I just learned that this theory was debunked and called a scam a century ago.
Seems like we have come full circle to ignorance about hairloss with scam artists pushing this bludflow theory again
I will on PMCan you explain smooth vs rigid galea to me?
I have said that according to this theory people with poor craniofacial development can still have their hair. But people with good craniofacial development can't be balding. Also not everyone of these people fits the criteria of poor craniofacial development. Some of these guys have decent face shapes.Very interesting, how long will you deny the obvious?
Full head (poor galea and craniofacial development):
View attachment 181685View attachment 181686View attachment 181687View attachment 181688View attachment 181689View attachment 181690View attachment 181691View attachment 181692View attachment 181693View attachment 181694View attachment 181695View attachment 181696View attachment 181697View attachment 181698
In the 2nd photo the guy is going bald. Also doubts about the 5th and 7th photos, it is likely that they also began to retreat. Keep in mind that the shadows are darkened in the photo, this creates the impression of density.@Ritchie No matter what I post people will never admit that they belive but I found a profile on instragram about men cutting their hair and there are pics of non balding taken from the same angle. Here are the first ten that don't make any facial expression. To me it's quite clear that their face shapes doesn't look the same as the face shapes of balding men.
View attachment 181900
View attachment 181901
View attachment 181902
View attachment 181903
View attachment 181904
View attachment 181905
View attachment 181906
Do you base all your medical theory's on century old studies or just hair related stuff?Debunked a century ago