Bald Guy Scores A Hottie... And He's Not Even Rich

[EvilLocks]

That post wasn't directed at you. It's just pointing out the iciocy in thinking that it being current year is an argument.

I can tell you why girls are sl*ts who sleep with alot of men are sl*ts while guys who sleep with alot of women are studs, though. Although I feel like I have explained it many times, and I'm perceived as some evil misogynist by many members here for explaining my views.

So, first of the reason guys who sleep with alot of women are studs is simply because it requires some amount of feat. Either extremely good looks, alot of money, or status. An average girl (could be below average too) on the other hand can log onto to Tinder and get pounded by a guy 10 minutes later with little effort. As discussed in earlier posts, the women are the choosers.

The reason I dislike sl*ts and white knights who let them be sl*ts with no consequences even more is simply because it is destroying western society. I also dislike the fact that the normal thing to say is: "it's 2017 let them do what they want they aren't hurting anybody!".
Yeah sure, except their fatherless children if they even have any. Statistics show that children from fatherless homes are more likely to be poor, become involved in drug and alcohol abuse, drop out of school, and suffer from health and emotional problems. Boys are more likely to become involved in crime, and girls are more likely to become pregnant as teens. And not having children is also hurting western society, birthrates of western women are plummeting while immigrants are flooding in and breeding like rabbits.

Once a former sl*t is 30 or so and is ready to settle down and got the sl*t life "out of her system" and finds herself a nice looksmatched beta provider this is no longer good enough for her. Because it's a massive downgrade from the life she was living in her 20s, the beta provider just isn't as good as Chad in every aspect. Who would have thought? And now she's a b**ch towards him and resents him for it, and they're both miserable. It's has been mentioned by the hairlosstalk slayer brigade that their ex girlfriends are still contacting them while dating beta providers, and would cheat with them if they could.

If they have kids, they aren't getting the support and love they need from their parents because the parents are miserable all the time. I think we can all agree that the children are important for a healthy growing society, and they are clearly getting hurt by this behaviour. So, is this slutty behaviour really not hurting anyone?

This makes my head hurt. You have a point, but remember you have to be two to tango. Can't put all the blame on the 'sl*t'
Most of the 'sl*ts' I know are using birth control anyway and not getting knocked up left and right.
It is possible to be a woman and practice safe sex with multiple partners in this time and age.
And, I'm not saying this because I am a so called 'sl*t' myself, actually far from it. People are actually surprised when they find out the real number of men I have been with sexually.
But I also have or have had friends with many, many partners. Most of the men they've been with have had many parters as well. But these girls are good people, with good morals, not getting knocked up (as of yet) etc.
And in my opinion this is what is most important.
Sure, it's easier to be sl*t than stud, but at the end of the day what people choose to do with their bodies as long as they practice safe sex, is up to them in my opinion.
If I had many partners it would not have meant I was less of a person. It's just not in my nature to do so, I have a real need of commitment to someone although I have had a one night stand before as well. Like I said, I'm not an angel either.

 

[EvilLocks]

I like it. Short and to the point.
Still, see above for my extended answer.

 

[hairblues]

Ahh, board troll again. I'm on to you my son. So in between technical support calls, do us both a favor, for me n you, n skip over my posts. We'll both be better off

I actually had trouble understanding what you wrote.

 

[hairblues]

This makes my head hurt. You have a point, but remember you have to be two to tango. Can't put all the blame on the 'sl*t'
Most of the 'sl*ts' I know are using birth control anyway and not getting knocked up left and right.
It is possible to be a woman and practice safe sex with multiple partners in this time and age.
And, I'm not saying this because I am a so called 'sl*t' myself, actually far from it. People are actually surprised when they find out the real number of men I have been with sexually.
But I also have or have had friends with many, many partners. Most of the men they've been with have had many parters as well. But these girls are good people, with good morals, not getting knocked up (as of yet) etc.
And in my opinion this is what is most important.
Sure, it's easier to be sl*t than stud, but at the end of the day what people choose to do with their bodies as long as they practice safe sex, is up to them in my opinion.
If I had many partners it would not have meant I was less of a person. It's just not in my nature to do so, I have a real need of commitment to someone although I have had a one night stand before as well. Like I said, I'm not an angel either.

I think it's because they would never think of the guy sexually where women they do.

And they all would like ideally to be the guy getting laid several times a week. Even if just for a little while. So the admiration.

Also WPB just said other day he does not want to be compared to other men in relationships.

And they resent if they maybe were one day to be considered as the beta cucks they described. Probably nightmare for them.

All reasonable but has nothing to do with morality of one gender over the other. They are just being guys.

 

[blackg]

The best argument by far is this analogy:

A key that can open many locks is called a master key, but a lock that can be opened by many keys is a shitty lock.

