- Reaction score
- 5,714
Very eloquently written. I wish I was better at expressing my thoughts, the OP isn't as well written as this and I even borrowed alot of material. You need to be eloquent in order to have opinions in matters that aren't PC, because it's so easy to try to shut down. As evidenced in @macaroni 's post. It's usually either the personal attacks such as racist, virgin etc. or it's the lovely words like multiculturalism, compassion etc.Women do tend to vote for bigger government (therefore, left-leaning), as the government act as their "fall back" husband for welfare and law-making that favours women (based on the notion they are discriminated against). The shift in the government taking the role of the surrogate husband in terms of providing resources has made a lot of men redundant who are "there or thereabouts" in terms of earning capability. Governments have always hated the family structure, which is a competing power to themselves. This is not unique to the west. Look at China and Russia as further examples.
To exacerbate the problem for men...the younger generations will struggle in future economies as they are burdened with boomer/Gen X debt that has piled up, along with automation that makes many jobs redundant. The idea that the government can in any sustainable way act as a surrogate husband is folly. It cannot be financially supported, and the idea that a family doesn't need a father is corrosive to society.
And yet, men are told to act in a neutered way - virtue signal, act weak and mealy-mouthed. It's anathema to what women find attractive. As Patrick points out, women really do NOT like the metrosexual, "right on" types. They abhor them. (Some posters here might want to take note of that). Women will say one thing, do another. When you get an "attaboy" from a woman for your virtue signals, you fall into the beta category by default. Compare such sychophantic behaviour to the alpha that walks in the room and does what he wants. The beta looks pathetic in comparison. The beta is simply used to shore up female ego on an "as and when basis". The "right on" male shows he is unassertive, inconfident and weak. Socially, being "right on" is akin to being a nullo, a eunuch. They have - by their own decision - completely emasculated themselves.
It's alot more difficult to explain the evidence of a society being destroyed from the inside in the hands of niceism.
Jordan Peterson is definitely onto it, but I don't think he is familiar witht J.D Unwin's work.
A student of Peterson found out that the will that leftists have to defend migrants is in fact akin to misplaced maternal instinct.
I thought about that for a while and then the other, there was a show on volunteers who are giving food to the migrants, and one of the female volunteers said:
"I just have to help those people... I like to think of them as my children! That's right, they're my children!"
And what happens when you stand between a mother and her children?
"You racist bigot monster! Die! You have no heart! Nazi! Did you see that dead migrant kid on the beach! Shame on you!"
This explains a lot. Women are rising to positions of power and this is a first in the history of humanity.
And we can already see the consequences of that, not only that, but we also have to deal with their cuck white-knight enablers.
A lot of women want to defend the migrants (their children!) and a lot of white knights want to defend to women who defend the migrants.
Fortunately as you say, there are plenty of women who are conservative and willing to stand up for their culture.
He said: "... That's the compassion issues like you can't just transform that into a political stance and I think part of what we're seeing is actually the rise of a form of female totalitarianism we have no idea what would be like if women ran it because that's never happened before in the history of the planet. We introduced women into the poltical sphere radically over the last 50 years we have no idea what the consequences of that is going to be."
We do have an idea what will happen with feminist society where women are emancipated. Multiple of studies on this subject have all reached the same conclusion: as women become more emancipated the society will rot.
A feminist society is an oxymoron, it's just not sustainable in the long run, and history proves this.
We can already see the that the West that used to dominate all other cultures is now dying, Islam on the other hand is the culture conquering the West because they keep their women chaste.
A beautiful white girl. Won't be any of those left once the leftist totalitarians reach their goal which may not be in the so distant future. Their goal is "multiculturalism", what is the end game of multiculturalism? The exact opposite, everywhere you go in the West their original traditions, cultures and values will have dissappeared to make room the "New Europeans" traditions, cultures and values. The white women will breed with the brown and ultimately the white race, culture, traditions and values will dissappear.and now for a palate cleanser
lovely Allison Brie:
View attachment 62406
View attachment 62407
View attachment 62408
View attachment 62409
View attachment 62410
View attachment 62412
"I can't wait to become a minority in this land." Said no person in history, ever. With the exception of self hating white cucks and women who have been fooled into believing that replacing their own people with foreigners is a moral obligation because of slavery and conquest. Too bad all races have been guilty of slavery and fighting for territory. The only difference is that white people did it the best.