Lol you're confusing two very different thingsA med related to prolactin receptors, but I am not sure what exactly. A group in Discord
Project PDRN
Wonder when they'll test this on the first human male. Imagine being that person, would feel so amazing tbh
It's probably already happened, but no one knows yet.Wonder when they'll test this on the first human male. Imagine being that person, would feel so amazing tbh
The most popular question on this forum... Safety tests have been done already on humans.how do we know this is going to be sides-free for humans?
How likely is that after 3 months of treatment Maybe 1-2years later it will Show cancer or other side effects?3 months is proven safe in humans. It only takes 6 months for it to reverse hair loss to a very significant degree. How likely is it those extra 3 months will turn out to be unsafe? Almost zero when you consider it appears to be safe in non-human primates for 6 months.
Considering the drug is being developed to treat cancer I'd say that's not likely.How likely is that after 3 months of treatment Maybe 1-2years later it will Show cancer or other side effects?
Do you feel smart now?@John Difool thought I'd answer your simple question here:View attachment 172853
View attachment 172869
Yes - a control group of monkeys would have been really helpful. It's not because the goal is to trick some animals
You get some monkeys, randomize them into treatment/no treatment groups, and blind the humans so the results aren't tainted by any bias on the part of the researchers. This is called single blinding
In this case, that would likely (but not necessarily) mean giving placebo injections to the control group monkeys (so the humans don't figure out which of them are on the real treatment). This makes it double blinded
The point of all this is to control for things like food, temperature, lighting, human interactions, prior living conditions, selection bias on the part of humans, etc. - the possible sources of bias here would be a gigantic list
Then at the end the study (which now has high internal validity) you'd be able to show a statistical cause-effect relationship by comparing the untreated monkeys to the treated ones, and also establish effect size. And then finally results can be generalized to humans (this is called external validity)
Thats good.Considering the drug is being developed to treat cancer I'd say that's not likely.
I would pay thousands of dollars to be in the trial.Thats good.
But @pegasus2 wasnt you the guy who Said months ago that For you this 3 months human Test wouldnt be enough? Would you participate in the Phase II trials or would it be to risky For you?
He said it wouldn't be enough to determine efficacy I believe.Thats good.
But @pegasus2 wasnt you the guy who Said months ago that For you this 3 months human Test wouldnt be enough? Would you participate in the Phase II trials or would it be to risky For you?
I told you to stop quoting me. You say the same stuff over and over. I'm tired of this harassment every time I post. Perhaps I need to get the law involvedif the value of proper study controls can be openly mocked, then I view it as an opportunity to go over some of the basics of the scientific method
these exchanges matter more for 3rd parties reading them - I know I probably can't convince you of the importance of tools like peer review
the killer is that I think there's a decent chance HMI-115 works to some degree in humans, and maybe even works really well...
but that it's prudent to see if this works at least once in humans before cancelling my hair transplant procedure
Lmao, send a SWAT team this guy is being quoted on a hairloss forumI told you to stop quoting me. You say the same stuff over and over. I'm tired of this harassment every time I post. Perhaps I need to get the law involved
Good idea. Get on thatLmao, send a SWAT team this guy is being quoted on a hairloss forum
if the value of proper study controls can be openly mocked, then I view it as an opportunity to go over some of the basics of the scientific method
these exchanges matter more for 3rd parties reading them - I know I probably can't convince you of the importance of tools like peer review
the killer is that I think there's a decent chance HMI-115 works to some degree in humans, and maybe even works really well...
but that it's prudent to see if this works at least once in humans before cancelling my hair transplant procedure