Do you not realize that those two sentences, which are directly following in your post, are mutually exclusive?
A wh*** is defined as a woman who exchanges money for sex she doesn't necessarily want.
That is totally different from "giving into lust", it's literally the opposite.
But I agree with you, this woman probably gave into lust, and there's nothing wrong that. She wants to live her life and enjoy herself, and is currently (or was until a few weeks ago) with a man beneath her station.
Note that I have no problem with either situation. I think that prostitution should be legal and regulated, and that people should give into lust sometimes.
obviously I didn't mean she's literally a wh***.
And you're wrong. it was obviously wrong of her to give in to her lust because she didn't plan on dumping her boyfriend or leave him, she cheated on him, or are you saying it's alright to cheat? okay then, that's your opinion. cheat and be cheated on as much as you'd like.
but giving in to lust, if you have a SO and want to still be with them, is obviously wrong, because you might enjoy your 30 min of lust, but you'll lose your SO in return (unless they are pathetic).
people should give in to lust if they are aware that they will lose their partner in return and are willing to take that chance. otherwise no, they shouldn't, and yes, it's wrong.
but hey, as I said, not many people actually have the decency to break up before going for others, because people don't like to stay alone, so first they cheat and get themselves someone else, and then they dump their current partner.
Yeah they weren't looks-matched.
I didn't realize that she also has a nice figure.
lol you're acting as if looks-matched people don't cheat on each other. even if they were looks-matched, you forget that after awhile routine hits the relationship like any relationship and makes things boring and rusty, so she might have met someone who was even x10 times better looking than herself. so even a looks-matched partner wouldn't prevent that.
Additional pictures were posting further demonstrating that she's much better looking.
She has a lot of good traits, skin, hair, lips, eyes, boobs, thin.
His only good trait is his frame, which is ruined by him being fat. His body mass index looks to be about 30, might be higher.
nah he's not BMI 30, not even close. I was BMI 30 in my past and it's hella fatter than the way he looks.
bottom line, it's not all about the hair, not saying his lack of hair didn't have something to do with it, but I'm pretty sure she didn't cheat cause of that. there were probably lots of reasons combined, she might have been drunk, or just met someone who was hella good looking and gave in to lust, maybe her relationship with her partner wasn't the best at the time.
also like medina said, girls don't like needy and clingy guys just like guys don't like those types of girls, maybe he was also acting like a b**ch, who knows.
you guys seem to forget something though, looks can also give you so much, looks is great for tinder and flings, but relationship is a different game.
I mean even if 2 people were 10/10 looks matched, they are not immune from cheating, or from the relationship becoming tiring/ boring / rusty.
no matter how good looking the person you date is, eventually you'll get tired of seeing the same naked body over and over again, and will naturally start looking else ware.
I could be eating the most appetizing delicious steak in the world every day, eventually I'm gonna want to have hamburger or pizza.
it works the same way, believe it or not, people are just not really, monogamous, especially during this era of the internet, dating apps, facebook and easy access to other people. the temptations are too strong and way easier to give in to at this day and time.
no one is safe from that, not even the best looking people.