Sex and Hairloss; Honestly Please!

[stnl]

To get women not masturbate in front of a computer all day JayMan

ahahahahahaha

nocturnal emissions are healthy and its a way your body regulates things. But remember it only happens once in 2 weeks even 3 weeks or 4 weeks . so its a lot better than masturbating 28 times / week

anyway for some people masturbation doesnt to shyte while for others it causes hormonal imbalances.

 

[docj077]

To get women not masturbate in front of a computer all day JayMan

ahahahahahaha

nocturnal emissions are healthy and its a way your body regulates things. But remember it only happens once in 2 weeks even 3 weeks or 4 weeks . so its a lot better than masturbating 28 times / week

anyway for some people masturbation doesnt to shyte while for others it causes hormonal imbalances.

Imbalanced? What do you mean by that statement? Testosterone levels should never go too high even with masturbation. There are negative feedback mechanisms in place to guarantee that they never go too high as levels outside of the physiological norm feedback at the level of the HPA to eventually prevent testosterone production. You keep saying that there is a hormonal imbalance, but I say that the levels are still within the physiological norm. Do you have proof that testosterone levels go above what doctors and scientists consider "normal" or do you just base your assumptions on some studies that say that the levels increase?

 

[stnl]

References:

 

[stampede]

For those who are serious about avoiding masturbation/sex, properly secure chastity devices and key-holder services are available on the 'net. They physically stop you getting an erection or playing with yourself but they do allow sufficient access for you to wash yourself while still flaccid.

I've considered using them but I think the sexual frustration would drive me insane. I think that investigating drugs to reduce libido (chemical castration) is probably a better way forward.

For the record, I've never got on with my sexuality, I hate having a sex drive, I hate the whole idea of sex and I would much rather be asexual. Any convincing proof that stopping sex/masturbation altogether will help in the male pattern baldness fight might just convince me to get serious about what I've thought about for a while...

 

[Wash n' Gone]

I find it a bit disturbing that so many people in this thread seem willing to give up acting on their sexual feelings for the sake of helping to slow down hairloss. It is just odd and seems to betray some underlying guilt about normal sexual desires. The fact it has no credibility is almost besides the point :?

 

[flimflam]

yeah, hairloss turns some weaker people into freaks.

castrate away, I say. I don't want your crybaby genetics poisoning the gene pool.

 

[stampede]

yeah, hairloss turns some weaker people into freaks.

castrate away, I say. I don't want your crybaby genetics poisoning the gene pool.

Show me a way of doing this without unacceptable side effects and I'll happily oblige.

The only way I've found in my research is to use depo povera combined with tamoxifen (some American states chemically castrate sex offenders in this way), but this is not something you can do yourself (you need a jab of the depo povera and I doubt my doctor will give it me on request!) and carries some nasty side effects.

I don't want to lose muscle (I am very active and enjoy weightlifting and swimming), I don't want to grow breasts, I'd like to keep my liver healthy, I don't fancy blood clots, and I'm happy with my voice the way it is too.

I wouldn't agree with your assessment that I'm weak. I've worked hard in life and have many achievements I'm proud of, I have a good job, good friends, a nice car, nice toys, an active lifestyle and a busy social life. I don't think that having ideas different to the norm regarding my sexuality makes me a "freak" either.

So why do you bate me? I've not tried to upset you in any way? :?

 

[docj077]

References:

When it comes to studies, here is what I accept and the conditions that must be met.

1.Government funded studies (funded by the NIH, for example.
2.Studies must be peer-reviewed.
3.Studies that take place in areas of the world that are properly funded and have physicians and researchers that are qualified for the job.
4.The study must demonstrate both external and internal validity.
5.The study must have an adequate experimental arm and an adequate control arm, so that variable analysis does not confuse the study.


So, since you posted your "references", I'll leave it up to you to make sure that all your studies meet all those criteria as they really are simplistic demands when it comes to biostatistics.


Enjoy.

 

[hawks05]

I've considered using them but I think the sexual frustration would drive me insane. I think that investigating drugs to reduce libido (chemical castration) is probably a better way forward


so.....PROPECIA?[/quote]

 

[hair today gone tomorrow]

I've considered using them but I think the sexual frustration would drive me insane. I think that investigating drugs to reduce libido (chemical castration) is probably a better way forward


so.....PROPECIA?

