Re: dutasteride result better than finasteride -Bryan made (slight) error
Did the small study use a 1 cm circle or square? I can check for myself, but so far two people saw it say circle, one of them cut it directly and pasted it, and Bryan says he read that it says square.
Even if the propecia trial used a circle, that is till 2.54^2 times the area of a 1 cm circle.
Did they do it on the vertex, or somewhere new this time?
Bryan said:Tau Fat said:A small dot tattoo was placed on the scalp at baseline to identify the center of a 1 cm2 circular target area on the anterior leading edge of the vertex hair loss region to be used for hair counts. (Cut straight from the full text).
Therefore the hair count compared to the square inch in the earlier Merck trial is 130.935 and a better result than Propecia by approximately 12%.
The Phase III Propecia trial didn't use a square inch test area. They used a 1-inch diameter circular test area, which is 5.1 square centimeters. The haircount results per square centimeter were slightly better in the Propecia trial than they were in this small dutasteride trial.
Bryan
Did the small study use a 1 cm circle or square? I can check for myself, but so far two people saw it say circle, one of them cut it directly and pasted it, and Bryan says he read that it says square.
Even if the propecia trial used a circle, that is till 2.54^2 times the area of a 1 cm circle.
Did they do it on the vertex, or somewhere new this time?