Getting laid is extremely hard for men, being successful with women is no joke, you actually need to work on yourself, hard, and to put yourself out there.

Another thing you seem to ignore is that women terrify men, all the time, all men always have that fear of rejection. They see women as mother nature condemning them to a death sentence when they're rejected.

"You are not good enough, your entire being isn't worthy of my time, my energy and my sexual favors, you are worthless!" That's our internal discourse when we're turned down.

It might seem funny to a woman but it's the truth. What matters to women is your position on the social hierarchy, which is determined by: your looks, your height, your body, your status, your potential, your personality, your intelligence, your sense of humor, your abilities, your social skills, etc., etc.

When a woman turns you down, your whole world crumbles, and you can spend days, weeks, months cogitating about what went wrong, about how you can be such a loser. Maybe it's my looks? Maybe it's my height? Maybe it's because I have shitty social skills?

Maybe I'm just a loser period and I don't deserve any woman's attention?

I'm not going to even talk about women who sleep with dozens of guys in this post, this way I can avoid the misogynist label.

With the above, you can already figure out why guys who transcend their weak male condition and become who have sex with dozens of women are regarded as heroes.

I gotta admit... This post had me!

 

[CaptainForehead]

@WhitePolarBear will enjoy this:

 

[blackg]

That post wasn't directed at you. It's just pointing out the iciocy in thinking that it being current year is an argument.

I can tell you why girls are sl*ts who sleep with alot of men are sl*ts while guys who sleep with alot of women are studs, though. Although I feel like I have explained it many times, and I'm perceived as some evil misogynist by many members here for explaining my views.

So, first of the reason guys who sleep with alot of women are studs is simply because it requires some amount of feat. Either extremely good looks, alot of money, or status. An average girl (could be below average too) on the other hand can log onto to Tinder and get pounded by a guy 10 minutes later with little effort. As discussed in earlier posts, the women are the choosers.

The reason I dislike sl*ts and white knights who let them be sl*ts with no consequences even more is simply because it is destroying western society. I also dislike the fact that the normal thing to say is: "it's 2017 let them do what they want they aren't hurting anybody!".
Yeah sure, except their fatherless children if they even have any. Statistics show that children from fatherless homes are more likely to be poor, become involved in drug and alcohol abuse, drop out of school, and suffer from health and emotional problems. Boys are more likely to become involved in crime, and girls are more likely to become pregnant as teens. And not having children is also hurting western society, birthrates of western women are plummeting while immigrants are flooding in and breeding like rabbits.

Once a former sl*t is 30 or so and is ready to settle down and got the sl*t life "out of her system" and finds herself a nice looksmatched beta provider this is no longer good enough for her. Because it's a massive downgrade from the life she was living in her 20s, the beta provider just isn't as good as Chad in every aspect. Who would have thought? And now she's a b**ch towards him and resents him for it, and they're both miserable. It's has been mentioned by the hairlosstalk slayer brigade that their ex girlfriends are still contacting them while dating beta providers, and would cheat with them if they could.

If they have kids, they aren't getting the support and love they need from their parents because the parents are miserable all the time. I think we can all agree that the children are important for a healthy growing society, and they are clearly getting hurt by this behaviour. So, is this slutty behaviour really not hurting anyone?

With every new social shift people like yourself have been saying "this means the end of Western civilization."
Be it unions fighting for fair work conditions, suffrage, the birth control pill and many other so-called threats to the West.

The West is sill standing strong. In fact, the Western World survives precisely because of these pluralities.

 

[Exodus2011]

In French, we say le 4 novembre.

In Dutch and German, we say 4 november.

In Spanish, it's 4 de noviembre.

We first mention the object and then the set, not the other way around.

The 4th of the month of november of the year 2017 of the 21st century, etc.

Muricah is retarded on that one.

Other than that, yeah, I love Muricah! And I believe they partly saved our asses during WWII.

take away the south and libtards and america's pretty rad

oh and heres some interesting neuroscience research for your previous post about rejection and status

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blo...s-more-accurate-way-understanding-self-esteem

"A feeling of being less than other people, activates the same brain regions as physical pain. Eisenberger's study showed five different physical-pain brain regions lighting up under this social-pain experiment. Social pain can be as painful as physical pain, as the two appear synonymous in the brain."

"Studies of primate communities show that higher status monkeys have reduced day-to-day cortisol levels, are healthier, and live longer. This isn't just monkey business (sorry for the pun.) There is an entire book, The Status Syndrome by Michael Marmot, illustrating that status is a significant determinant of human longevity, even controlling for educationand income. High status doesn't just feel good. It brings along very real rewards, too."

"Status is rewarding not just when you have achieved high status, but also anytime you feel like your status has increased, even in a small way. One study showed that saying to kids "good job" in a monotonous recorded voice activated the reward circuitry in kids as much as a financial windfall."

