Sorry but bull****. For example 2 guys in our forum are taking Seti for some month now. They stopped dutasteride and finasteride when they startd Seti and hairloss is still stopped with Seti. I think oral Seti does not work. But we have some success storys with Seti as topical.
Jup, I was aware of that. Someone already mentioned it. That says completely nothing though. First of all who are these 2 persons? What do you actually know of their background? Can they actually make a objective evaluation of their hair status? Perhaps they have OCD(like many do on these forums) and have a perfect NW1 and never had aggressive hair loss to start with? It’s possible, no?
Secondly what the hell do 2 success reports matter when many more people are using the stuff. Give 100 people a theradome and some of them will probably report too that it stopped their hair loss. Now actually imagine if setipiprant showed the same results as finasteride. Man, the forums would literally be filled with positive anecdotal reports about setipiprant by now. That would actually be strong anecdotal reporting, but this isn’t the case with setipiprant.
Back in 2012 there was a huge hype of another molecule with exactly the same mechanism. Go look it up there is a topic that has like 2 million views or something. There were actually more positive reports about that molecule than setipiprant currently has. Eventually though it never really got “mainstream”. So apparently it’s not that good overall huh? Even the anecdotal reporting was exactly the same btw “decreased itch” and less “shedding”.
I personally judge whether something is good or not by how effective it is “overall”. Clearly DP2 antagonists don’t match up to compounds that modulate androgen expression or the androgen receptor, it’s not even close. So if you think that finasteride isn’t miles ahead of DP2 antagonists then you are in for a big surprise. I’m obviously not 100% sure if it won’t get past phase 2 trials because I can’t look into the future but I would love and immediately bet my money on it that it won’t. We’ll see though, time will tell.
I'm not defending Seti as I have no skin in the game (other than going bald), but just because forum users that have to mix their own topicals aren't getting great results doesn't mean it/anything else being tested won't work in a clinical setting, where production and vehicles are consistent (and hopefully better than what posters are using). Do I think Seti will work? Probably not - but I'll wait for Kythera/Allergan to announce.
I understand. As long as you do understand that setipiprant has already run 7 or 8 clinical trials and many other DP2 antagonists have run clinical trials. So if you think for example that any DP2 antagonist will grow hair, think again. Obviously their clinical trial will be the most important. Don't get your hopes up too much that's all I can say.