- Reaction score
- 42
armandein said:Its good ask for studies (*)...
I don't think that information about a specific "sebaceous gland defect" in mice has anything to do with what I was talking about. I think it demonstrates a problem in mice with the way that cells in the area of the pilosebaceous unit differentiate into either sebaceous glands or hair follicles. I think that's light-years away from what I was talking about.
armandein said:but I know that you are a formed person that like read the current investigations. There is a lot of them regarding the term “pilosebaceous unit†better than hair follicle in the investigation of hair biology. Do you know a single study or observation where exist hair follicle without sebaceous gland? Surely don’t.
No I don't, but all that proves is that in humans, sebaceous glands are normally associated with the hair follicle. That certainly doesn't prove that sebaceous glands are ESSENTIAL for the growth of hair. Armando, I want you to admit that you don't have any scientific evidence to support what you've been saying.