One would think. Franz's situation puzzles me. A lot of the non-success stories don't make a lot of sense unless we are missing say, some genetic pre-disposition to hair restoration with estrogen which perhaps would have to do with aromatase and T conversion. But it's not just the hair counts as I think most of us thoroughly agree now, that matters. It is rather overall attractiveness and for many us, the ability to grow our hair long.
I feel as though anyone following my protocol or either of the
@bridgeburn protocols would be successful but what we are doing is still rare and we just don't have that much participation still except for MtF's and MtF's often wear wigs and take years for hair improvement and these are years that many/most XY's don't have to wait although as mentioned, we would think hairloss would stop as per eunuchs throughout history upon chemical castration. I am still really interested in these different aspects.
One issue that comes up is whether it is either impossible or extremely difficult to regrow hair in the temples. I think that it is doable but that like with children, this is one of the last areas to respond and fill in at around the ages of say six to eight. It's hard to see why HRT could restore hair everywhere else but not in the temples but it might be that the hair stressors on this area are extra hard to overcome.