Sick Of Seeing Idiots Claiming Nw2s Don't Have A Right To Complain

[JohnsonDDG]

It's because you're vain! Don't worry though, you're joined by lots of people, myself included!

Pretty much - I've always wondered why some people don't care about looks.

Its such an important thing

 

[rclark]

Uncomfortable Man is still around. He just posts once in a while.

So, I take it your you're not going FOLLOW tellersquil? (I meant to say JohnsonDDG)?

 

[Haironn]

whew, haven't been in this forum for over a year, to the point that I lost my old account's info and had to make a new one
and it seems like everyone in here in still batshit crazy, fred seems less crazy, but still crazy

and y'all delusional as fck.
losing hair damages your chances in dating life ye, but you ain't gonna score 10/10 women if you're not 10/10 yourself, and having full hair doesn't make you 10/10 lmao
these type of girls reject sh*t ton of guys with full hair as well, if you're not super attractive then having hair or not having hair is not going to change that
but if you're attractive, facewise and bodywise, then you'll do good even without hair.

y'all acting as if the only reason you don't score top tier girls is because you're balding, lmao
gtfo with the bs

 

[biddybomb]

This guy looks like an uglier version of Brad Bellick from Prison Break. I don't see how anybody can find this guy sexy. I know confidence goes a long way, but come on.

you are clueless about women then. Women like beautiful and/or dangerous men. Some guys just resonate a particular vibe, ofc it usually comes with a big frame, skull and hands, but not always.

 

[Haironn]

you are clueless about women then. Women like beautiful and/or dangerous men. Some guys just resonate a particular vibe, ofc it usually comes with a big frame, skull and hands, but not always.

lol @ "dangerous men", are you 14 bro? I'm talking about women here, not 18 years old girls.
regardless it doesn't change what I said.
if you don't look good, then you won't look good with full hair as well, and having full hair won't get you to score 10/10 girls, for that you have to be just as attractive as they are, and hair wouldn't do that for you, that's body and most importantly face.

tbh from what I see in this forum 80% of the people here have much much deeper problems in life and they just blame it all on their loss of hair, thinking that if they had more hair they would become superman.
I bet my life that even if they had full head of hairs nothing would change in their lifes and they still wouldn't do sh*t with women.

 

[blackg]

lol @ "dangerous men", are you 14 bro? I'm talking about women here, not 18 years old girls.
regardless it doesn't change what I said.
if you don't look good, then you won't look good with full hair as well, and having full hair won't get you to score 10/10 girls, for that you have to be just as attractive as they are, and hair wouldn't do that for you, that's body and most importantly face.

tbh from what I see in this forum 80% of the people here have much much deeper problems in life and they just blame it all on their loss of hair, thinking that if they had more hair they would become superman.
I bet my life that even if they had full head of hairs nothing would change in their lifes and they still wouldn't do sh*t with women.

Noone on here has said that they would be pumping top tier women if they had a full head of hair.
That's a batshit lazy reading of the regular posters of this fine forum.
Most just want respect, from society and from the mirror, and a chance to find a partner, for either short term sex or something longer term.

Give it some thought.

 

[Haironn]

Noone on here has said that they would be pumping top tier women if they had a full head of hair.
That's a batshit lazy reading of the regular posters of this fine forum.
Most just want respect, from society and from the mirror, and a chance to find a partner, for either short term sex or something longer term.

Give it some thought.

the mirror doesn't judge you, you judge yourself. respect from society is not determined by how much hair you have on your head. people who want to disrespect someone will find all kinds of reasons to do so, it just happens that lack of hair is the first thing they use as such because it's most visible, but if it wasn't hair it would have been something else.

short term sex- in this time and era, if you're not above average looking your chances to have flings are very low to begin with. and hair doesn't make you above average from average or below. that's only face and body, in that department we are on the same boat with many men who have full hair of heads but are just average looking. hair will not change that much, I assure you.

on tinder there was a study that showed that the majority of women find only about 5-10% of the men that use tinder attractive, out of all of them.
only 5-10%!, so you're telling me all the rest are balding? hell no.

 

[blackg]

the mirror doesn't judge you, you judge yourself..

Largely based on what you see in the mirror and the feedback you get from your peers.

Who are you, anyway? (your old username)?

 

[Haironn]

Largely based on what you see in the mirror and the feedback you get from your peers.

Who are you, anyway? (your old username)?

old username was just "hairon"
Also, as I said, it doesn't matter what your peers say, if they wanted to make you feel bad they would use any method they have, if it was your hairloss it would be something else that would then make you feel bad as well.

