do you think his career would have had the same longevity if he was noticeably bald at 25?
Look, I'm not dissing Bowie here...but do you think his career would have had the same longevity if he was noticeably bald at 25?
Damn, beat me to it. I wanted to make a thread going like: "There are people like us..."
"And then people like David Bowie who die a thick NW1 at 69 years old."
What a blissful life he must have lived. Well, he didn't really, but I don't think a NW5 in his youth would have eased his burden.
His hair was like 50% of his career. The other 50% was great and innovative pop music.
His hair was like 50% of his career. The other 50% was great and innovative pop music.
Being semi-good looking is a prerequisite to being a pop star. I can't think of any pop star that is bald and still has a career.
I can, however, think of many bald celebrity actors though, because hollywood NEEDS a bald man to remind us that there is a social divide between the privileged and the balding shitheels.
Yep, the only one I can think of off the top of my head is Pitbull and he is told to make crap music by the Illuminati so that all pop fans are brainwashed into hating bald people.
Pittbull is not bald:
That was well put. I've never quite heard it expressed in this way but I'm sure I've always instinctively known it.I can, however, think of many bald celebrity actors though, because hollywood NEEDS a bald man to remind us that there is a social divide between the privileged and the balding shitheels.
Oh sorry Fred, but close enough, he does his best to be bald and make crap music at the same time, which clearly means he's in the business to cast a bad light on baldies.
And if this guy is a rapper I wouldn't really say he's a pop star.
I do not think of rap as pop.
I was watching Antman on a recent flight, as soon as I saw the bald guy, I knew he would be the villain. Then I watched Mad Max Fury Road... Yeah... Lucky Bowie. Hell, lucky most people. Returning home over Christmas and going out for new years reminded me just how uncommon it is for men under 35 to have any noticable hair loss beyond NW2. I could count on one hand the number of bald men under 60 at the bar
Damn, beat me to it. I wanted to make a thread going like: "There are people like us..."
"And then people like David Bowie who die a thick NW1 at 69 years old."
What a blissful life he must have lived. Well, he didn't really, but I don't think a NW5 in his youth would have eased his burden.
His hair was like 50% of his career. The other 50% was great and innovative pop music.
Moby, Elton John.
Didn't Elton wig up a lot, though??? He was very "flamboyant" so he could get away with it. I don't think we could walk down the street wearing some of the wigs that Elton wore!!I was going to say...being a balding pop star would stuck but Elton John is the largest selling solo act in music history and he burst onto the scene already in the process of losing his hair and still made it
Fook!! Going at 69-70 would be fine in my books!! At least at that age you can STILL wipe your own a-s-s!!Hey may have had a full head of hair, but dying at 69 ain't great..I'd rather be bald and live till I'm a hundred.
It wouldnt of mattered if Bowie lost his hair. He was just an immense talent on so many levels. The 90s pop ruined music for a while also what the acceptable image was for a pop star, but musicians and artists are starting to break the boundaries with talent like Ed Sheeran hes like a 4. But there have been a great amount of balding/bald stars. Phil Collins, Paul Simon, Art Garfunkle, James Taylor, Elton John, Billy Corgan, Common, Ne-yo (hides under a hat though), Billy Joel, Michael Stipe.... John Lennon was also balding before he got gunned down. Apparently had a spot on his crown he would cover. Now if your just a vocalist having people write songs for you than looks are huge, but if your a talented musician you'll be fine.