- Reaction score
- 310
Yeah but it is mutilation compared to a reduction. I just have qualms about scarring for everyone. That's why I am not high on transplants.
I don't see that at all, just because you're removing something doesn't qualify it as mutilation. If that's the case then by your estimate braces and orthodontic treatments are slow motion mutilation, but what about the inverse?
Why does something just because it happens as a course of biology somehow given a pass? A lot of biological processes can go awry and not serve to the benefit of the person experiencing them, how does that not qualify as mutilation?
I was always very critical of people like that, I always felt like either they had fears they refused to disclose or they were envious of others with the courage to get procedures done.