Craniofacial development - The thing that make us lose hair(A hair loss theory)

[Mitko1]

@Ritchie The last several times I took photos I had some upper eyelid exposure and I think that my upper eyelid exposure is caused by atrophy of the eyelids due to the eye infections I suffered when I was a teen(13-14 year old). I found out actually that I have very good hunter eyes. I still think that I am 8/10 and that my facial structure is very good.

That's the best my poor quality selfie camera can do. If I don't hit the angle my face start to look distorted. With better camera my face will look even better.

 

[Mitko1]

@Ritchie The TMD ocllusion guy is finally back with the craniofacial development topic with a new article. He also puts new evidence that this theory is true. He is showing pictures of hair transplant patients and how poor their craniofacial development is. He claims that he have never seen a hair transplant patient with good craniofacial development. I have never seen one either. He describes craniofacial development the same way as I do. Here are some of the examples he presented and how he describes their craniofacial development. He also claims that lip shape is also affected by the craniofacial development. I think that it's mostly genetic and you can have very good facial structure but thin lips.

Missing support for the eyes, flat cheekbones, deviated septum, recessed maxilla and mandible, high gonial angle, thin lips.

Flat cheekbones, narrow palate (especially visible in the first picture, before veneers).

Missing support for the eyes, flat cheekbones, deviated septum, recessed maxilla and mandible, high gonial angle, small lips.

Missing support for the eyes, extremely flat cheekbones, vertical maxilla, recessed mandible, very high gonial angle, thin lips.

Flat cheekbones and notice the cranial strain (head tilted) in the last picture.

Flat cheekbones, narrow palate (visible in the last picture) and high gonial angle.

Narrow palate (visible in the first and last picture), small lips, relatively flat cheekbones.

Narrow palate with what seems a cranial strain (look at the rotation of the lower teeth compared with the upper ones) and a posterior cross bite. Forward head posture due to a recessed maxilla pushing back the mandible. High gonial angle and flat cheekbones.

Missing support for the eyes, extremely flat cheekbones, vertical maxilla, recessed mandible, high gonial angle, thin lips, narrow palate

Missing support for the eyes, flat cheekbones, vertical maxilla, high gonial angle.

I haven't even seen non balding men with these face shapes aswell. I said not long time ago that whoever thinks that non balding men can have face shapes like these he's in denial.

Link to the full article: https://tmdocclusion.com/2024/11/03/hair-loss-and-craniofacial-development/

 

[Mitko1]

@Ritchie Taylor Hill says about herself: I didn't exist back in high shcool. If she was that attractive she would be one of the most popular girls. According to the black pill theory about the Chad and the Stacy she would be getting hit all the time by guys and would have no problem dating. That's another evidence that she's very overrated.

 

[Mitko1]

@Ritchie Bulgarian girls are much more beautiful and I created a new rating system. I realized that I am not that picky about looks when I look at them. Most of bulgarian girls aren't attractive to me not because of their facial features but because of too muchh facial fat or eyebrows or hair color that doesn't fit them or tattoos. I found an album with a lot of girls and since you can't read bulgarian I gave them numbers.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

Rating them number after number would take a lot of time and I decide to group them in a simple table. Of these girls none look completely undatable. On the full album there was only one. Her facial features to me look weird and uncanny but I can't upload the full album because I can't upload more than 30 images. The rest doesn't have unattractive facial features but at this state I would date only 1, 4, 8, 11, 12, 13, 19, 23, 24. The rest would be attractive to me only If they lose weight, get better eyebrows or another hair color. But they don't exist to be attractive to me. Even If I don't find most girls ugly I can't be attracted to every girl. That's how it is. Nobody is attracted to everyone. What about you Ritchie? Which girls of those you would date and which ones are completely undatable to you?

 

[Ritchie]

@Ritchie Bulgarian girls are much more beautiful and I created a new rating system. I realized that I am not that picky about looks when I look at them. Most of bulgarian girls aren't attractive to me not because of their facial features but because of too muchh facial fat or eyebrows or hair color that doesn't fit them or tattoos. I found an album with a lot of girls and since you can't read bulgarian I gave them numbers.
1
View attachment 189322
2
View attachment 189323
3
View attachment 189324
4
View attachment 189325
5
View attachment 189326
6
View attachment 189327
7
View attachment 189328
8
View attachment 189329
9
View attachment 189330
10
View attachment 189331
11
View attachment 189332
12
View attachment 189333
13
View attachment 189334
14
View attachment 189335
15
View attachment 189336
16
View attachment 189337
17
View attachment 189338
18
View attachment 189339
19
View attachment 189340
20
View attachment 189341
21
View attachment 189342
22
View attachment 189343
23
View attachment 189344
24
View attachment 189345
25
View attachment 189346
26
View attachment 189347
27
View attachment 189348
28
View attachment 189349
29
View attachment 189350
30
View attachment 189351


Rating them number after number would take a lot of time and I decide to group them in a simple table. Of these girls none look completely undatable. On the full album there was only one. Her facial features to me look weird and uncanny but I can't upload the full album because I can't upload more than 30 images. The rest doesn't have unattractive facial features but at this state I would date only 1, 4, 8, 11, 12, 13, 19, 23, 24. The rest would be attractive to me only If they lose weight, get better eyebrows or another hair color. But they don't exist to be attractive to me. Even If I don't find most girls ugly I can't be attracted to every girl. That's how it is. Nobody is attracted to everyone. What about you Ritchie? Which girls of those you would date and which ones are completely undatable to you?

5, 8, 14, 18, 26, 27 are the most attractive.

I would say ones I have zero attraction to are 1, 7, 10, 16, 20, 25, 28

 

[Mitko1]

@Ritchie For me to view a girl as beautiful she doesn't have to be in the 8-9 range. 5.5-6.5 range is enough for me to see a girl as very beautiful.

Like these for examples. Not even close to model tier range but still look very beautiful to me. The ones that are below that range are much less likely to look sympathetic and datable to me(5.0 to 5.5 or below 5)

 

[Ritchie]

@Ritchie For me to view a girl as beautiful she doesn't have to be in the 8-9 range. 5.5-6.5 range is enough for me to see a girl as very beautiful.

View attachment 189394
View attachment 189395
View attachment 189396
View attachment 189397
Like these for examples. Not even close to model tier range but still look very beautiful to me. The ones that are below that range are much less likely to look sympathetic and datable to me(5.0 to 5.5 or below 5)

It's the same for both sexes. Average people are attractive.