- Reaction score
- 5,624
Lol at the white trash types that are like this being anxiousIf his mother and father are fighting constantly from his or her cheating?
Yes they will
Lol at the white trash types that are like this being anxiousIf his mother and father are fighting constantly from his or her cheating?
Yes they will
No lol the genetic quality of himbos is a lot higher than bimbosRead first line only because tired
If you have to make conditions you just keep proving my point
marrying a HIMBO or a BIMBO is equally bad and the spouse has to make either concessions or be miserable
No lol the genetic quality of himbos is a lot higher than bimbos
Morally they're equal I agree but objectively promiscuous men are so different
Genetic quality is literally the most relevant thing possible lawlIrrelevant
when they start to f*** around and make a fool of you you are still upset and lash out start drinking taking pills having your own affairs as revenge
ALL bad for a marriage and kids
Genetic quality is literally the most relevant thing possible lawl
Genetic quality is literally the most relevant thing possible lawl
"I know you guys like to believe in science and sh*t, but I base my beliefs on sh*t people tell me! Way more reliable!"
It's like my cousin telling me:
"I believe what I see with my own eyes, not science, and I'm sorry, I've never seen the earth from space with my own eyes so I will continue to believe it's flat, that's what my Muslim friends told me!"
Genetic quality is what allows male sl*ts to be male sl*ts.
Women don't need genetic quality to be able to sleep around.
So I'm afraid it is relevant.
Reminds me of this study made by a hair piece company that show that bald men are 5 times less likely to get a response on online dating websites.
And people were like "well of course they'll tell you that, they're a hair piece company!"
Were they wrong though? Their study remains true whether you want to hear it or not and they were pretty smart to conduct it to advertise their rugs.
Reminds me of this study made by a hair piece company that show that bald men are 5 times less likely to get a response on online dating websites.
And people were like "well of course they'll tell you that, they're a hair piece company!"
Were they wrong though? Their study remains true whether you want to hear it or not and they were pretty smart to conduct it to advertise their rugs.
I already said morally they're equivalent. I don't think there's anything wrong with being loose actually.
My point was generally loose man and monogamous woman couples are healthier and make better adjusted kids than vice versa
And sorry but studies are a lot more reliable than your hearsay. Unlike hearsay, they involve a lot more people, are nowhere near as prone to bias, and are verifiable
The most I can say is possibly bias FOR marriage and traditional gender roles from the organization that carried out the study (the national marriage project). Since its a research organization all about marriage
I don't see any flaws with the studyThis is why I don't accept it in this kind of debate it's flawed and biased
This is only one possible outcome out of many. You always speak in such absolutes.Sleeping around for a girl is all fun and games, but if later, you can never find a guy that's as good as the stud you once fell in love with, you're going to become one miserable b**ch and make life hell for your beta cuck boyfriend, your family, your friends, possibly everyone around you, and it won't be long before you push the self-destruct button and ruin the life of your beta cuck husband and your kids, and go on a 'Eat, Pray, Gag on c*m' road trip.
I don't see any flaws with the study
I was just reaching for any possible flaw
I mean bias is gonna be a lot more apparent in anecdotes
The public verifiable aspect of studies greatly mitigates bias. We can check exactly how it was done