- Reaction score
- 614
So this is still limited to the number of hair foliicles that can be planted by square cm?
Logic dictates they should be able to do a higher density than a normal transplant, the hair follicle germs are much smaller than a grafts, so the incisions are smaller and there'd be less tissue damage overall allowing them to be placed closer together.
My question would be what proportion of the grafts would actually develop into full hair follicles and how many sessions would be required to achieve native density?