding hes 0
Back when he was still single I saw women online saying "I don't care if that bald spot gets 10x bigger he's still HOT" as the highest voted comments so no. It's mainly about the face.
 

WaccWaccWacc

Experienced Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
493
@WaccWaccWacc this:

View attachment 150404

Is not the same thing as this:

View attachment 150405

One just shaved his head, the other is actually bald.

Shaving your head does not put an end to balding.
Quit tagging me. I told you there is nothing further to discuss, its just a difference of opinions.

I bet you felt so good posting those two pictures lmao. “Aha heres proof”... lol. One of matt damon (actor) who had significant amount of muscle and somewhat intact hairline. The other of some scrawny nerdy guy with a scruffy finish and holding up the peace sign. I can only imagine what you googled lmfao.

For comedy sake, heres my spin to it... SeE bRo the guy with the clean wet shave looks way better than the guy with the intact hairline shave. Seriously quit responding, there’s nothing further to discuss.
 

Attachments

  • DC0EA861-5EC5-4C3A-9CE5-769811FD2EEB.png
    DC0EA861-5EC5-4C3A-9CE5-769811FD2EEB.png
    402 KB · Views: 134
  • F9DB40D0-3F18-4A95-85D9-187725C3FB7F.png
    F9DB40D0-3F18-4A95-85D9-187725C3FB7F.png
    378.4 KB · Views: 119

justinbieberscombover

Senior Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
3,037
So was I. Look at the two photos I posted, whose head looks better? Lol.

In the pics you posted you can see the difference in hair too. Shaving when you're bald isn't the same thing as shaving when you have hair. That's why looks will still deteriorate

I googled "bald guy" lol
 

WaccWaccWacc

Experienced Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
493
In the pics you posted you can see the difference in hair too. Shaving when you're bald isn't the same thing as shaving when you have hair. That's why looks will still deteriorate

I googled "bald guy" lol
Whatever, this is going nowhere and didn’t start anywhere either. I don’t even know what we’re arguing for anymore either, lol. SMP (feasible, cheap, available) could solve the inconsistencies that you are describing. However, I still think some will look better fully slick bald than others with a “hairline” bald based on other characteristics.
 

justinbieberscombover

Senior Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
3,037
Whatever, this is going nowhere and didn’t start anywhere either. I don’t even know what we’re arguing for anymore either, lol. SMP (feasible, cheap, available) could solve the inconsistencies that you are describing. However, I still think some will look better fully slick bald than others with a “hairline” bald based on other characteristics.
You entered the thread all emotional looking for arguments to begin with.

Anyway if SMP worked so well it would become a societal standard and literally every bald guy would get it. The only time someone looks better slick bald is when their hairline is crap. A good natural looking NW1 or 2 hairline is always better than no hairline.

And 3D hair with a good texture is always better than buzzed. The only time buzzed looks better is when the texture is trash.

To sum it up:

Symmetrical NW1-2 hairline > no hairline > advanced norwood

3D texture > buzzed > advanced thinning with hair grown out

It's simple
 
Last edited:

WaccWaccWacc

Experienced Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
493
You entered the thread all emotional looking for arguments to begin with.

Anyway if SMP worked so well it would become a societal standard and literally every bald guy would get it. The only time someone looks better slick bald is when their hairline is crap. A good natural looking NW1 or 2 hairline is always better than no hairline.

And 3D hair with a good texture is always better than buzzed. The only time buzzed looks better is when the texture is trash.

To sum it up:

Symmetrical NW1-2 hairline > no hairline > advanced norwood

3D texture > buzzed > advanced thinning with hair grown out

It's simple
You created a thread titled “Post Malone shaved his head because he was tired of balding and thinning”... I came into this thread annoyed because it’s so goddamn pointless. Nobody got anything out of this thread besides headaches.

Your whole spiel is subjective, your opinions have been noted. We can move on.
 

justinbieberscombover

Senior Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
3,037
You created a thread titled “Post Malone shaved his head because he was tired of balding and thinning”... I came into this thread annoyed because it’s so goddamn pointless. Nobody got anything out of this thread besides headaches.

Your whole spiel is subjective, your opinions have been noted. We can move on.

This is a positive thread that shows that one of the biggest superstars in the world is dealing with similar issues to us.

Before you went on to throw a temper tantrum, you had to ask yourself, "does OP really care?" and the answer as you already know would be "oh HELL NO".

You came annoyed cuz you got some repressed issues and subconscious thoughts that you are denying and rejecting. Stop projecting and deal with them directly instead of putting blame onto some random anonymous usernames on a forum.
 

WaccWaccWacc

Experienced Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
493
This is a positive thread that shows that one of the biggest superstars in the world is dealing with similar issues to us.

Before you went on to throw a temper tantrum, you had to ask yourself, "does OP really care?" and the answer as you already know would be "oh HELL NO".

You came annoyed cuz you got some repressed issues and subconscious thoughts that you are denying and rejecting. Stop projecting and deal with them directly instead of putting blame onto some random anonymous usernames on a forum.
Omg stop speaking like everything you say is objective. Its just not... its all subjective. Quite frankly you’re a moron too.

You don’t know what thoughts I have or issues lmao. What am I projecting? You’re coming off as someone who believes they know everything but quite frankly you don’t. You’re just getting overwhelmingly annoying now. Ive told you to drop it like 8x and you continue to attack me with a bunch of nonsense that you have already planned out in the small brain of yours. I’m going to do myself a favor and end it here by ignoring you.

Instead of typing up another response or obessing over celebrities going through the same sh*t as you... read thru this link. Should help you more long term than the security of knowing another celebrity is balding. Fkn weirdo, lmao.

 
Top