- Reaction score
- 460
Stop being delusional.Follica will grow something more than that.
Ten years for 25-50 terminal hairs is pretty damn disappointing.
It's RCH-01 and Tsuji the only hopes for us, and both are big IFs.
Stop being delusional.Follica will grow something more than that.
Both are not a matter of İF more like can I afford it? and how do I manage to fly to Japan.Stop being delusional.
Ten years for 25-50 terminal hairs is pretty damn disappointing.
It's RCH-01 and Tsuji the only hopes for us, and both are big IFs.
Shiseido has a license not only for Japan, but also Korea, China and the countries of ASEA.Both are not a matter of İF more like can I afford it? and how do I manage to fly to Japan.
The question here is why are so many companies outside Japan that are a total failure until now? Why aren't they able to find a cure or at least a better treatment while Japan seems to be somehow better suitable for "creating" a cure/treatment?Shiseido has a license not only for Japan, but also Korea, China and the countries of ASEA.
The price for the treatment itself will be about 1,000$.
Flight tickets and accommodation would cost about 1.000$ each.
So, in total, one would have to pay about 3.000$.
It's not cheap but it ain't unattainable either.
But that is not what's bugging me, personally.
It's the fact that Replicel has failed to find equivalent to Shiseido partners in the U.S and the European markets.
And the question is why.
As for Tsuji, we need to wait at least another year so that we should talk about prices and affordability.
Nah, it's the red tape (FDA, regulations, etc).The question here is why are so many companies outside Japan that are a total failure until now? Why aren't they able to find a cure or at least a better treatment while Japan seems to be somehow better suitable for "creating" a cure/treatment?
I don't know if it's because of higher costs, because of the FDA or other regulatories, but something İS different that makes is quite expensive or meaningless to develop a cheap treatment in a short period of time.
It's RCH-01 and Tsuji the only hopes for us, and both are big IFs.
Someday that's exactly what reality will be like. Youngsters getting immunized at an early age before climbing up the Norwood scale.Yep.
If both of them will go out on market, and RCH-01 will be able to immune hair for DHT, Tsuji will have only temporary business with his technology. Young generation will go for it to make sure hair loss won't happen to them. After few decades Tsuji won't be necessary anymore.
It just hit me, that it sounds to beautiful to be true
Shiseido has a license not only for Japan, but also Korea, China and the countries of ASEA.
The price for the treatment itself will be about 1,000$.
Flight tickets and accommodation would cost about 1,000$ each.
So, in total, one would have to pay about 3,000$.
It's not cheap but it ain't unattainable either.
But that is not what's bugging me, personally.
It's the fact that Replicel has failed to find equivalent to Shiseido partners in the U.S and the European markets.
And the question is why.
As for Tsuji, we need to wait at least another year so that we should talk about prices and affordability.
Yep.
If both of them will go out on market, and RCH-01 will be able to immune hair for DHT, Tsuji will have only temporary business with his technology. Young generation will go for it to make sure hair loss won't happen to them. After few decades Tsuji won't be necessary anymore.
It just hit me, that it sounds to beautiful to be true
I would happily pay $1,000 a month to regain more than a Norwood (which is what 25 terminal follicles is), considering that a good hair transplant costs that or more, but also includes a painful, invasive procedure that doesn't grow hair, can potentially cost hair, and is obvious for many months afterwords.
Exactly , Tsuji will be always necessary .And what about burn victims who have no follicles to immunize? Cancer patients?
Ironic mentioning that it's been researched for 10 years to add the claim of "don't know if it's safe in the long run"Really ? Lets see , :
1) You will have to go to a clinic for the initial treatment, it will take , lets say an hour ? 2 hours ?
2) Then you will have to buy a device and a " drug " from them. Not possibility for a generic verions
3) You will have to go to the clinic for period checkouts
4) How safe is, in long term, periodically damage your scalp ?
How much you will think this will cost for month ? Lest take a bet, no less than 300 usd per month for a treatment that you don't know if is safe in long term and that, in best case scenario, will not give you a full head of hair and will not treat the main problem that it is causing male pattern baldness.
And, of course, in this cost, they have to amortize 10 years of researchs.
If it's the same people being wounded all these ten years, then probably RAIN is safe in the long run.Ironic mentioning that it's been researched for 10 years to add the claim of "don't know if it's safe in the long run"
RCH-01 treatment is for maintenance, but we don't know yet if that's true and for how long hair loss can be halted.Where’d you come up with $1,000? That sounds extremely cheap. How many trips are we looking at here? To go from nw5 to nw1?