 

[blackg]

old username was just "hairon"
Also, as I said, it doesn't matter what your peers say, if they wanted to make you feel bad they would use any method they have, if it was your hairloss it would be something else that would then make you feel bad as well.

You're speaking in cliche.

 

[JohnsonDDG]

the mirror doesn't judge you, you judge yourself. respect from society is not determined by how much hair you have on your head. people who want to disrespect someone will find all kinds of reasons to do so, it just happens that lack of hair is the first thing they use as such because it's most visible, but if it wasn't hair it would have been something else.

short term sex- in this time and era, if you're not above average looking your chances to have flings are very low to begin with. and hair doesn't make you above average from average or below. that's only face and body, in that department we are on the same boat with many men who have full hair of heads but are just average looking. hair will not change that much, I assure you.

on tinder there was a study that showed that the majority of women find only about 5-10% of the men that use tinder attractive, out of all of them.
only 5-10%!, so you're telling me all the rest are balding? hell no.

Decent post and welcome!

 

[rclark]

I miss ID Walker.

So do I. Sometimes i think someone banned him. Not going to say who... But it's strange he never posts here.

 

[Notcoolanymore]

Most just want respect, from society

 

[Notcoolanymore]

I miss ID Walker.

Dude's writing was like fine wine.

 

[Rudiger]

old username was just "hairon"
Also, as I said, it doesn't matter what your peers say, if they wanted to make you feel bad they would use any method they have, if it was your hairloss it would be something else that would then make you feel bad as well.

You sound like jd

 

[kj6723]

Holy f***! You're tellersquill?

Is this the biggest plot twist in HairLossTalk.com history?

 

[Rudiger]

I've already mentioned this on the forum, but this is so funny to read hairblues' old posts lecturing us about why human potato Harvey Weinstein is a womanizer.



Boy did he make a mark on the world.

Indeed you have mentioned this before, and I can't deny it looks silly now, I think I even made allusions to Weinstein's "charm" and I'll admit that, but I wasn't aware his wife wasn't actually self-made, clearly HB was also unaware in making her argument.

However of all people to dig up the dirty laundry, should we turn our attention to you in the interest of fairness? Anything that now would look silly or contradictory.

Because we'd need more than a post, we'd need a new sub-forum.

 

[Roberto_72]

Boy did he make a mark on the world.

I think the times were ripe for such a scandal to unravel. Harvey Weinstein, in the eyes of his victims (we shall see what the courts say), had been a sexual predator for years. Before 2017, the times were not ready for him to be reported, is all.

What is ironic is that I have been ***-raped (pardon my French) by women for all of my life and now I receive an email from HR saying sexual harassment will be tolerated less than ever. The icing on the cake. FML.

Thank you Harvey, from all the losers of the world. You managed to make our life even more difficult.

 

[Dante92]

I think the times were ripe for such a scandal to unravel. Harvey Weinstein, in the eyes of his victims (we shall see what the courts say), had been a sexual predator for years. Before 2017, the times were not ready for him to be reported, is all.

What is ironic is that I have been ***-raped (pardon my French) by women for all of my life and now I receive an email from HR saying sexual harassment will be tolerated less than ever. The icing on the cake. FML.

Thank you Harvey, from all the losers of the world. You managed to make our life even more difficult.

My thoughts exactly. Now we shall tread even more lightly, even a false accusation on a social media could cost a man his job, a false report to HR could permanently destroy your career even without a shred of evidence. It's absolute madness. Being male in 2018 is going to be so much fun!

Yeah, I know, changing your mind shouldn't be allowed.

This is true, and I would like to take this chance to apologize to you. You were right about some things.

 

[Dante92]

I really hope that my company will never partake in that kind of nonsense.

I saw a post on Linkedin where HR employees were discussing it, and one of the comment was "will you organize a seminar?"

Here's the kind of thing that would make me think about quitting my job: mandatory sexual harassment training.

To me, this would read like "Hey we don't think you're educated, smart and polite enough to figure out how to not harass women, so we're going to tell you how we think you should behave."

This is terrifying and I hope that if such measures are ever enforced in my immediate environment, enough people will stand against it.

Precisely. I would never, ever do anything as disgusting and filthy as harassing someone (I would not even argue with anyone, and surely would never violate someone's personal space in any way, people know I never would and are often surprised by my incredible politeness and good manners), because I'm a civilized, moral, well-educated person. Yet if someone wants to ruin my life without evidence for money, attention or for the heck of it, they can. How can we defend ourselves or live without feeling slightly paranoid? It's like living in a oppressive regime, knowing a neighbour could report you to the secret police.