I'm approaching 40.................. my hairs not changed much at all in the last 10 years party by controlling DHT rather than suppressing it.
If you have managed to reach 40 like you say and have been able get similar results to
@Niki99, myself or many other users and have maintained what for all intents and purpose is a full head of hair for the last 10 years, then that is an commendable achievement
My bewilderment is mainly directed at the hypocrisy that is sometimes seen online, where heavily balding critics seem to want to dissuade or lecture people on the error of their ways, so this post isn't directed at guys like you, who have had your kind of success.
Maybe you can do a full write up in the success story section?, as in almost quarter of a century of reading these kind's of forums, I'm finding alternative non surgical side effect free method's that can genuinely replicate these kind of results long term, few and far between.
Going back to the Fue discussion, Fue has made enormous progress over the last couple of decades, and is a real game changer for many, for guys like
@Wolf Pack , the combination of stabilization through finasteride and hairline reconstruction with Fue is one of the most powerful tools there is to manage the condition.
But the idea that Fue by itself is the best option
(''doing multiple FUE transplants is the best course of action'') and that guys who start balding to a NW3 in their teens and early 20's will simply be able to transplant their way out of trouble without any pitfalls or consequences, is just as dangerous of a suggestion as taking 5-Ari's themselves.