- Reaction score
- 480
Transplanted hair from your horseshoe do just as well on the top of your head than on the sides, so no.
Until there is a long term study on patient outcomes I don’t think we can reasonably make this assumption.
Transplanted hair from your horseshoe do just as well on the top of your head than on the sides, so no.
OP's theory states that those transplanted hairs stay "immune" because of epigenetics.
Until there is a long term study on patient outcomes I don’t think we can reasonably make this assumption.
But we can assume his head canon theory is right, based on unproven setpieces?
Of course we can't. The GA transmited scalp tension hypothesis presents the most credible explanation as to why male pattern baldness progresses in the pattern it does, I think it is pitiful that researchers haven't more thoroughly investigated this link.
In support of the blood flow theory of Androgenetic Alopecia, hair transplantation works because the hairs transplanted go deeper into the scalp where they can reach blood flow much better than the shallower, original hairs that miniaturize.
It's an interesting idea, if anyone has good proof for or against this idea please provide.
Interesting and sobering. Do you mind sharing these case studies?No proof and hairs taken from the non safe donor zone/ in people with dupa miniaturize when transplanted. I have seen case studies from hairtransplant doctors on that.
Also sorry, what's dupa? Is this a different situation than "regular" Androgenetic Alopecia?No proof and hairs taken from the non safe donor zone/ in people with dupa miniaturize when transplanted. I have seen case studies from hairtransplant doctors on that.
Interesting and sobering. Do you mind sharing these case studies?
I'd like to point out that hairtransplant doctors profit from the viability and current understanding of why hair transplants work. I wouldn't take all information about the nutrition of tomatoes from tomato farmers.
Also sorry, what's dupa? Is this a different situation than "regular" Androgenetic Alopecia?
Forgive my ignorance
THank you.I'd have to look them up, maybe tomorrow. The cases stand on their own though, hair transplanted from a zone that is affected by thinning later on will thin when transplanted to the top of your head as well.
Diffused unpatterned alopecia, basically your sides thin as well.
"The hypothesis argues that: (1) chronic scalptension transmitted from the galea aponeurotica induces an inflammatory response in androgenic alopecia-prone tissues"
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306987717310411
This is Rob from perfecthairhealth.com 's peer reviewed article that supports the galea theory
https://perfecthairhealth.com/update-2018-published-research-paper/
*I do not currently have outspoken support for this theory*
From my viewpoint at the moment it's scar tissue (fibrosis) and calcium deposition in the scalp environment that may be causing the stiffness that so many people claim is the galeaI feel a bit naive now, always thought this article was really inciteful at the time but had I known what I know now that the author of this hypothesis isn't even in academia, was his first article, and was accepted in a journal with what seems to have no standards or peer reviewing protocols in place, I feel I wouldn't have given as much credence to the claims.
That's a different environment. They've had successful transplants of body hair being transplanted in the scalpReminder that hairs taken from balding areas of the scalp and transplanted onto the forearm still miniaturize as if they were on the scalp.
This whole galea theory is really old and debunked. The follicles are fundamentally, genetically fucked.
We have something in belgium called galeaatonomie in the welnessclinic they loosen the galea so there is no more hairloss some people already did it and say its a scam because it doesnt halt it for sh*t it already exist for more the 10 years