http://alpecin.com/en/pdf/alpecin_research_3.pdf
That study, which is going to be published in the International Journal of Dermatology in the coming months according to an email I got from Dr. Wolfe took 600 WHOLE hairs and slathered them with testosterone, testosterone and caffeine, control group. It was conducted at the University of Jena in Germany.
Alpecin may or may not work. Wolfe told me that it kept cAMP from being downregulated in expression. That cAMP is an "energy messenger" within the papilla. Who knows.
BUT>.>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
The effect of testosterone alone slowed hair growth in the 6-10 day culture model vs. what follicles (these are whole follicles) did on their own.
Wookie,
I was alot like you about 2 years ago now when I first started "looking for answers". I was given to look at alternative baldness theories because I felt that if the accepted theory was correct, why in the hell haven't they solved it yet? Stephen's theory was interesting because its the only one that has an explanation for transplanted hair growing (tissue scaffolds allowing for anagen phase enlargement). He also knows a great deal and has read alot and is intelligent. However, Science has shown that androgens DO INDEED have a direct effect on whole hair follicles cultured alone, or hair cells when the dermal papilla cells are present with other kinds of cells. Its not as big of an effect as most of us expected....................hairs didnt just shut down, but they definitely slow growth. Maybe thats all it takes for the immune cells circulating in the body to become interested in them, slower growth and the presence of the growth inhibitors that the papilla is releasing to the rest of the follicle. The chronic inflammation, immune response, growth inhibitors, oxides, etc. seem to do the big damage later, but maybe this is what gets it started. WE DO know that if a man gets castrated, it pretty much halts further balding according to Duke University researchers, and he'll even grow a little (not that much) back.
In short, all these very bright scientists, many of whom have lost some hair or are bald and would LOVE to stop it just like the two of us, arent wrong, and damn sure arent being paid off by hair transplant docs. A "cure" would put hair transplant docs out of business when the last cycle of men whove lost hair got their plugs as the newbies behind them would ARREST their baldness.
But take heart man, Intercytex is entering phase 2 HM trials in June or July. Most indications that pass phase 2 go on to market enentually. Soon we may be just multiplying our hippocratic wreath's hair cells 10-fold and nobody (unless they have alopecia totallis or universiallis) will have to be bald. Ive posted about some of Gho's latest work elsewhere on this forum, and he really does have a pic of impressive donor generation also, and a pic of a very bald danish guy who has much more hair than a transplant alone could give him (proving that he's had is donor area multiplied to an extent, although Gho can only move 600 hairs a day with his very labor intensive technique). There are reasons to be optomistic