Rate My Norwood, Fellas. It's Over For Me.

couldntthinkofaname

couldntthinkofaname

Established Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
223
justinbieberscombover said:
There's a big diff between NW2 and 3.
Click to expand...
312312321ddd-png.png




k6fsn1512013176.jpg
 
S

ScaredOfBalding

Senior Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
709
couldntthinkofaname said:
only read the first page but why are guys pissed and claim this is not balding?

im at the same spot as op and even "normies" consider a hairline like this with receeded corner as "balding"


a norwood 1 hairline looks way better compared to norwood 2/3 especially if you have a natural high forehead (which op doesnt have but still)
Click to expand...
Norwood 2 is still fine imo m8. Most guys recede to about nw2 from teens to late twenties. Women won't think ur balding as long as ur hair is thick. Imo some people look better with nw2, gives off a more badass look. But for people with high foreheads it sucks indeed.
 
couldntthinkofaname

couldntthinkofaname

Established Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
223
ScaredOfBalding said:
Norwood 2 is still fine imo m8. Most guys recede to about nw2 from teens to late twenties. Women won't think ur balding as long as ur hair is thick. Imo some people look better with nw2, gives off a more badass look. But for people with high foreheads it sucks indeed.
Click to expand...


i think norwood 2 looks only better if you have very small and disproportional forehead...but i dont think its common..eg ronald reagan has a small forehead but would have really looked better with a norwood 2? i think it wouldnt have harmed him much lookswise but it wouldnt have been a real improvement either

but i agree norwood 2 is not the end of the world especially if you are 30+, however its clearly considering balding and its a good point to start treatment
 
S

ScaredOfBalding

Senior Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
709
couldntthinkofaname said:
i think norwood 2 looks only better if you have very small and disproportional forehead...but i dont think its common..eg ronald reagan has a small forehead but would have really looked better with a norwood 2? i think it wouldnt have harmed him much lookswise but it wouldnt have been a real improvement either

but i agree norwood 2 is not the end of the world especially if you are 30+, however its clearly considering balding and its a good point to start treatment
Click to expand...
Unless ur a high tier male model it won't make a lot of difference. And most people will not consider that balding since there are tons of examples where guys keep their nw2 for 20-30 years. I have 2 uncles who are norwood 3 for like 20 years already and will probably die nw3 because my grandfather had nw3 when he died. Before i had hairloss myself I never even noticed that they were nw3 or balding. And when i look around in uni most guys are beyond nw1. Nw1 is called juvenile hairline for a reason.
 
S

ScaredOfBalding

Senior Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
709
couldntthinkofaname said:
i think norwood 2 looks only better if you have very small and disproportional forehead...but i dont think its common..eg ronald reagan has a small forehead but would have really looked better with a norwood 2? i think it wouldnt have harmed him much lookswise but it wouldnt have been a real improvement either

but i agree norwood 2 is not the end of the world especially if you are 30+, however its clearly considering balding and its a good point to start treatment
Click to expand...
I do agree however it is the best place to start treatment but only if u notice ur going beyond nw2 and or have a family history of balding.
 
justinbieberscombover

justinbieberscombover

Senior Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
3,037
couldntthinkofaname said:
i think norwood 2 looks only better if you have very small and disproportional forehead...but i dont think its common..eg ronald reagan has a small forehead but would have really looked better with a norwood 2? i think it wouldnt have harmed him much lookswise but it wouldnt have been a real improvement either

but i agree norwood 2 is not the end of the world especially if you are 30+, however its clearly considering balding and its a good point to start treatment
Click to expand...
Come on, someone like Jon Hamm is infinitely more attractive than f*****g Ronald Reagan. Stop obsessing over bullshit. The difference between NW2 and NW1 isn't that critical. At that point it's more about the rest of your features, proportions and harmony.
 
Last edited:
couldntthinkofaname

couldntthinkofaname

Established Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
223
justinbieberscombover said:
Come on, someone like Jon Hamm is infinitely more attractive than f*****g Ronald Reagan. Stop obsessing over bullshit. The difference between NW2 and NW1 isn't that critical. At that point it's more about the rest of your features, proportions and harmony.
Click to expand...

yes jon hamm looks better and you are right about the face and proportions..but the comparison between reagan and hamm makes no sense

dont compare norwood 2 jon hamm to reagan

compare jon hamm norwood 2 to jon hamm norwood 1...

check out this thread i made

https://www.hairlosstalk.com/intera...-hairline-looks-weird-on-an-older-man.119702/


norwood 2 is not a biggie, but still .. norwood 1 just looks better..its a fact of life
 
justinbieberscombover

justinbieberscombover

Senior Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
3,037
couldntthinkofaname said:
yes jon hamm looks better and you are right about the face and proportions..but the comparison between reagan and hamm makes no sense

dont compare norwood 2 jon hamm to reagan

compare jon hamm norwood 2 to jon hamm norwood 1...

check out this thread i made

https://www.hairlosstalk.com/intera...-hairline-looks-weird-on-an-older-man.119702/


norwood 2 is not a biggie, but still .. norwood 1 just looks better..its a fact of life
Click to expand...
I don't see what you're trying to prove with that thread. Lol. You just seem to have that NW1 obsession in your head, it's okay, we all have our quirks.
 
I

infinitepain

Experienced Member
Reaction score
357
genetically_cursed said:
whats ur situation like rn? r u on finasteride?
Click to expand...

Im on finasteride and min, a topical formulation, however it is not enough. At least in france there are some clinics starting dutasteride treatments which are injected directly on the scalp, and im going to try that before I decide to go full cuck mode with oral dutasteride and nuke my DHT systemicatically.
 
B

BalderBaldyBald

Experienced Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
1,132
infinitepain said:
Im on finasteride and min, a topical formulation, however it is not enough. At least in france there are some clinics starting dutasteride treatments which are injected directly on the scalp, and im going to try that before I decide to go full cuck mode with oral dutasteride and nuke my DHT systemicatically.
Click to expand...

In Paris i assume ?
 
genetically_cursed

genetically_cursed

Experienced Member
My Regimen
Reaction score
383
infinitepain said:
Im on finasteride and min, a topical formulation, however it is not enough. At least in france there are some clinics starting dutasteride treatments which are injected directly on the scalp, and im going to try that before I decide to go full cuck mode with oral dutasteride and nuke my DHT systemicatically.
Click to expand...
so u dont take oral finasteride either? still shedding? got any pics of progress?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2023 XenForo Ltd.
Top