[/quote]

uhh...NO...ive been on propecia for almost a year and i still wake up hard every morning :wink:

Sucks it didnt work for you

 

[Captain_Charisma]

if protein is the key factor here - which is what they're implying - then your protein levels will be affected *significantly more* by your diet than by your daily teaspoon jettison of throat-yoghurt.

I suggest you eat more chicken and continue pleasuring yourself. Simultaneously, if necessary.

do I have to drink my protein shake before or after I choke the chicken?

 

[stnl]

References:

When it comes to studies, here is what I accept and the conditions that must be met.

1.Government funded studies (funded by the NIH, for example.
2.Studies must be peer-reviewed.
3.Studies that take place in areas of the world that are properly funded and have physicians and researchers that are qualified for the job.
4.The study must demonstrate both external and internal validity.
5.The study must have an adequate experimental arm and an adequate control arm, so that variable analysis does not confuse the study.


So, since you posted your "references", I'll leave it up to you to make sure that all your studies meet all those criteria as they really are simplistic demands when it comes to biostatistics.


Enjoy.

WELL U SHOW ME SOME WHICH SAY THE MASTURBATION = GOOD FOR HEALTH

 

[bubka]

is there some supernatural power that causes hairloss from masturbation then? seriously, because your body cannot tell the difference, you must believe in some type of masterbation fairies that go around and punish you with hairloss when you wank or something

 

[Captain_Charisma]

WELL U SHOW ME SOME WHICH SAY THE MASTURBATION = GOOD FOR HEALTH

Masturbation 'cuts cancer risk'

how about that?

 

[Pondle]

References:

When it comes to studies, here is what I accept and the conditions that must be met.

1.Government funded studies (funded by the NIH, for example.
2.Studies must be peer-reviewed.
3.Studies that take place in areas of the world that are properly funded and have physicians and researchers that are qualified for the job.
4.The study must demonstrate both external and internal validity.
5.The study must have an adequate experimental arm and an adequate control arm, so that variable analysis does not confuse the study.


So, since you posted your "references", I'll leave it up to you to make sure that all your studies meet all those criteria as they really are simplistic demands when it comes to biostatistics.


Enjoy.

WELL U SHOW ME SOME WHICH SAY THE MASTURBATION = GOOD FOR HEALTH

Stnl, I checked out some of those links on PubMed and before I got bored, given that I couldn't find the abstract for most of them, I couldn't see any links to actual physical harm caused by masturbation.

 

[stnl]

u couldnt even read the abstract and u decided that it doesnt cause harm ?

1) read those articles

2) look at the research studies those articles are based on

3) look at the references made in each article

4) get a brain.

 

[Pondle]

Stnl, have you read all of those studies? If so, kindly give me a synopsis as most of the articles don't have an abstract listed on PubMed. Many seem to deal purely with psychological issues e.g. masturbatory guilt as opposed to physical harm. You do know the difference, right?

I will "get a brain" if you stop being a prick. Have we got a deal? :lol:

 

[bubka]

stnl: do you believe there is a supernatural power out there that causes the body harm then because of the masturbation???


plus, i don't know where you found that image of your "research" that we need to get a brain, because i cannot even find ONE of those so called "research" articles, i think the picture is likely made up and a joke

seriously, where did you find it? and did you even read any of them, because i don't think you did, otherwise you could at least provide some actual links or content, other than a freaking image of so called existing articles

where did you get this??? :roll:

 

[Wash n' Gone]

I actually had a look at the one link that could be anything to do with hairloss (the rest are a bit besides the point). Here is the abstract:

http://www.springerlink.com/content/1elxf861chc5p9jv/

The guys who abstained had elevated T at the end of the study. Kind of puts a hole in the wanking makes you bald theory :freaked2:

 

[bubka]

oh i know, it's been obliterated so many times

i think sometimes people just come here to make such claims for attention whoring

or he actually believes that a supernatural being and or force causes hairloss because he masturbated