virtuality
Established Member
- Reaction score
- 2
Re: We killed Bin Laden! f*ck your Jihad! Hoorah Seals!!!!!!!!!!
If one looks hard enough for evidence, he/she will find it.. Eg, if we look for codes or patterns in religious texts, we'll find them. But, that doesn't mean the code or the patterns were put in there for a reason, they are there because we looked for something specific.
What I mean is, if we speculate long enough about 911, we'll find lots of irregularities and we'll make up a conspiracy theory.
I've been reading about The Big Bang. There are lots of gaps in that theory, some of those gaps have been filled in with some add-on theories. In the early days of the Big Bang theory, the physicists realized that explosions are not homogeneous, but all the cosmic waste of the big bang indicates a uniform expansion, ie The Inflation Theory.
My point is, in case of an explosion, in order to predict, or in the case of 911 simulate, the outcome of an explosion, we can define certain parameters that would tell us what an explosion looks like, but those results would have a degree of confidence that is not 100%. As in The Big Bang theory, explosions are not homogeneous and carry a degree of randomness that would lead to irregularities, which might be mistaken for a conspiracy.
cassin said:Viens said:Some interesting & strange facts surrounding 9/11:
There is some serious lack of evidence supporting any of those claims.
If one looks hard enough for evidence, he/she will find it.. Eg, if we look for codes or patterns in religious texts, we'll find them. But, that doesn't mean the code or the patterns were put in there for a reason, they are there because we looked for something specific.
What I mean is, if we speculate long enough about 911, we'll find lots of irregularities and we'll make up a conspiracy theory.
I've been reading about The Big Bang. There are lots of gaps in that theory, some of those gaps have been filled in with some add-on theories. In the early days of the Big Bang theory, the physicists realized that explosions are not homogeneous, but all the cosmic waste of the big bang indicates a uniform expansion, ie The Inflation Theory.
My point is, in case of an explosion, in order to predict, or in the case of 911 simulate, the outcome of an explosion, we can define certain parameters that would tell us what an explosion looks like, but those results would have a degree of confidence that is not 100%. As in The Big Bang theory, explosions are not homogeneous and carry a degree of randomness that would lead to irregularities, which might be mistaken for a conspiracy.