- Reaction score
- 850
And it sure read like prophecy too.Wow. This is the most devastating comment in the entire thread.
Most sensible post at that time.
And it sure read like prophecy too.Wow. This is the most devastating comment in the entire thread.
I do not want to offend you but your speech is typical of the 90s. The fight between companies is "agressive". With those arguments you show that you have no idea about hair loss...Is incredible.and yet there are those people who dislike my posts who are convinced that this time it really is different and the cure is out very soon now.
One of them is basically bald, Norwood 6, so false hope is all he has left; it is really sad.
i think in a few years he will just accept being bald and will be on sly bald guys.
I do not want to offend you but your speech is typical of the 90s. The fight between companies is "agressive". With those arguments you show that you have no idea about hair loss...Is incredible.
Exhibit Four – Hair Loss Market Continues to Boom with More Growth to Come
http://globalsmallcaps.com/2017/05/25/replicel-life-sciences-inc-on-verge-of-biotech-breakthrough/
You are so naive ... The new treatments will give you many millions. And all the companies want their piece in the cake.
i've been sh*t on so many times by promises. all i want is a few good, clear, HD photos, showing clearly a Slick Norwood 7 before photo; and then identifiably the same person with a Norwood 2, hell even a Norwood 3 would be enough.
If these companies truly have a cure, this kind of thing should be no problem considering an iphone costs a few hundred dollars and can take ultra-HD photographs. Infact they can even take 2K videos, so why don't we have a video panning over a patients head?
Instead, all we see are blurry, low resolution photos taken in poor lighting, that show no regrowth; only longer hair.
Where are the regrowth photos? How come we don't see a single one?
I've read so many hundreds of paragraphs of glowing, flowery language it is all meaningless to me now.
Basically these companies know they don't have any sort of cure, that is why they put out these rubbish proofs. The glowing press releases are purely there to attract investment funding.
I don’t know much about the past of hair loss research.
Why did adreans ditch the study?
Get another hair transplant?You obviously had a better result then I did. Mine is thin and doesn't look natural.
Razz, you can always do your own research.If hair had been cloned/multiplied earlier, how is Tsuji different?
Afaik, there is reason to have faith in his research because he has grown Human Haur in Mice. Now what remains is the human trials.
Am I wrong? Somebody please enlighten me on this.
Razz, you can always do your own research.
Anywho...
Neither Aderans nor Intercytex succeeded in hair multiplication. They both failed at amplifying mesenchymal dp cells.
Their treatments were similar to RCH-01, not Tsuji.
Yeah basically after a number or cell splits the new grown stem cells will start to lose their inductive properties. so new grown cells are no longer dp cells and useless.
This issue has since been solved by Tsuji's team so much more mature hf primordium can be injected to create entire new follicles.
I highly doubt the cells Replicel amplified were stem cells.like @Hate da Bt said the treatment from them was more like rch-01 not tsuji. Does that mean replicell/shiseido overcome this problem as well? Because I never read about that and if they haven't that would mean in conclusion their product is doomed to faile what i really can't belive.
Any thoughts on that?
Old threats in the research section like these are pure black pill. The fact that some of these guys truly believed that they were gonna be saved by 2010 is just tragic. I also wonder what happened to these guys, most of them are probably depressed 40 year olds by now