docj077
Senior Member
- Reaction score
- 1
It's okay, Foote. I understand you're scared of defending your theory.
You still haven't proven anything to me. I undertand, you don't have any scientific studies to back up your claims. Merely a beginning and an end with no middle. Like a sloppy sh*t sandwich minus the sh*t.
As for that website, find a study that proves what it says. My pathology book says differently.
Clinical course:
Varicose dilation of veins renders the valves incompetent and leads to venous stasis, congestion, edema, pain, and thrombosis. The most disabling sequelae include persistant edema in the extremity and trophic changes in the skin that lead to dermatitis, ulcerations, vulnerability to injury, and poorly healing wounds and infections that become chronic varicose ulcers.
Morphology:
Veins with varicosities are dilated, tortuous, elongated, and scarred, with thinning at the ponits of maximal dilation. Intraluminal thrombosis and valvular defomities are frequently discovered when these vessels are opened. Microscopically, the changes consist of variations in the thickness of the wein wall cfaused by dilation in some areas and by compensatory hypertrophy of the smooth muscle and subintimal fibrosis in others. Frequently there is elastic tissue degeneration and spotty calcifications within the meda.
Notice the lack of any mention of an inflammatory response in the vein. There can be associated responses around the vein at the sites of ulceration and inflammation, but the vein is not invovled. No neutrophils, no macrophages, and no lymphocytes.
Robbins and Cotran. Pathologic Basis of Disease. 7th edition. copyright 2005.
Seriously, you still haven't proven anything to me.
It's okay. I understand you don't want to defend yourself or your theory. Both positions mean that your argument and your position can not be proven.
You still haven't proven anything to me. I undertand, you don't have any scientific studies to back up your claims. Merely a beginning and an end with no middle. Like a sloppy sh*t sandwich minus the sh*t.
As for that website, find a study that proves what it says. My pathology book says differently.
Clinical course:
Varicose dilation of veins renders the valves incompetent and leads to venous stasis, congestion, edema, pain, and thrombosis. The most disabling sequelae include persistant edema in the extremity and trophic changes in the skin that lead to dermatitis, ulcerations, vulnerability to injury, and poorly healing wounds and infections that become chronic varicose ulcers.
Morphology:
Veins with varicosities are dilated, tortuous, elongated, and scarred, with thinning at the ponits of maximal dilation. Intraluminal thrombosis and valvular defomities are frequently discovered when these vessels are opened. Microscopically, the changes consist of variations in the thickness of the wein wall cfaused by dilation in some areas and by compensatory hypertrophy of the smooth muscle and subintimal fibrosis in others. Frequently there is elastic tissue degeneration and spotty calcifications within the meda.
Notice the lack of any mention of an inflammatory response in the vein. There can be associated responses around the vein at the sites of ulceration and inflammation, but the vein is not invovled. No neutrophils, no macrophages, and no lymphocytes.
Robbins and Cotran. Pathologic Basis of Disease. 7th edition. copyright 2005.
Seriously, you still haven't proven anything to me.
It's okay. I understand you don't want to defend yourself or your theory. Both positions mean that your argument and your position can not be proven.