 

[Exodus2011]

saying the day prior to the month just sounds sloppy and wordy to me. Its all in how you are conditioned to hearing it, in the end it really doesnt matter and isnt that big of a deal, Im just being an ***.

correct its about condtioning but it IS more logical. saying the day first tells more information. since theres a lot more days than there are months and almost never would people actually want the month when asking haha

 

[Dench57]

day/month/year

logic motherfuckers

use it

 

[hairblues]

Sleeping around for a girl is all fun and games, but if later, you can never find a guy that's as good as the stud you once fell in love with, you're going to become one miserable b**ch and make life hell for your beta cuck boyfriend, your family, your friends, possibly everyone around you, and it won't be long before you push the self-destruct button and ruin the life of your beta cuck husband and your kids, and go on a 'Eat, Pray, Gag on c*m' road trip.

First of all I think you pretty much just proved what I wrote that this is your fear and hypocrisy..

And you think marrying a HIMBO is fantastic for women lol

Okay

 

[Dench57]

Fred you don't half talk some sh*t but "Thousand c*** stare" and "eat, pray, gag on c*m" are high quality

Chapeau!

 

[hairblues]

Resentment for not having what you had before, what you thought you deserved.

Hardly a groundbreaking analysis on human behavior.

Or are you one of these guys that believe that humans are naturally good and always want what's healthy, positive and rationally good for themselves and the rest of the world?

You really believe the world is a healthy, optimistic place where people try their best to act rationally?

Why not? Make your case. Or are you just going to shame me with an empty one-line post again?

Correct but same applies to both genders not just one

Didn't you speak casually of cheating on you future wife if her body changed after child birth?

 

[hairblues]

Amazing how he can't see his actual hypocrisy by liking one post but not the other lol

Male-bimbos are more likely to cheat and possibly leave after first few years which would make his home life and kids unhappy

He is also more likely to bring home an STD to his wife

So same sh*t.

Spread disease
Make spouse miserable with his f*****g around
Make children unhappy and fucked up adults by f*****g around and making his home life upset
He will resent his wife and family for not having his former glory days and having settled down when he could be f*****g around without restraint or expectations

Same sh*t different gender

 

[Exodus2011]

I bet promiscuous dad - faithful mom progeny are better off than vice versa. Like we've discussed men need things going for them to get laid a lot, women don't

And the kids will inherit this genetic "quality"

I actually know guys like this, they have problems but they're a lot better off than incels. Usually drunkard types who listen to butt rock sh*t like godsmack, seether and nickelback

They have masculinity unlike incels

 

[hairblues]

I bet promiscuous dad - faithful mom progeny are better off than vice versa. Like we've discussed men need things going for them to get laid a lot, women don't

And the kids will inherit this genetic "quality"

I actually know guys like this, they have problems but they're a lot better off than incels. Usually drunkard types who listen to butt rock sh*t like godsmack, seether and nickelback

They have masculinity unlike incels

Not really it will be more likely they get divorced and fight

 

[hairblues]

Hypothetical scenarios about the future, I actually have no idea of what I'm going to do when I'm older.

And it's only about sexual urges here. Women's mating choices are not as simple as getting release.

Women want the best they can have and if they had better before, they can tell, and the husband as well as her own well-being are going to suffer in consequence.

I don't think it is as strong for men but sure, you can imagine a situation where a guy fell in love and thinks he can never replace the girl he fell in love with.

These are the dangers of casual sex, if there is such a thing as we were led to believe.

Can sex actually be casual? I have my doubts since I remember feeling like crap after most of my one night stands and during my flings.

And that's not an uncommon feeling for men and women who engage in casual sex.

sl*ts and himbos it is just about sexual release that's what we are talking about

We moving goal post now?

 

[Exodus2011]

Not really it will be more likely they get divorced and fight

At least the kid won't be a socially anxious hypersensitive mess lol.

 

[hairblues]

At least the kid won't be a socially anxious hypersensitive mess lol.

If his mother and father are fighting constantly from his or her cheating?

Yes they will

 

[hairblues]

This kind of relationship can only work (as in be remotely healthy) if the wife submits to her husband and swallows her pride.

But of course she's going to suffer, no way around it.

In France, they have a famous couple that embodies that kind of archetypal relationship pretty well: Jacques Dutronc and Françoise Hardy.

View attachment 61139

Just look at the guy, you can understand what she just had to accept him sleeping around with tons of groupies.

She always remained deeply in love with him no matter how many women he slept with behind her back.

And thanks to him, she was allowed to transfer her sadness in some of the most beautiful songs the French have ever written.

Read first line only because tired

If you have to make conditions you just keep proving my point

marrying a HIMBO or a BIMBO is equally bad and the spouse has to make either concessions or be miserable