G
Guest
Guest
I How can you be in a hair band with no hair?
Good point.......however hair bands belong in the 80`s though and best left there to fade into oblivion. :laugh:
I How can you be in a hair band with no hair?
Come on you Brits had a huge influence on music from the 80's arguably the best period in history for music. All styles, all cultures....never to be repeated ever.
The list of guys that look good without hair starts with Sean connery and ends with Sean Connery get it....
That last one made me laugh Zim. Yeah, some people like Twisted Sister really overdid it, but for every Twisted sister there was a Guns n Roses, Megadeth or Iron Maiden. Duran Duran, Spandau Ballet, Adam Ant - how genuine they were was questionable, but their music was great. What the hell was the 90's about as far as music goes? Nirvana and that's about it. I love 'tallica, but master of puppets wipes the floor with anything they did in the 90's including the black album. And to finish on a hair loss related topic - Kirk was a genius to find minoxidil back in 1990. No internet to help him, no-one to confide in about his problem, must have cost a sh*t load of money (not an issue admittedly) and you want to talk about dedication? 13 years with all that touring night after night in different places! Must have been a nightmare. Kirk I salute you! Thanks for the link 'bone.
zimmy said:Metallica have certainly lost it. I quite liked S&M though. I blame Bob Rock a bit he has faaaar too much infulence on them. I can NOT believe the terrbille production on St. Anger, it sounds terrbille....pingy snare drum...thats not metal!!!!!!!! When will people learn that there is a fine line between experimental and shite.
zimmy said:Come on you Brits had a huge influence on music from the 80's arguably the best period in history for music. All styles, all cultures....never to be repeated ever.
Nooo! Im not a fan of the 80`s all that new romantic crap and glam metal, electronic synthesiser stuff as well. The 80`s was even worse than the 70`s...it really was the era when image was far, far. far more important than the actual music. I mean come on Motley Crue, Poison...men dressing like the ugliest hookers you could ever hope not to want to see, Culture Club....Twisted Sister....Duran Duran....i could go on and on... :laugh:
Huey Lewis and the News rocked though. :rockon:
I would have preferred to be 22 in the 80's as opposed to now. Better music, less violence, better wrestling, cheaper stuff, nice girls (uk girls are horrid beasts these days). If, however, I was there with my unfortunate affliction then I would be screwed! Oh what a cruel world
And who cares that they wore make up, they were all glam rockers it was part of the show. Motley Crue was even more powerful than Metallica back then- just because the bands are sh*t now and strange to younger generes doesn't mean they sucked. I lived it and it was so damn dynamic every few years a different style came out. Today and since the early 90's music has sucked ***.
Nothing good has even come out of the U.K. since the spice girls and Bush.
Who have the kids got today? 98 degrees, Britney Spears, Christina etc....
All the bands from the 80's are doing reuinion tours and making huge cash, Ozzy, Metallica, The Who, Stones, Kiss etc... They wouldnt be able to pull this off if there were good bands today
It's either that or the latest boy band that british b*tch kids still have not got bored with. You guys in the US do not know how lucky you are.
The Spice Girls were a musical abomination! Theres been a few good bands like Oasis, Travis...
How could I have forgotten Travis! But their new album? Oh dear...
I would rather have a lifetime of Britney than another second of Pop bull-fuc*ing -s*it Idol or So Solid bloody Crew, omg how bad are these "artists"!? We need a bloody new norwood scale to measure how far up their own a-holes these people have travelled!