The fact SM04554 is a failure doesn't prove SM04554 is a failure.I knew some of you guys would find a way to cope with this. Kudos to them for finding another grift so quickly. Maybe they'll bring us an mRNA prlr cure
No cope here, I thought the top-line data would have been out a month or two ago. Longer it went the more it was obvious. This move basically seals the deal.I knew some of you guys would find a way to cope with this. Kudos to them for finding another grift so quickly. Maybe they'll bring us an mRNA prlr cure
And not even mention it in their statement about the pipeline in the press release?Positive scenario: They deliberately waited to publish the study until the name change was through. Because the study results are so intoxicatingly good that they want to draw attention to themselves with the new name.
True. They were supposed to have cured all the diseases they targeted.It is also very noticeable that half of the pipeline has been abandoned. At that time it was already clear to me that they weren't confident.
Probably because it wont offer maintenance without sides. I've long said the same thing. If you give people another treatment option that's above baseline 1+ year up, people will still use it when the alternatives are so sparingly thin. If this drug offered 10-20% increase in density at 1 year it would have been a success imo, but it looks like it missed even that target.As someone who doesn’t know how SM0554 actually works, can somebody explain to me how could a product like this not be profitable to them if, even though the regrowth wasn’t the greatest, seemed like it offered at least maintenance without sides? I mean, wouldn’t that be great in conjunction with a hair transplant?
Nice find. They've gotten all they can from private equity, now they can bilk retail rubes with an ipo. I admire their grift.
Yeah, I agree there. It might not be a total dud but it's not impressive, that's for sure.Yeah they have nothing. They wouldn't communicate it this way if it looked promising. They didn't mention it in the press release, they stear away in this article. I wouldn't keep my hopes up. But at least they tried which is nice enough.
Yeah but don't get excited, it's basically a footnote in their press release. If it was overwhelmingly positive it would have been the first thing mentioned.i'm so f*****g tired and so close to rope .... sorry to ask i'm extremelly low iq but does that mean they're finally releasing sm results in the next 6 weeks?
Don't sweat it, we always knew SM was nothing. We are getting SMI this week and next week, and some people started testing KY already. These are the big guns that could get you norwoods without side effectsi'm so f*****g tired and so close to rope .... sorry to ask i'm extremelly low iq but does that mean they're finally releasing sm results in the next 6 weeks?
How long have some people been using KY? Anything reported early?Don't sweat it, we always knew SM was nothing. We are getting SMI this week and next and some people started testing KY already. These are the big guns that could get you norwoods without side effects
thank for your answer i really whish as i'm entering nw4 territory and minoxidil isn't working as great as i expectedDon't sweat it, we always knew SM was nothing. We are getting SMI this week and next and some people started testing KY already. These are the big guns that could get you norwoods without side effects